World League 2011 Final
Introduction.
Russia is World League champion 2011 by a 3-2 victory over Brazil in the final. Poland supported by its home public took third place by 3-0 win over Argentine.
The attack has been decisive in the final matches Average attack data are presented next
Attack.
Team data for attack are summarized in following table. The teams are ranked according the to zero error corrected attack result csuc %. Russia and Brazil score highest success. Argentine did surprise on the championship by very good play , but failed completely in the match for the third place where their attack reached only 39 % against 49 % for Poland which made a remarkable score as compared to its much average lower value over the tournament.
Teams / suc / err / cont / tot / %suc / %err / csuc / vr*RUS / 192 / 39 / 140 / 371 / 51.75 / 10.51 / 46.08 / 48.19
BRA / 207 / 58 / 133 / 398 / 52.01 / 14.57 / 43.82 / 36.52
ARG / 219 / 57 / 153 / 429 / 51.05 / 13.29 / 43.55 / 37.04
CUB / 157 / 56 / 110 / 323 / 48.61 / 17.34 / 37.83 / 44.05
USA / 163 / 60 / 113 / 336 / 48.51 / 17.86 / 37.32 / 32.67
ITA / 122 / 49 / 89 / 260 / 46.92 / 18.85 / 34.60 / 40.69
BUL / 119 / 36 / 123 / 278 / 42.81 / 12.95 / 34.30 / 33.61
POL / 188 / 70 / 170 / 428 / 43.93 / 16.36 / 32.96 / 31.83
TOT / 1367 / 425 / 1031 / 2823 / 48.42 / 15.05 / 39.28 / 35.18
*csuc continental round
Brasiliaand Argentine made much better results in the final round as the USA also i but both Cuba and Italia scored much lower.
Blocking.
Block data are summarized in next table. The teams are ranked to the numberof success blocks per set. Bulgaria and Russia show best results with around 3 successes per set.
Allteams made lower scores in the final . The average dropped from 2.6 to 2.3 suc/set. Remarkable poor result for Italia with only 1.6 suc/set
Blocking for Argentine is not very performing with 2.6 in the preliminary round and 2.0 in the final
Teams / suc / err / cont / tot / suc/s / %suc / vr*BUL / 34 / 98 / 58 / 190 / 3.07 / 17.89 / 3.18
RUS / 40 / 115 / 92 / 247 / 2.86 / 16.19 / 3.31
POL / 41 / 159 / 126 / 326 / 2.43 / 12.58 / 3.24
USA / 31 / 139 / 56 / 226 / 2.39 / 13.72 / 3.19
CUB / 29 / 132 / 71 / 232 / 2.22 / 12.50 / 2.67
BRA / 31 / 138 / 102 / 271 / 2.06 / 11.44 / 2.61
ARG / 30 / 142 / 80 / 252 / 2.00 / 11.90 / 2.64
ITA / 16 / 83 / 66 / 165 / 1.60 / 9.70 / 3.04
TOT / 252 / 1006 / 651 / 1909 / 2.33 / 13.20 / 2.57
Vr* continental round
Service
Results for the service are summarized in the following table .The teams are ranked according the ace ratio which takes into account both aces and errors. ranking for. Russia,Italy and the USA make best score with around 0.27 ace ratio which is not a particular high value. The ratio is certainly lower than the average point scoring probability for the teamshaving the service which will be around 0.38.
Teams / ace / err / cont / tot / ace/s / %ace / %err / rat / ratio / ratio*RUS / 26 / 61 / 258 / 345 / 1.84 / 7.54 / 17.68 / 3.37 / 0.30 / 0.28
ITA / 16 / 43 / 170 / 229 / 1.60 / 6.99 / 18.78 / 3.30 / 0.27 / 0.31
USA / 15 / 41 / 228 / 284 / 1.15 / 5.28 / 14.44 / 3.34 / 0.27 / 0.27
POL / 18 / 61 / 273 / 352 / 1.07 / 5.11 / 17.33 / 3.23 / 0.23 / 0.21
ARG / 19 / 69 / 272 / 360 / 1.28 / 5.28 / 19.17 / 3.17 / 0.22 / 0.23
BUL / 10 / 37 / 195 / 242 / 0.90 / 4.13 / 15.29 / 3.23 / 0.21 / 0.25
CUB / 10 / 40 / 221 / 271 / 0.77 / 3.69 / 14.76 / 3.22 / 0.20 / 0.19
BRA / 9 / 63 / 276 / 348 / 0.61 / 2.59 / 18.10 / 3.03 / 0.13 / 0.20
TOT / 123 / 415 / 1893 / 2431 / 1.14 / 5.06 / 17.07 / 3.23 / 0.18 / 0.23
Ratio* results from continental round
Russia scores most aces 7.5 %and Argentine most errors with .19.17%The rating scale based on 10 points for an ace and 3.5 points for a neutral result show comparable ranking.with Russia the USA and Italy on top.
Digs.
Defense data are presented in next table. The teams are ranked to the number of success digs per set. Argentine Russia and Brazil make best score with about 17 successes per set. Cuba and Italy who are last in rank score around 14 successes per set.
Incomprehensible difference with the results from the continental round, indicating problem of consistency.
Teams / suc / err / cont / tot / suc/s / %suc / suc/s*ARG / 266 / 60 / 31 / 357 / 17.72 / 74.51 / 5.72
RUS / 240 / 53 / 31 / 324 / 17.13 / 74.07 / 5.91
BRA / 256 / 61 / 22 / 339 / 17.06 / 75.52 / 12.50
POL / 276 / 60 / 33 / 369 / 16.25 / 74.80 / 13.19
BUL / 177 / 53 / 21 / 251 / 16.09 / 70.52 / 6.36
USA / 208 / 33 / 26 / 267 / 16.01 / 77.90 / 10.30
ITA / 144 / 36 / 19 / 199 / 14.40 / 72.36 / 8.91
CUB / 183 / 51 / 13 / 247 / 14.07 / 74.09 / 7.03
TOT / 1750 / 407 / 196 / 2353 / 16.20 / 74.37 / 7.63
Suc/s* results from continental round
Receiving.
Data for service receiving are summarized in the following table. The teams are ranked according to the amount of errors. TheUSA makes least errors with 4.78 %
It can be remarked here that not all teams have the same amount of matches and the tournament is not full round robin USA , Cuba Italy and Bulgaria have therefore less receiving data.. This may cause some bias in results and comparing should be done with care.Poor result in receiving for Russia with 8.7 % and Brazil with 8.22% error. Near all teams except the USA made significant less errors in the continental round the average error rose from 5.75 to 7.10 %.
Teams / exc / fout / cont / tot / %err / %exc / %err**USA / 167 / 12 / 72 / 251 / 4.78 / 66.53 / 5.70
CUB / 156 / 13 / 75 / 244 / 5.33 / 63.93 / 4.92
ARG / 200 / 18 / 70 / 288 / 6.25 / 69.44 / 5.80
ITA / 118 / 12 / 50 / 180 / 6.67 / 65.56 / 5.99
POL / 200 / 25 / 84 / 309 / 8.09 / 64.72 / 5.74
BRA / 180 / 24 / 88 / 292 / 8.22 / 61.64 / 2.99
BUL / 124 / 17 / 57 / 198 / 8.59 / 62.63 / 5.26
RUS / 141 / 22 / 90 / 253 / 8.70 / 55.73 / 4.59
TOT / 1286 / 143 / 586 / 2015 / 7.10 / 63.82 / 5.75
%err** results from continental round
PLAYER RESULTS
ATTACK
Attack data are presented in following tables. The data are separated in two categories, one for players with more than 80 attacks and the second one for players with more than 25 but less than 80 attacks .The limit is arbitrary and attempts to distinguish the outside hitters from the middle hitters. The players are ranked according the to zero error corrected success data csuc%.Lopes Theo for Brazil is the best hitter with 60.9 % success.
Rank / Name / Team / suc / error / cont / tot / %suc / %error / Csuc%1 / Lopes Theo / BRA / 39 / 8 / 17 / 64 / 60.94 / 12.50 / 55.36
4 / Khtei Taras / RUS / 49 / 6 / 36 / 91 / 53.85 / 6.59 / 50.59
2 / Conte F / ARG / 70 / 17 / 38 / 125 / 56.00 / 13.60 / 49.07
3 / Mikhaylov M / RUS / 58 / 13 / 36 / 107 / 54.21 / 12.15 / 47.87
6 / Anderson M / USA / 49 / 15 / 31 / 95 / 51.58 / 15.79 / 42.50
5 / Savani C / ITA / 37 / 12 / 22 / 71 / 52.11 / 16.90 / 42.37
8 / Sokolov T / BUL / 34 / 10 / 26 / 70 / 48.57 / 14.29 / 40.00
N/A / Quiroga R / ARG / 24 / 6 / 22 / 52 / 46.15 / 11.54 / 39.13
7 / Leon Venero / CUB / 43 / 16 / 26 / 85 / 50.59 / 18.82 / 39.13
11 / Kurek B / POL / 70 / 20 / 58 / 148 / 47.30 / 13.51 / 39.06
10 / Godoy Filho / BRA / 40 / 12 / 32 / 84 / 47.62 / 14.29 / 38.89
12 / Bell Cisnero / CUB / 39 / 11 / 34 / 84 / 46.43 / 13.10 / 38.36
9 / Endres M / BRA / 33 / 11 / 25 / 69 / 47.83 / 15.94 / 37.93
13 / Pereyra F / ARG / 39 / 15 / 31 / 85 / 45.88 / 17.65 / 34.29
16 / Kaziyski M / BUL / 34 / 12 / 41 / 87 / 39.08 / 13.79 / 29.33
15 / Biriukov D / RUS / 27 / 10 / 32 / 69 / 39.13 / 14.49 / 28.81
14 / Stanley C / USA / 36 / 19 / 30 / 85 / 42.35 / 22.35 / 25.76
17 / Zaytsev Ivan / ITA / 25 / 12 / 29 / 66 / 37.88 / 18.18 / 24.07
20 / Jarosz Jakub / POL / 24 / 13 / 29 / 66 / 36.36 / 19.70 / 20.75
18 / Lasko Michal / ITA / 28 / 20 / 26 / 74 / 37.84 / 27.03 / 14.81
19 / Hernandez / CUB / 30 / 25 / 25 / 80 / 37.50 / 31.25 / 9.09
FIVB rank is based on % suc only.
Players with more than 20 but less than 80 attacks.
Good results for the five best ranked
Saatkamp Lucas / BRA / 35 / 4 / 7 / 46 / 76.09 / 8.70 / 73.81Camejo Durruty Osmany / CUB / 17 / 3 / 4 / 24 / 70.83 / 12.50 / 66.67
Volkov Alexander / RUS / 19 / 1 / 9 / 29 / 65.52 / 3.45 / 64.29
Sole Sebastian / ARG / 18 / 1 / 9 / 28 / 64.29 / 3.57 / 62.96
Mesa Sandobal Isbel / CUB / 15 / 0 / 10 / 25 / 60.00 / 0.00 / 60.00
dos Santos Jr. Sidnei / BRA / 22 / 3 / 11 / 36 / 61.11 / 8.33 / 57.58
Lee David / USA / 23 / 6 / 7 / 36 / 63.89 / 16.67 / 56.67
Birarelli Emanuele / ITA / 14 / 4 / 5 / 23 / 60.87 / 17.39 / 52.63
Lotman Paul / USA / 15 / 2 / 10 / 27 / 55.56 / 7.41 / 52.00
Kosok Grzegorz / POL / 13 / 3 / 7 / 23 / 56.52 / 13.04 / 50.00
Nikolov Vladimir / BUL / 15 / 2 / 11 / 28 / 53.57 / 7.14 / 50.00
Ocampo Lucas / ARG / 16 / 4 / 10 / 30 / 53.33 / 13.33 / 46.15
Nowakowski Piotr / POL / 25 / 6 / 17 / 48 / 52.08 / 12.50 / 45.24
Crer Pablo / ARG / 19 / 6 / 10 / 35 / 54.29 / 17.14 / 44.83
Muserskiy Dmitriy / RUS / 17 / 6 / 12 / 35 / 48.57 / 17.14 / 37.93
Bartman Zbigniew / POL / 16 / 8 / 10 / 34 / 47.06 / 23.53 / 30.77
Gruszka Piotr / POL / 13 / 6 / 12 / 31 / 41.94 / 19.35 / 28.00
Vissotto Neves Leandro / BRA / 17 / 10 / 12 / 39 / 43.59 / 25.64 / 24.14
Amaral Dante G / BRA / 12 / 5 / 19 / 36 / 33.33 / 13.89 / 22.58
Priddy William / USA / 17 / 10 / 20 / 47 / 36.17 / 21.28 / 18.92
21 / Aleksiev Todor / BUL / 13 / 7 / 22 / 42 / 30.95 / 16.67 / 17.14
Scholtis Gustavo / ARG / 11 / 6 / 19 / 36 / 30.56 / 16.67 / 16.67
Ruciak Michal / POL / 14 / 9 / 26 / 49 / 28.57 / 18.37 / 12.50
Attack distribution for teams in final four
Rank / Name / Team / suc / error / cont / tot / %suc / %err / csuc%3 / Mikhaylov Maxim / RUS / 58 / 13 / 36 / 107 / 54.21 / 12.15 / 47.87
4 / Khtei Taras / RUS / 49 / 6 / 36 / 91 / 53.85 / 6.59 / 50.59
15 / Biriukov Denis / RUS / 27 / 10 / 32 / 69 / 39.13 / 14.49 / 28.81
Muserskiy Dmitriy / RUS / 17 / 6 / 12 / 35 / 48.57 / 17.14 / 37.93
Volkov Alexander / RUS / 19 / 1 / 9 / 29 / 65.52 / 3.45 / 64.29
Spiridonov Alexey / RUS / 9 / 1 / 5 / 15 / 60.00 / 6.67 / 57.14
Grankin Sergey / RUS / 6 / 1 / 3 / 10 / 60.00 / 10.00 / 55.56
Ilinykh Dmitriy / RUS / 4 / 1 / 4 / 9 / 44.44 / 11.11 / 37.50
Apalikov Nikolay / RUS / 3 / 2 / 5 / 60.00 / 0.00 / 60.00
11 / Kurek Bartosz / POL / 70 / 20 / 58 / 148 / 47.30 / 13.51 / 39.06
20 / Jarosz Jakub / POL / 24 / 13 / 29 / 66 / 36.36 / 19.70 / 20.75
Ruciak Michal / POL / 14 / 9 / 26 / 49 / 28.57 / 18.37 / 12.50
Nowakowski Piotr / POL / 25 / 6 / 17 / 48 / 52.08 / 12.50 / 45.24
Bartman Zbigniew / POL / 16 / 8 / 10 / 34 / 47.06 / 23.53 / 30.77
Gruszka Piotr / POL / 13 / 6 / 12 / 31 / 41.94 / 19.35 / 28.00
Kosok Grzegorz / POL / 13 / 3 / 7 / 23 / 56.52 / 13.04 / 50.00
Mozdzonek / POL / 5 / 1 / 6 / 12 / 41.67 / 8.33 / 36.36
Kubiak Michal / POL / 6 / 3 / 2 / 11 / 54.55 / 27.27 / 37.50
Zygadlo Lukasz / POL / 2 / 1 / 3 / 6 / 33.33 / 16.67 / 20.00
10 / Godoy Filho / BRA / 40 / 12 / 32 / 84 / 47.62 / 14.29 / 38.89
9 / Endres Murilo / BRA / 33 / 11 / 25 / 69 / 47.83 / 15.94 / 37.93
1 / Lopes Theo / BRA / 39 / 8 / 17 / 64 / 60.94 / 12.50 / 55.36
Saatkamp Lucas / BRA / 35 / 4 / 7 / 46 / 76.09 / 8.70 / 73.81
Vissotto Neves / BRA / 17 / 10 / 12 / 39 / 43.59 / 25.64 / 24.14
Amaral Dante G / BRA / 12 / 5 / 19 / 36 / 33.33 / 13.89 / 22.58
dos Santos Jr. S / BRA / 22 / 3 / 11 / 36 / 61.11 / 8.33 / 57.58
Santana Rodrigo / BRA / 6 / 1 / 3 / 10 / 60.00 / 10.00 / 55.56
Bravo Pereira / BRA / 2 / 3 / 3 / 8 / 25.00 / 37.50 / -20.00
Rezende Bruno / BRA / 1 / 3 / 4 / 25.00 / 0.00 / 25.00
Muraguti Yared / BRA / 1 / 1 / 2 / 0.00 / 50.00 / -100.00
2 / Conte Facundo / ARG / 70 / 17 / 38 / 125 / 56.00 / 13.60 / 49.07
13 / Pereyra Federico / ARG / 39 / 15 / 31 / 85 / 45.88 / 17.65 / 34.29
N/A / Quiroga Rodrigo / ARG / 24 / 6 / 22 / 52 / 46.15 / 11.54 / 39.13
Scholtis Gustavo / ARG / 11 / 6 / 19 / 36 / 30.56 / 16.67 / 16.67
Crer Pablo / ARG / 19 / 6 / 10 / 35 / 54.29 / 17.14 / 44.83
Ocampo Lucas / ARG / 16 / 4 / 10 / 30 / 53.33 / 13.33 / 46.15
Sole Sebastian / ARG / 18 / 1 / 9 / 28 / 64.29 / 3.57 / 62.96
Arroyo Gabriel / ARG / 10 / 1 / 4 / 15 / 66.67 / 6.67 / 64.29
Giustiniano / ARG / 7 / 1 / 5 / 13 / 53.85 / 7.69 / 50.00
Block data.
Results .
Block data are summarized in next table. The players are ranked according to the number of success blocks per set. The % success is also indicated ,as the fivb data do take into account the number of sets for the team and not necessarily the player.
List of players with at least one block.
Rank / Name / Team / suc / error / cont / tot / suc/s / %suc1 / Mikhaylov Maxim / RUS / 14 / 12 / 14 / 40 / 1.00 / 35.00
2 / Sole Sebastian / ARG / 14 / 41 / 28 / 83 / 0.93 / 16.87
3 / Muserskiy Dmitriy / RUS / 11 / 29 / 29 / 69 / 0.79 / 15.94
4 / Yosifov Viktor / BUL / 8 / 22 / 17 / 47 / 0.73 / 17.02
5 / Lee David / USA / 9 / 44 / 18 / 71 / 0.69 / 12.68
6 / Nowakowski Piotr / POL / 11 / 43 / 30 / 84 / 0.65 / 13.10
7 / Kurek Bartosz / POL / 10 / 14 / 15 / 39 / 0.59 / 25.64
8 / Anderson Matthew / USA / 7 / 15 / 5 / 27 / 0.54 / 25.93
9 / Mesa Sandobal I / CUB / 7 / 39 / 14 / 60 / 0.54 / 11.67
10 / Travica Dragan / ITA / 5 / 10 / 8 / 23 / 0.50 / 21.74
11 / Lopes Theo / BRA / 7 / 18 / 9 / 34 / 0.47 / 20.59
12 / Leon Venero W / CUB / 6 / 10 / 8 / 24 / 0.46 / 25.00
13 / Volkov Alexander / RUS / 6 / 27 / 14 / 47 / 0.43 / 12.77
14 / Kosok Grzegorz / POL / 7 / 35 / 22 / 64 / 0.41 / 10.94
15 / Saatkamp Lucas / BRA / 6 / 25 / 29 / 60 / 0.40 / 10.00
16 / Buti Simone / ITA / 4 / 18 / 13 / 35 / 0.40 / 11.43
17 / Bell Cisnero Henry / CUB / 5 / 15 / 12 / 32 / 0.38 / 15.63
18 / Camejo Durruty / CUB / 5 / 29 / 11 / 45 / 0.38 / 11.11
19 / Nikolov Vladimir / BUL / 4 / 5 / 4 / 13 / 0.36 / 30.77
20 / Sokolov Tsvetan / BUL / 4 / 6 / 4 / 14 / 0.36 / 28.57
21 / Tsvetanov Hristo / BUL / 4 / 10 / 6 / 20 / 0.36 / 20.00
Aleksiev Todor / BUL / 4 / 8 / 4 / 16 / 0.36 / 25.00
23 / Khtei Taras / RUS / 5 / 16 / 9 / 30 / 0.36 / 16.67
24 / Endres Murilo / BRA / 5 / 15 / 7 / 27 / 0.33 / 18.52
25 / Holmes Russell / USA / 4 / 19 / 1 / 24 / 0.31 / 16.67
26 / Zaytsev Ivan / ITA / 3 / 9 / 8 / 20 / 0.30 / 15.00
27 / Ocampo Lucas / ARG / 4 / 5 / 4 / 13 / 0.27 / 30.77
28 / Conte Facundo / ARG / 4 / 9 / 6 / 19 / 0.27 / 21.05
29 / Kaziyski Matey / BUL / 3 / 10 / 6 / 19 / 0.27 / 15.79
30 / Todorov Teodor / BUL / 3 / 13 / 5 / 21 / 0.27 / 14.29
31 / Zygadlo Lukasz / POL / 4 / 12 / 26 / 42 / 0.24 / 9.52
32 / Mozdzonek Marcin / POL / 4 / 14 / 12 / 30 / 0.24 / 13.33
33 / Hernandez Ramos / CUB / 3 / 12 / 7 / 22 / 0.23 / 13.64
34 / Stanley Clayton / USA / 3 / 15 / 9 / 27 / 0.23 / 11.11
35 / Millar Ryan / USA / 3 / 23 / 8 / 34 / 0.23 / 8.82
36 / Biriukov Denis / RUS / 3 / 13 / 12 / 28 / 0.21 / 10.71
37 / Godoy Filho G / BRA / 3 / 14 / 9 / 26 / 0.20 / 11.54
38 / Savani Cristian / ITA / 2 / 11 / 7 / 20 / 0.20 / 10.00
39 / dos Santos Jr. S / BRA / 3 / 29 / 19 / 51 / 0.20 / 5.88
40 / Crer Pablo / ARG / 3 / 27 / 11 / 41 / 0.20 / 7.32
41 / Penchev Nikolay / BUL / 2 / 2 / 1 / 5 / 0.18 / 40.00
42 / Zhekov Andrey / BUL / 2 / 21 / 11 / 34 / 0.18 / 5.88
43 / Diaz Carmenate Y / CUB / 2 / 15 / 17 / 34 / 0.15 / 5.88
44 / Lotman Paul / USA / 2 / 4 / 2 / 8 / 0.15 / 25.00
45 / Amaral Dante G / BRA / 2 / 5 / 7 / 14 / 0.13 / 14.29
46 / Vissotto Neves L / BRA / 2 / 6 / 3 / 11 / 0.13 / 18.18
47 / Santana Rodrigo / BRA / 2 / 11 / 7 / 20 / 0.13 / 10.00
48 / Arroyo Gabriel / ARG / 2 / 10 / 4 / 16 / 0.13 / 12.50
49 / Quiroga Rodrigo / ARG / 2 / 12 / 2 / 16 / 0.13 / 12.50
50 / Bartman Zbigniew / POL / 2 / 3 / 3 / 8 / 0.12 / 25.00
51 / Ruciak Michal / POL / 2 / 16 / 7 / 25 / 0.12 / 8.00
52 / Birarelli Emanuele / ITA / 1 / 19 / 23 / 43 / 0.10 / 2.33
53 / Lasko Michal / ITA / 1 / 15 / 7 / 23 / 0.10 / 4.35
54 / Priddy William / USA / 1 / 5 / 5 / 11 / 0.08 / 9.09
55 / Hansen Kevin / USA / 1 / 1 / 2 / 0.08 / 50.00
56 / Thornton Brian / USA / 1 / 10 / 7 / 18 / 0.08 / 5.56
57 / Perdomo Naranjo Y / CUB / 1 / 5 / 1 / 7 / 0.08 / 14.29
58 / Rezende Bruno M / BRA / 1 / 7 / 6 / 14 / 0.07 / 7.14
59 / Apalikov Nikolay / RUS / 1 / 5 / 3 / 9 / 0.07 / 11.11
60 / De Cecco Luciano / ARG / 1 / 9 / 6 / 16 / 0.07 / 6.25
61 / Gruszka Piotr / POL / 1 / 5 / 3 / 9 / 0.06 / 11.11
Service data.
A survey of service data is presented in next table. The players are ranked with a rating scale with 10 points per ace and 3.5 points for a neutral service The data are for players with more than 25 attempts and two aces.. The fivb ranks only on aces per set where hence no account is taken of the errors. Best result is for Travica Dragan from Italy with 6 aces and a rating of 3.72 The fivb elected Musersky from Russia as best server with 10 aces and a good ratio of 0.50.
Rank / Name / Team / aces / err / cont / tot / ace/s / %ace / %err / rating / ratio2 / Travica Dragan / ITA / 6 / 8 / 35 / 49 / 0.60 / 12.24 / 16.33 / 3.72 / 0.43
1 / Muserskiy Dmitriy / RUS / 10 / 15 / 42 / 67 / 0.71 / 14.93 / 22.39 / 3.69 / 0.40
3 / Zaytsev Ivan / ITA / 5 / 8 / 30 / 43 / 0.50 / 11.63 / 18.60 / 3.60 / 0.38
5 / Anderson Matthew / USA / 6 / 10 / 39 / 55 / 0.46 / 10.91 / 18.18 / 3.57 / 0.38
8 / Mikhaylov Maxim / RUS / 4 / 9 / 41 / 54 / 0.29 / 7.41 / 16.67 / 3.40 / 0.31
6 / Hernandez Ramos Fernando / CUB / 6 / 14 / 29 / 49 / 0.46 / 12.24 / 28.57 / 3.30 / 0.30
12 / Ruciak Michal / POL / 4 / 11 / 43 / 58 / 0.24 / 6.90 / 18.97 / 3.28 / 0.27
13 / Leon Venero Wilfredo / CUB / 3 / 9 / 42 / 54 / 0.23 / 5.56 / 16.67 / 3.28 / 0.25
14 / Biriukov Denis / RUS / 3 / 8 / 24 / 35 / 0.21 / 8.57 / 22.86 / 3.26 / 0.27
10 / Kaziyski Matey / BUL / 3 / 9 / 30 / 42 / 0.27 / 7.14 / 21.43 / 3.21 / 0.25
21 / Stanley Clayton / USA / 2 / 8 / 37 / 47 / 0.15 / 4.26 / 17.02 / 3.18 / 0.20
18 / Saatkamp Lucas / BRA / 3 / 9 / 23 / 35 / 0.20 / 8.57 / 25.71 / 3.16 / 0.25
17 / De Cecco Luciano / ARG / 3 / 12 / 40 / 55 / 0.20 / 5.45 / 21.82 / 3.09 / 0.20
7 / Conte Facundo / ARG / 5 / 17 / 41 / 63 / 0.33 / 7.94 / 26.98 / 3.07 / 0.23
4 / Kurek Bartosz / POL / 8 / 23 / 30 / 61 / 0.47 / 13.11 / 37.70 / 3.03 / 0.26
11 / Pereyra Federico / ARG / 4 / 14 / 20 / 38 / 0.27 / 10.53 / 36.84 / 2.89 / 0.22
Digs
A summary of digs is given in next table. The data are ranked for the number of success digs per set. Data are given for players with more than 20 success digs. Best digger is the Russian libero Sokolov with 4.71 succes per set. The liberos take active part in defense and aremarked in yellow.Digging in the final was better than in continental round where Ignaczak made a score of 3.93 as best digger.
Rank / Name / Team / digs / error / cont / tot / suc/s / %suc1 / Sokolov Alexander / RUS / 66 / 17 / 6 / 89 / 4.71 / 74.16
2 / Gutierrez Torres K / CUB / 58 / 12 / 3 / 73 / 4.46 / 79.45
3 / Ivanov Vladislav / BUL / 49 / 15 / 2 / 66 / 4.45 / 74.24
4 / González Alexis / ARG / 66 / 13 / 5 / 84 / 4.40 / 78.57
5 / Santos Sérgio Dutra / BRA / 63 / 19 / 5 / 87 / 4.20 / 72.41
6 / Ignaczak Krzysztof / POL / 67 / 21 / 2 / 90 / 3.94 / 74.44
7 / Lambourne Richard / USA / 45 / 8 / 3 / 56 / 3.46 / 80.36
8 / Bari Andrea / ITA / 33 / 10 / 1 / 44 / 3.30 / 75.00
9 / Endres Murilo / BRA / 46 / 12 / 4 / 62 / 3.07 / 74.19
10 / Mikhaylov Maxim / RUS / 42 / 7 / 3 / 52 / 3.00 / 80.77
11 / De Cecco Luciano / ARG / 42 / 7 / 6 / 55 / 2.80 / 76.36
12 / Kurek Bartosz / POL / 45 / 8 / 5 / 58 / 2.65 / 77.59
13 / Zhekov Andrey / BUL / 29 / 5 / 4 / 38 / 2.64 / 76.32
14 / Priddy William / USA / 33 / 2 / 1 / 36 / 2.54 / 91.67
15 / Anderson Matthew / USA / 33 / 3 / 3 / 39 / 2.54 / 84.62
16 / Stanley Clayton / USA / 33 / 6 / 6 / 45 / 2.54 / 73.33
17 / Travica Dragan / ITA / 25 / 8 / 4 / 37 / 2.50 / 67.57
18 / Khtei Taras / RUS / 34 / 5 / 6 / 45 / 2.43 / 75.56
19 / Leon Venero Wilfredo / CUB / 31 / 7 / 38 / 2.38 / 81.58
20 / Diaz Carmenate / CUB / 31 / 8 / 2 / 41 / 2.38 / 75.61
21 / Kaziyski Matey / BUL / 26 / 4 / 1 / 31 / 2.36 / 83.87
22 / Zygadlo Lukasz / POL / 39 / 6 / 9 / 54 / 2.29 / 72.22
23 / Biriukov Denis / RUS / 32 / 6 / 5 / 43 / 2.29 / 74.42
24 / Quiroga Rodrigo / ARG / 33 / 4 / 1 / 38 / 2.20 / 86.84
25 / Lopes Theo / BRA / 32 / 7 / 2 / 41 / 2.13 / 78.05
26 / Savani Cristian / ITA / 21 / 5 / 5 / 31 / 2.10 / 67.74
27 / Thornton Brian / USA / 26 / 4 / 2 / 32 / 2.00 / 81.25
28 / Grankin Sergey / RUS / 28 / 9 / 5 / 42 / 2.00 / 66.67
29 / Godoy Filho Gilberto / BRA / 29 / 6 / 3 / 38 / 1.93 / 76.32
30 / Conte Facundo / ARG / 29 / 11 / 3 / 43 / 1.93 / 67.44
31 / Birarelli Emanuele / ITA / 19 / 4 / 23 / 1.90 / 82.61
32 / Rezende Bruno / BRA / 27 / 2 / 3 / 32 / 1.80 / 84.38
33 / Lasko Michal / ITA / 18 / 3 / 5 / 26 / 1.80 / 69.23
34 / Ruciak Michal / POL / 28 / 8 / 6 / 42 / 1.65 / 66.67
35 / Sokolov Tsvetan / BUL / 18 / 4 / 3 / 25 / 1.64 / 72.00
36 / Zaytsev Ivan / ITA / 16 / 2 / 3 / 21 / 1.60 / 76.19
37 / Ocampo Lucas / ARG / 20 / 6 / 2 / 28 / 1.33 / 71.43
Receiving
Service reception data are given next. Data are ranked for increasing percentage error The fivb data are ranked on an efficacy bases which is defined as % excellent minus the error percentage. This definition under estimates the error influence where more over the judgment of excellent appears to be rather subjective with often no consistency in the data. Correlation with end results score usually also higher with errors than with excellent.Data are for players with more than 30 attempts.Endres Murillo from Brazil makes best score with only 1.57% error on 127 attemptsas compared to 1.18 % error in the preliminary round on 254 attempts..
Rank / Name / Team / exc / err / cont / tot / %exc / %err2 / Endres Murilo / BRA / 91 / 2 / 34 / 127 / 71.65 / 1.57
3 / Leon Venero Wilfredo / CUB / 80 / 2 / 32 / 114 / 70.18 / 1.75
1 / Anderson Matthew / USA / 67 / 2 / 17 / 86 / 77.91 / 2.33
4 / Quiroga Rodrigo / ARG / 71 / 3 / 28 / 102 / 69.61 / 2.94
8 / Gutierrez Torres Keibir / CUB / 51 / 4 / 23 / 78 / 65.38 / 5.13
6 / Zaytsev Ivan / ITA / 49 / 4 / 19 / 72 / 68.06 / 5.56
Penchev Nikolay / BUL / 23 / 2 / 9 / 34 / 67.65 / 5.88
11 / Lambourne Richard / USA / 42 / 4 / 22 / 68 / 61.76 / 5.88
12 / Bari Andrea / ITA / 43 / 5 / 23 / 71 / 60.56 / 7.04
9 / Ignaczak Krzysztof / POL / 85 / 9 / 33 / 127 / 66.93 / 7.09
16 / Khtei Taras / RUS / 37 / 5 / 26 / 68 / 54.41 / 7.35
10 / Santos Sérgio Dutra / BRA / 53 / 6 / 22 / 81 / 65.43 / 7.41
14 / Priddy William / USA / 37 / 5 / 24 / 66 / 56.06 / 7.58
7 / Kaziyski Matey / BUL / 45 / 5 / 15 / 65 / 69.23 / 7.69
N/A / Ruciak Michal / POL / 47 / 6 / 17 / 70 / 67.14 / 8.57
17 / Ivanov Vladislav / BUL / 31 / 5 / 20 / 56 / 55.36 / 8.93
13 / Sokolov Alexander / RUS / 61 / 9 / 30 / 100 / 61.00 / 9.00
Conte Facundo / ARG / 35 / 5 / 15 / 55 / 63.64 / 9.09
5 / González Alexis / ARG / 62 / 8 / 16 / 86 / 72.09 / 9.30
Biriukov Denis / RUS / 28 / 5 / 20 / 53 / 52.83 / 9.43
Aleksiev Todor / BUL / 24 / 4 / 11 / 39 / 61.54 / 10.26
15 / Kurek Bartosz / POL / 55 / 10 / 28 / 93 / 59.14 / 10.75
Bell Cisnero Henry / CUB / 21 / 5 / 19 / 45 / 46.67 / 11.11
Amaral Dante G / BRA / 18 / 6 / 10 / 34 / 52.94 / 17.65
Receiving distribution.
More detailed receiving data for the teams from the final four are given next
Rank / Name / Team / exc / err / cont / tot / %exc / %err4 / Quiroga Rodrigo / ARG / 71 / 3 / 28 / 102 / 69.61 / 2.94
5 / González Alexis / ARG / 62 / 8 / 16 / 86 / 72.09 / 9.30
Conte Facundo / ARG / 35 / 5 / 15 / 55 / 63.64 / 9.09
Ocampo Lucas / ARG / 18 / 1 / 7 / 26 / 69.23 / 3.85
Giustiniano M / ARG / 13 / 1 / 2 / 16 / 81.25 / 6.25
2 / Endres Murilo / BRA / 91 / 2 / 34 / 127 / 71.65 / 1.57
10 / Santos Sérgio / BRA / 53 / 6 / 22 / 81 / 65.43 / 7.41
Amaral Dante G / BRA / 18 / 6 / 10 / 34 / 52.94 / 17.65
Godoy Filho G / BRA / 10 / 5 / 13 / 28 / 35.71 / 17.86
Bravo Pereira / BRA / 7 / 3 / 8 / 18 / 38.89 / 16.67
9 / Ignaczak K / POL / 85 / 9 / 33 / 127 / 66.93 / 7.09
15 / Kurek Bartosz / POL / 55 / 10 / 28 / 93 / 59.14 / 10.75
N/A / Ruciak Michal / POL / 47 / 6 / 17 / 70 / 67.14 / 8.57
Kubiak Michal / POL / 9 / 3 / 12 / 75.00 / 0.00
13 / Sokolov A / RUS / 61 / 9 / 30 / 100 / 61.00 / 9.00
16 / Khtei Taras / RUS / 37 / 5 / 26 / 68 / 54.41 / 7.35
Biriukov Denis / RUS / 28 / 5 / 20 / 53 / 52.83 / 9.43
Spiridonov A / RUS / 7 / 2 / 8 / 17 / 41.18 / 11.76
Stepanyan H / RUS / 6 / 3 / 9 / 66.67 / 0.00
Summary.
Russiahas dominated the other teams in near all play elements. They made excellent score in attack and block and were performing in service and defense they lost only a single match from Bulgaria. They are a real champion. Brazil is still on the top; they have the second strongest attack but showed less good and homogeneous performance in other elements. Real surprise was Argentine has also strong attack, the team eliminatedSerbia in the continental -and Italia in the final round .They lost the match for bronze against Poland by poor performance in attack. Poland was at third place in the continental round and took place in the final replacing Serbia as organizer of the tournament. Although missing some of their best players they improved in the final round and supported by its home public took third place by beating Argentine.
Final standing
1 / / Russia2 / / Brazil
3 / / Poland
4 / / Argentina
5 / / Bulgaria
6 / / Italy
7 / / USA
8 / / Cuba
9 / / Serbia
10 / / Finland
11 / / Germany
12 / / France
13 / / Korea
14 / / Portugal
15 / / Japan
16 / Puerto Rico
World League 2011
Finals
No / Date / Teams / Set / Result per set (points) / Total
Points / Time / Audience
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
111 / 10-Jul / ARG-POL / 0-3 / 18-25 / 23-25 / 22-25 / 63-75 / 1:31 / 10'000
112 / 10-Jul / BRA-RUS / 2-3 / 25-23 / 25-27 / 23-25 / 25-22 / 11-15 / 109-112 / 2:23 / 10'200
Semifinals
No / Date / Teams / Set / Result per set (points) / Total
Points / Time / Audience
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
109 / 09-Jul / ARG-BRA / 0-3 / 22-25 / 40-42 / 23-25 / 85-92 / 1:48 / 7'489
110 / 09-Jul / RUS-POL / 3-1 / 25-22 / 25-23 / 22-25 / 25-17 / 97-87 / 2:15 / 10'020
1