Doc. # : Korea JTC1/SC2 K2301 61E ROK Resp IRG N2179 IRGWS2015 V3
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2/IRGN2179ROKResponse
Doc. # : Korea JTC1/SC2 k2301_61e_ROK_Resp_IRG_N2179_IRGWS2015_v3
Korea JTC1/SC2, Committee on Character Codes
Authors: Shin Sanghyun, Cho Sungduk, Choi Jinswook, Heo Chul, Choi Jungdo, KIM Kyongsok
Date: 2017. 06. 02.
Status: National Body Position, Rep. of KOREA
Subject: ROK Responses to Consolidated Comments RE: IRG N2179 IRG Working Set 2015 Version 3.0
This document provides the ROK responses to Consolidated Comments RE: IRG N2179 IRG Working Set 2015 Version 3.0. This document is composed of fivetables：
1. Unifications
2. Attributes
3. Fonts and Glyphs
4. Evidences
5. Other Issues
1. Unifications
SN1 / Image1 / SN2 / Image2 / Type / Comment / KR Responses / Comment From01327 / / U+2CF4E
(F) / / Unification / U: Identical
H: KC-01343 is identical to U+2CF4E. Should they be given the same radical-stroke value, i.e. 8.9 or 62.7?
IRGN2130ExtF: / Unify. / U
04333 /
/ U+286C4 /
/ Unification / S.1.5.d
cf. UCV #215-#218
/ Unify. / SAT
04672 /
KC-04362 / U+28E9A
(B) / ?
GHZ-64141.01 / Per UCV #295
/ Unify. / U, SAT
2. Attributes
SN1 / Image1 / Type / Comment / KR Responses / Comment From00754 /
/ Radical / 00754 KC-00704: Radical 心? but based on the evidence, original glyph of ⿰土恁seems more likely; naming is usually a five element radical + a phonetic. / No change.
Radical is ⼼. / Henry
02488 /
/ Radical / Change RS from 96.11 to 200.5麻 / No change.
Radical is ⽟. / U
00791 /
/ SC / SC=14
IRGN954AR #35:
/ No change. SC=13.
Not ⺙(SC=4), but ⼡(SC=3). / H
00806 /
/ SC / SC=23 / Change SC=23 / H
02955 /
/ SC / SC=14 / Change SC=14 / T
03146 /
/ SC / 20→21 / Change SC=21 / G
03190 /
/ SC / 11→12
1→4 / Change SC=12
FS=4 / G
03429 /
/ SC / 7→8 / Change SC=8 / G
03730 /
/ SC / SC=9
IRGN954AR #35:
/ No change. SC=8.
Not ⺙(SC=4), but ⼡(SC=3). / H
03783 /
/ SC / G: 5→6
H: SC=6, FS=1
IRGN954AR #25:
Discussion record:font changed / Change SC=6.
FS=1. / G, H
03881 /
/ SC / G: 13→12
SC=12 or 13?
Code chart:
(SC=12)
(SC=12)
(SC=13)
(SC=13) / No change. SC=13. / G, H
04183 /
/ SC / SC=13
Code chart:
(SC=13)
(SC=12)
IRGN954AR #26:
Ref: Page 3, IRGN2155ROKResponse161007:
/ No change. SC=12. / H
3. Fonts and Glyphs
SN1 / Image1 / Type / Comment / KR Responses / Comment From00762 /
/ The upper right component of KC-00720 looks more like than . Should it be modified to make the second horizontal stroke clearer?
Bitmap:
Evidence: / KR will improve the quality of the glyph by making the second horizontal stroke clearer.
can be normalized to .
See IWDS No.301.
/ H00771 / / It is suggested that the last horizontal stroke of KC-00724 should be removed while that of UTC-01220 should be longer than the second last horizontal stroke as shown in the evidence. If the fonts are so modified, should they be disunified and the SC of KC-00724 be changed to 10?
Evidence:
Discussion record: / No change.
can be normalized to
See another clear evidence.
/ H
00788 / / The upper left component as shown in the evidence looks like rather than . Should KC-00773 be modified to reflect the actual shape of the font?
Evidence: / KR will change componentto . / H
00806 / / The lower left component shown in the evidence looks like rather than . Should KC-04946 be modified to reflect the actual shape of the font?
Evidence: / KR will change component to . / H
01054 / / It is suggested that KC-00986 should be modified as the middle component shown in the evidence does not merely comprise and . It looks more like (U+3802), forming the term .
Evidence:
Code chart: / Withdrawn.
KR misread evidence. / H
01059 / / It is suggested that KC-00995 should be modified as the middle component shown in the evidence looks like rather than . If the font is modified, then SC=10.
Evidence: / No change.
can be normalized to . For example, consider and , and .
See IWDS No.316.
/ H01066 / / It is suggested that KC-01028 should be modified as the right component shown in the evidence looks like rather than . If the font is modified, then SC=9, FS=4; if the font remains unchanged, FS=5.
Evidence: / No change.
can be normalized to .
See IWDS No.363.
/ H01072 / / It is suggested that one horizontal stroke should be removed from the upper right component of KC-01045 so as to reflect the actual shape of the font as shown in the evidence. If the font is modified, then SC=11.
Evidence: / No change.
See another clear evidence.
/ H
01145 / / It is suggested that KC-01124 should be modified as the upper component inside the radical looks more like than .
Evidence: / KR will change componentto . / H
03678 / / Modification should be made to KC-03739 as the top component should be rather than , and the middle component should look like rather than .
Evidence:
Code chart: / KR will change component to . / H
03859 / / According to the evidence, the right component of KC-03894 looks like rather than . Also, it is mentioned on page 11 of IRGN2155ROKResponse 161007 that KR would change the font. However, the font is yet to be changed. If the font is so changed, then SC=8.
Evidence:
Page 11, IRGN2155ROKResponse 161007:
Discussion record: / KR will change glyph and the new glyph is.
KR mistaken.
SC=8 / H
4. Evidences
SN1 / Image1 / Evidence / Comment / KR Responses / Comment From00082 / / / 00082 KC-00039: unclear evidence: 西or 覀 / Change upper component as 覀.
Personal name, pronunciation is “seol”.
The reading of upper component is “seo” and, when 乙 is added below, the reading becomes “seol”.
In general, with this type of Korea-coined Hanja for proper names, the reading of the upper does not have syllable-final and the lower part adds syllable-final.
/ Henry
00087 / / / 00087 KC-00046: unclear evidence: 目力or 助? / Not 目力, But 助.
Note. The general comment for SN1 00082 applies here too.
See another clear evidence.
/ Henry
00091 / / / 00091 KC-00053: unclear evidence: 具with three strokes? two strokes? / See another clear evidence.
/ Henry
00394 / / / 00394 KC-00299: unclear evidence: ⿲木夕木?棥? / See another clear evidence.
/ Henry
00596 / / / 00596 KC-00447: unclear evidence: 承with three strokes? two strokes? / 承has three horizontal strokes.
See another clear evidence.
/ Henry
00630 / / / 00630 KC-00502: unclear evidence: 恠or 巾? / The Upper component is 恠.
See another clear evidence.
/ Henry
04169 / / / J: Evidence is unclear to identify the right component
Henry: 04169 KC-04069: unclear evidence: right hand side / This character consists of 車 and 秉.
See another clear evidence. (enlarged/higher resolution)
/ J, Henry
04440 / / / Evidence unclear or discrepant.
The top-right component is possibly 匕rather than 十. / KR will change glyph by changing top-right componentas 匕. / SAT
04587 / / / Evidence unclear.
The inner component could be 夕, 夂etc. / The inner component is hand-writtten style of 久. For example, (玖). / SAT
04661 / / / Evidence unclear.
The left side is not determinative. / The left component is hand-written style of⻏ in this documents. For example, (陟), (陰), (隕), (隔), (阻), etc. / SAT
04672 / / / The left component is unclear in the evidence. / The left component is hand-written style of⻏ in this documents. For example, (隱), (陰), (隱), etc. / J
04807 / / / Evidence unclear.
The left side is not determinative. / KR Responded at IRG meeting #46.
See IRGN2133ConsolidatedCommentsOnCJK2015v1.1Part1_KR_Response.pdf
/ SAT
04877 / / / Evidence unclear.
The right side is not determinative. / KR Responded at IRG meeting #46.
See IRGN2133ConsolidatedCommentsOnCJK2015v1.1Part2_KR_Response.pdf
/ SAT
04954 / / / Evidence unclear.
The right side is not determinative. Also looks like 騢(U+9A22) or ?(U+29923). / No change.
KR Respons\ded at IRG meeting #46.
See IRGN2133ConsolidatedCommentsOnCJK2015v1.1Part2_KR_Response.pdf
/ SAT
05047 / / / Evidence unclear.
Also looks like ?(U+29B47). / No change.
The Under component is “星”.
KR Responded at IRG meeting #46.
See IRGN2133ConsolidatedCommentsOnCJK2015v1.1Part1_KR_Response.pdf / SAT
05131 / / / SAT: Evidence unclear.
The bottom-right portion could be 米.
Henry: 05131 KC-05955: unclear evidence: 蘖or 糵 / KR will change glyph by making the bottom-right component as ⽶.
/ SAT, Henry
05484 / / / Evidence discrepant.
The character in discussion seems to be related to 鼷(U+9F37). Therefore, automatic normalization of the right component to 亥is not immediately justified, unless it is clarified that it was the intended shape.
(
Also looks like ?(U+2A55E). / This character seems to be related to 鼷(U+9F37). But it is clear that the right component is variant of 亥, for example,(亥), (咳), (孩), (該), (駭), (骸), (荄), (賅), (劾), (核), etc. / SAT
5. Other Issues
SN1 / Image1 / Type / Comment / KR Responses / Comment From05264 / / IDS / IDS ⿰鳥歲→ ⿰鳥嵗
IDS should match the glyph. / KR will change IDS as ⿰鳥嵗 / SAT
1