Yukon Salmon Proposals

Yukon Salmon Proposals

BOARD OF FISHERIES JANUARY 2016
YUKON AND KOYUKUK RIVER PROPOSALS SCORECARD

Yukon Salmon Proposals

Organized by gear type

BEACH SEINE

Proposal 117 –Prohibit the use of beach seines in Yukon River subsistence fishing and summer chum commercial fishery
Submitted by: Tanana, Rampart, Manley Fish and Game Advisory Council
Fish and Game opinion: Neutral
Advisory Committees in support: none
Advisory Committees in opposition:Coastal/Lower Yukon, GASH, Mid-Lower Yukon, Ruby
Other comments submitted:USFWS, Yupiit of Andreafski and Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Assoc. oppose

Details: Suggested language would prohibit subsistence and commercial beach seine fishing for Yukon River king salmon, though the proponents also seem to be against beach seining for chum, due to bycatch of kings and unknown physical effect on kings who are caught and then released.

Board of Fisheries action: Failed 0-7.

Proposal 118 – Establish specifications for a legal beach seine net used for subsistence fishing on the Yukon River

Submitted by: Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Fish and Game opinion: Support
Advisory Committees in support: Coastal/Lower Yukon, Mid-Lower Yukon, Minto-Nenana, Ruby, Koyukuk River (with modifications)
Advisory Committees in opposition:none
Other comments submitted:Support from Fish and Wildlife, Yupiit of Andreafski, Yukon Delta Fisheries

Details: There are currently no restrictions on the length or depth of a beach seine. Beach seining has been allowed recently on the lower Yukon to catch summer chum during times of king salmon conservation, since kings can be released when the seine is collected and the catch is sorted. Some ACs and opponents of beach seining argue that kings may be significantly damaged by beach seines and may not survive for long after being released. This proposal would set the maximum allowable length of a subsistence beach seine at 150 fathoms (900 feet) and maximum depth at 100 meshes.GASH Advisory Council suggests that a “beach seine” of this size is too big to be called a beach seine anymore; it’s closer to purse seine in size. The Koyukuk River AC suggests that the maximum length should be 50 fathoms (300 feet), out of concern that 150 fathoms of gear is so long that kings wrapped up in one end of the net may die by the time the fishermen get there.

Board of Fisheries action: Passed 7-0 as amended. RC41 added some specs to the proposal, stipulating that a seine cannot be made of monofilament webbing. The max length remains at 150 fathoms, max length 100 meshes, and the max mesh size was amended to 4 inches. The original proposal called for 3.5 inch max mesh size, but the proponent and/or Fish and Game thought it would be best to move up to 4 inch to reduce the incidental catch of Bering Sea cisco.

Proposal 123 - Establish specifications for a legal beach seine net used for commercial fishing on the Yukon River

Submitted by: Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Fish and Game opinion: Support
Advisory Committees in support: Coastal/Lower Yukon, Mid-Lower Yukon, Minto-Nenana, Ruby (with amendments), Koyukuk River (with amendments)
Advisory Committees in opposition: none
Other comments submitted: Yupiit of Andreafski and Yukon Delta Fisheries in support

Details: This is the companion proposal to #118, applying in this case to commercial fishing. The same objections to the maximum length and depth numbers chosen by Fish and Game apply here.

Board of Fisheries action: Passed 7-0, with the same amendments as Proposal 118.

Proposal 119 – Require live release of king salmon from subsistence beach seines during times of king salmon conservation in the Yukon Area

Submitted by: Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Fish and Game opinion: Support

Advisory Committees in support:Coastal-Lower Yukon, GASH, Mid-Lower Yukon, Middle Yukon, Minto-Nenana, Ruby, Tanana Rampart Manley
Advisory Committees in opposition:none
Other comments submitted:Fish and Wildlife, Yupiit of Andreafski and Yukon Delta Fisheries in support

Details: Regulations currently require fishermen using dip nets to release king salmon alive, but do not require beach seine users to release kings. This proposal would change that to make beach seines equal to other selective gear types when it comes to returning king salmon to the water.

Board of Fisheries action: Passed 7-0.

FISH WHEELS

Proposal 115 – Allow for the retention of king salmon less than 25 inches in length in Yukon Area fish wheel subsistence fisheries

Submitted by: Fairbanks Fish and Game Advisory Committee
Fish and Game opinion: Neutral
Advisory Committees in support: Minto-Nenana, Eastern Interior, Ruby, Yukon Flats
Advisory Committees in opposition:Coastal/Lower Yukon, GASH, Mid-Lower Yukon, Middle Yukon,
Other comments submitted:Fish and Wildlife and Yukon Delta Fisheries support with modifications, Yupiit of Andreafski oppose, Koyukuk River AC took no action

Details: This proposal would only apply to subsistence fishermen using so-called “fish-friendly” fish wheels, as defined in regulations (5 AAC 05.362 Yukon River Summer Chum Salmon Management Plan). Fish friendly fish wheels must have soft surfaces in the baskets and on the chute to prevent injury to king salmon. Studies show that 90% of four year old kings (likely to be less than 25 inches in length) are males and do not contribute much to escapement or reproduction. Only a small percentage of the king run is composed of four year olds.

Board of Fisheries action: Failed 1-6. Board Chairman Kluberton and the majority of the other members felt reluctant to make any changes to the management style that is in place now. There was also some concern about altering genetic diversity of the king stock by targeting and removing small kings (less than 25 inches long), which make up about 10 percent of the run in some years. The Board agreed that a proposal like this might make more sense in the future if and when king numbers have recovered.

Proposal 116 – During times of king salmon conservation, all fish wheels would need to be attended at all times and king salmon would need to be released immediately

Submitted by: Tanana Rampart Manley Fish and Game Advisory Committee
Fish and Game opinion: Support
Advisory Committees in support: Coastal-Lower Yukon, Mid-Lower Yukon, Middle Yukon, Minto-Nenana, Eastern Interior, Yukon Flats
Advisory Committees in opposition: GASH
Other comments submitted: Fish and Wildlife Service and Yupiit of Andreafski in support

Details:This proposal would effectively eliminate the use of live boxes on fish wheels during times of king salmon conservation, when regulations require that all king salmon are to be returned the water alive. This is already part of regulations for commercial chum fishing with fish wheels during times of king salmon conservation (5 AAC 05.362 Yukon River Summer Chum Salmon Management Plan). The Tanana Rampart Manley AC in its proposal cites previous studies about the harmful impact of live boxes on king salmon survivability. Current subsistence regulations require fish wheel users to check live boxes at least once every six hours during times of king salmon conservation.

Board of Fisheries action: Passes 7-0. Substitute language (RC40) was inserted to extend the principle of immediate release to chum salmon during times of chum salmon conservation, in addition to king salmon.

SET NET

Proposal 124 – Allow 6-inch or smaller mesh gillnets in the District 6 commercial salmon fishery by emergency order

Submitted by:Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Fish and Game opinion: Support
Advisory Committees in support: Mid-Lower Yukon, Minto-Nenana, Koyukuk River
Advisory Committees in opposition: none
Other comments submitted: Yupiit of Andreafski and Yukon Delta Fisheries in support

Details:Managers do not currently have the authority to call for directed summer chum commercial openings with 6-inch mesh nets in District 6, though they do have that authority in Districts 1 and 2.

Board of Fisheries action: Passed 7-0

DRIFT NET

Proposal 113 – Prohibit the use of drift nets for fish for king salmon on all waters of the Yukon River

Submitted by: Tanana Rampart Manley Fish and Game Advisory Committee
Fish and Game opinion: Oppose
Advisory Committees in support: Yukon Flats
Advisory Committees in opposition: Coastal-Lower Yukon, GASH, Mid-Lower Yukon, Ruby
Other comments submitted: Yupiit of Andreafski and Yukon Delta Fisheries in opposition

Details:The proponents wish to make it illegal to fish for king salmon with drift nets on the Yukon, as a means to preventing further overfishing and intentional selection of large, Canadian-stock king salmon.

Board of Fisheries action: Failed unanimously, 0-7.

Proposal 121 – Allow the use of drift nets throughout all of Subdistrict 4-A on the Yukon for subsistence summer chum fishing

Submitted by: Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Fish and Game opinion: Support
Advisory Committees in support: GASH, Mid-Lower Yukon, Middle Yukon, Ruby, Koyukuk River
Advisory Committees in opposition: Tanana Rampart Manley, Yukon Flats
Other comments submitted: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Yukon Delta Fisheries in support, Yupiit of Andreafski opposed

Details:Currently summer season drift netting is only allowed in the upper portion of Subdistrict 4-A, from around Anvik to Cone Point near Bishop Rock. During times of king salmon conservation, Fish and Game can still allow drift netting to target summer chum with 6 inch mesh nets during limited openings. This proposal would allow Fish and Game to allow that in all of Subdistrict 4A. Fishermen in the lower portion of 4-A have noted that the ban on drift netting in the summer season there has prevented them from meeting their subsistence needs (with summer chum).

Board of Fisheries action: Passed 7-0.

PURSE SEINE

Proposal 126 – Add purse seines as legal gear type for commercial salmon fishing in Districts 1-3 during times of king salmon conservation

Submitted by: Kwik’pak Fisheries
Fish and Game opinion: Neutral
Advisory Committees in support: Coastal-Lower Yukon
Advisory Committees in opposition: Fairbanks, Mid-Lower Yukon, Middle Yukon, Koyukuk River, Minto-Nenana, Ruby, Tanana Rampart Manley, Yukon Flats
Other comments submitted: Yukon Delta Fisheries (Kwik’pak parent company) in support, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Yupiit of Andreafski, and various individual comments in opposition

Details:This proposal would make purse seining legal in the lower Yukon commercial fishery, as another means of targeting summer chum salmon while minimizing bycatch of king salmon. Purse seining is more common in ocean-based salmon fisheries, and usually requires a mechanical hoist. It does not set in place maximum length, depth of mesh size limits. All king salmon caught in purse seine gear would have to be returned to the water immediately and unharmed.

Board of Fisheries action: Failed 2-5. Board members added language found in RC44 to further detail what legal purse seine would be. The proposed length limit was 100 fathoms (600 feet), depth limit was 150 meshes, and mesh limit was 4 inches. The proposed amendment to original proposal also restricted the boats that could participate in a purse seine fishery to 28 feet in length, and purse seine openings could not be longer than 8 hours. All kings would have to be released to the water alive immediately. Despite these amendments to the original proposal, the proposal failed.

NEW FISHERIES

Proposal 125 – Establish a pink salmon directed commercial fishery with 4-inch mesh nets in Districts 1-3

Submitted by: Kwik’pak Fisheries
Fish and Game opinion: Neutral
Advisory Committees in support: Coastal-Lower Yukon, Mid-Lower Yukon
Advisory Committees in opposition: Ruby, Koyukuk River
Other comments submitted: Eastern Interior Regional Subsistence Advisory Council (federal) opposed, Yukon Delta Fisheries (Kwik’pak’s parent company) and Yupiit of Andreafski in support

Details:Kwik’pak Fisheries has been buying incidentally-caught pink salmon from lower river commercial fishermen since 2008, but now requests a directed pink fishery with 4 inch mesh nets, which are more appropriate to catch the smaller pink salmon compared to chum or king salmon. The pinks begin their run as the king run is just about over. As with pink runs elsewhere, Yukon pinks alternate between strong runs and weak runs, with even-numbered years showing big returns (estimated 978,000 fish past Pilot Station in 2014) and odd-numbered years having relatively few pinks. A large percentage of the pinks go to the Anvik River to spawn, and a sizeable portion go up the Andreafski. A few show up as far as Kaltag and Nulato. Commercially-viable pinks would only be caught along the coast or around Emmonak. After that, their quality is too poor to sell. Kwik’pak has found a market for Yukon pinks internationally, and estimates a price to fishermen of between 20 and 25 cents per pound in 2016. Opposition to the proposal from several advisory committees focuses on the potential for king salmon bycatch.

Board of Fisheries action: Passed 7-0, as amended. Amendments introduced in RC43 set a mesh size limit of 4 and ¾ inches, and set a time frame in which a pink salmon commercial fishery could occur: June 15 thru July 31. This seasonal restriction would limit exposure to the king salmon run, which begins earlier in June, and the fall chum/coho run, which begins in late July. The amended language also reduced the eligible area for pink salmon commercial fishing to District 1, instead of Districts 1,2, and 3.

KOYUKUK RIVER NON-SALMON PROPOSALS

Proposal 142 – Sets dates when gillnets can be used in the upper Koyukuk (south fork and middle fork)

Submitted by: Jack Reakoff
Fish and Game opinion: Neutral
Advisory Committees in support:
Advisory Committees in opposition:
Other comments submitted:

Details:Seeks to change the dates when fishermen can use gillnets in the upper Koyukuk. Currently regulations allow gillnets from November 1 through June 30. The proposed dates are August 20 through June 30. This change would give fishermen a chance to fish for non-salmon species after the chum run has ended but before freeze-up.

Board of Fisheries action: Passed 7-0.

Proposal 144 – Allow the use of gillnets to entirely block off sloughs in the Huslia area, to target northern pike

Submitted by: Jack Wholecheese
Fish and Game opinion: Oppose
Advisory Committees in support: Middle Yukon (with modifications), Koyukuk River (with modifications)
Advisory Committees in opposition: Fairbanks
Other comments submitted: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Office of Subsistence Management supports, with suggested modifications of requiring a portion of the slough to remain open for navigation and some level of fish passage, and suggests a permit system to track the harvest

Details:The original proposal would apply to Racetrack Slough, just upriver from Huslia, and sloughs off of the Huslia River. In their January 5th meeting, the Koyukuk River Advisory Committee agreed to amend the proposal to apply to “all sloughs that don’t have salmon that are adjacent to the Koyukuk Drainage from the mouth to the south fork.” Proponent Jack Wholecheese from Huslia argues that stretching a net across an entire slough is an old technique used for controlling the pike population and providing large numbers of pike for subsistence. The nets are set when the pike typically move out of inland lakes and sloughs and toward the mainstem Koyukuk River – in late May and early June. This technique has been illegal for at least 60 years. Fish and Game is opposed due to concerns for overharvesting pike and catching nontarget species like whitefish, grayling, sheefish and suckers.

Board of Fisheries action: Passed 4-3 with amendments. Language was added to the original proposal (as written in RC57) to not allow nets to entirely block sloughs, but instead to leave at least 20 feet of water open for boats and some fish passage. The federal Office of Subsistence Management made a similar suggestion in its pre-meeting written comments. Board Member Orville Huntington, from Huslia, spoke in favor of the amended proposal. Fish and Game remained opposed, due to the fact it still violates a general regulation that no more than half of a waterway can be obstructed with a net. The Koyukuk River Advisory Committee’s desire to apply the proposal to almost all of the Koyukuk River drainage was not incorporated. Board Member Sue Jeffrey from Kodiak cast the final and deciding vote in favor.

ADJUSTMENTS TO MANAGEMENT PLANS

Proposal 107 – Close the Yukon River summer chum commercial fishery as a means of protecting king salmon

Submitted by: Tanana, Rampart, Manley Advisory Committee

Board action: Failed unanimously (0-7)

Proposal108 – Reduce the trigger points for the summer chum commercial fishery to occur at various rates of exploitation