Rationale for Prolonged Glucocorticoid Treatment in ARDS

Rationale for Prolonged Glucocorticoid Treatment in ARDS

Supplementary Material

Prolonged methylprednisolone treatment is associated with improved ARDS outcomes: analysis of individual patients’ data from four randomized trials and review of the literature.

Rationale for prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in ARDS

In ARDS, resolution of inflammation and restoration of tissue homeostasis is an active, continuous and coordinated process (switch from production of pro-inflammatory towards pro-resolving molecules [1]) – characterized by non-phlogistic elimination of granulocytes by apoptosis, restoration of the alveolar-capillary membrane’s integrity, resorption of edema, increased surfactant production, decreased clotting and fibroproliferation with resolution of intra-alveolar and interstitial granulation tissue [2, 3]- that can be accelerated by prolonged glucocorticoid treatment [4].There is a strong scientific foundation in support of prolonged methylprednisolone treatment in ARDS (see Supplementary Material), with evidence showing that treatment positively affects all "layers" – pathogenesis (biology - core stratum), morphology (histology – intermediate stratum) and clinical (physiology - outer stratum) – of the disease process [5].

In ARDS, inadequate GC-glucocorticoid receptor  (GR) -mediated down-regulation of pro-inflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor-B (NF-B) in circulating and tissue cells leads to persistent elevation over time (> 4 weeks) in plasma and bronchoalveloar lavage (BAL) markers of inflammation, hemostasis, and tissue repair (maladaptive repair)[3]. Experimental ARDS is associated with a significant reduction in lung tissue GRnumber and binding capacity, and glucocorticoid treatment – contrary to placebo - restores GRnumber and function leading to resolution of pulmonary inflammation [6]. Moreover, alveolar macrophages extracted from patients with established ARDS have decreased 11β-HSD oxo-reductase activity with decreased conversion of cortisone to cortisol [7].

In an ex-vivo study, we have shown that prolonged methylprednisolone treatment – contrary to placebo – was associated with upregulation in GRnumber and nuclear translocation with reduction in NF-B DNA-binding and transcription of inflammatory cytokines [8]. ARDS patients randomized to prolonged methylprednisolone treatment, contrary to placebo, demonstrated a sustained reduction in plasma and/ or BAL levels of tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6 [3], IL-8, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [3], procollagenaminoterminalpropeptide type I and III [3], indices of alveolar-capillary membrane permeability (BAL albumin, total protein, and percentage neutrophils) [9], and an increase in IL-10 [3], protein C [10], and surfactant [11].

Contrary to older trials investigating a time-limited massive daily methylprednisolone dose[12], low-to-moderate dose glucocorticoid treatment was not found – in this study and prior meta-analyses [12, 13] - to be associated with increased risk for nosocomial infections. Lowering systemic and pulmonary inflammation might lower the risk for developing nosocomial infection by (i) decreasing duration of MV and ICU stay, (ii) achieving an inflammatory milieu less favorable to intra and extra cellular growth of bacterial pathogens frequently encountered (Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobactersps.) [14], and (iii) improving opsonization-dependent phagocytic neutrophil function [15] and intracellular killing [16].

Methods

In the methylprednisolone RTCs (Table S1), protocols allowed for early discontinuation of study drug for development of complications (shock[17], disseminated fungal infection[17, 18], gastro-intestinal bleeding requiring transfusion[18, 19]) or to received glucocorticoid treatment (failure to improved lung injury score (LIS)[20] variables within 7-14 days of randomization[18, 19], or development of life-threatening conditions requiring glucocorticoid treatment [18, 19]. Per protocol, duration of glucocorticoid treatment after removal of AB (Table S2) was up to 14 days in the early ARDS trials[19, 21], and varied between 18 days [18]and 0-4 days[17]in the late ARDS trials.

Mechanical ventilation and ICU-free days to day 28 for patients who die before or on study day 28 was set to 0, and for patients surviving beyond day 28 was defined as the number of days (1-to-28) that the patient was successfully without MV or outside the ICU. Return to AB or ICU were included in the calculation of total duration of MV or ICU stay to study day 28. Timing of and reason for return to AB or ICU were available in two trials[18, 19], and not available in the ARDS network trial[17]. For return to AB before study day 28, we applied the ARDS network trial’s definition[17] (study termination form - CRF instructions version 3; 7/6/01) stating if the patient achieved 48 hours of UAB but returned to assisted breathing before day 28, record the number of calendar dates on which the patient received AB for any period of time.

We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for reports in any language published before March 1, 2015, using the search terms “acute lung injury,” “acute respiratory distress syndrome,” “acute respiratory failure,” “pneumonia,” “steroids,” “glucocorticoids,” and ”corticosteroids.” We identified four trials [17-19, 21] that investigated prolonged methylprednisolone and four trials [22-25] that investigated prolonged hydrocortisone treatment in ARDS. The updated literature search identified four randomized trials investigating prolonged hydrocortisone treatment in patients with early ARDS [22-24]. The largest study[23] is a post hoc analysis of 177 patients with ARDS from a trial of vasopressor-dependent septic shock [26]. In this trial [26], the subgroup (n=129) of non-responders to a short corticotropin test, contrary to responders (n=48) had – in response to hydrocortisone treatment - more days alive without AB (5.6 ± 8.8 vs. 2.6 ± 6.6; p =0.006) and improved survival (47% vs. 25%; p =0.021). One small trial (Chines language) investigated patients with early ARDS and critical illness corticosteroid insufficiency [25]. This trial reported a non-significant reduction in ICU mortality 17% vs. 50% (p>0.05) [25]. The other two trials[22, 24] of patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia included 94 patients on mechanical ventilation with early ARDS. In both trials [22, 24], hydrocortisone treatment was associated with significant reduction in duration of AB; one trial reported improved survival [22]. With the exception of hyperglycemia, glucocorticoid treatment was not associated with increased rate of side effects.

Results

Patients’ baseline characteristics of the four trials investigating prolonged methylprednisolone treatment in ARDS are shown in Table S1.Reason for discontinuing study drug before achieving UAB was available in 14 patients in the ARDS network trial[17] (11 shock, 3fungal infections) and in the seven patients of the early ARDS trial[19] (failure to improve with cross-over to open label methylprednisolone (2), HIV - exclusion criteria - diagnosed after study entry, withdrawal of care (2), family request, and vasculitis).

The methylprednisolone-treated group had a significantly shorter duration (days) of initial AB by day 28 (Table S2). The ARDS network trial was the only trial with more patients randomized to active drug that returned to assisted breathing after rapid tapering. In the ARDS network trial (N = 20),[17] reasons for return to AB were not provided. In the other ARDS trials (N = 8)[18, 19], none of the patients that returned to AB had recrudescence of ARDS; reasons for return to AB included: 3 severe sepsis (1 septic shock), 2 difficulty-clearing secretions (1 placebo), 1 cardiogenic pulmonary edema, 1 post-operative observation, and 1 pleural effusion with lung trapping[18, 19].

The methylprednisolone-treated group also had significantly more patients discharged alive from the ICU by day 28 (Table S3). The ARDS network trial[17] was the only trial with more patients randomized to active drug that returned to the ICU. For the ARDS network trial[17], reasons for return to ICU were not available; ten of 18 patients that retuned to ICU also returned to AB.[17] In the other three trials[18, 19, 21], seven patients returned to ICU (one placebo), 5 for return to AB (see above), 1 for postoperative observation, and 1 for cardiac event; 2 died (active drug). Tables S4show the Cox Proportional Hazard Models for all patients and patients randomized before day 14 of ARDS onset with Competing Risk adjustment for time to hospital death by Day-28.

For the trial-level meta-analysis, we evaluated risk of bias for each important outcome (Table S5). Subgroup analyses are described in Table S6. RCTs enrolling <60 patients had consistently larger effect estimates across all beneficial outcomes. The one single-blind RCT and the one trial published after 2010 had a larger effect estimate, but these subgroup findings are less credible because they were not consistent across outcomes and the p-values are relatively large (p=0.02 for both). There were no differences for any other subgroup analysis. In a sensitivity analysis excluding RCTs with a sequential stopping rule [18, 19, 22],the benefits of glucocorticoids did not retain statistical significance for ICU-free days or mortality. This was also true for mortality when the sensitivity analysis was restricted to RCTs with ≥60 patients (mortality RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.01).Mechanical ventilation-free day was robust to exclusion of studies with sequential stopping rules.

TABLES

Table S1. Randomized trials investigating prolonged methylprednisolone treatment in ARDS: Baseline characteristics of the four trials investigating prolonged methylprednisolone treatment in ARDS.
Variable / Meduri et al. [19]
2007 / Rezk et al. [21]
2013† / Meduri et al. [18]
1998 / Steinberg et al. [17]
2006
Timing of ARDS / Early severe ARDS / Early severe ARDS / Unresolving ARDS / Persistent ARDS
Number of patients / 63 vs. 28 / 18 vs. 9 / 16 vs. 8 / 89 vs. 91
Age / 51.0 ± 15.3 / 47.9 ± 14.0 / 48.8 ± 16.4 / 49.1 ± 17.7
Male gender - n (%)‡ / 47 (52) / 23 (85) / 10 (42) / 89 (49)
Vasopressor-dependent shock / 27 (30) / N.A. / 10 (42) / 15 (8)
SOFA score § / 6.8 ± 2.8 / N.A. / 8.3 ± 2.4 / 7.9 ± 2.8
Initial PaO2:FiO2 / 118.4 ± 51.2 / 80.5 ±16.0 / 161 ± 14 / 126 ± 42
Initial PEEP / 13 ± 5.0 / 10.2 ± 3.2 / 12 ± 1.2 / 12 ± 5.6
Patient population / Medical -Surgical / Pneumonia and trauma / Medical -Surgical / Medical –Surgical-Trauma
Infection surveillance / Yes / N.R. / Yes / No
Primary Outcome / Improvement in LIS by day 7 / Improvement in LIS by day 14 / Improvement in LIS by day 14 / 60-day mortality
until discharge home
Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; PaO2:FiO2, ratios of PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2); SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; LIS, lung injury score; N.A., not available; N.R., not reported.
†The data from Rezk et al. [21] were obtained directly from the manuscript.
‡ Male gender for methylprednisolone vs. placebo: 34 (54) vs. 13 (46) [19], 16 (89) vs. 7 (78) [21], 6 (38) vs. 4 (50) [18], and 36 (40) vs. 53 (58) [17].
§ SOFA score for methylprednisolone vs. placebo: 6.6 ± 2.6 vs.7.3 ± 3.4 [19],8.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.8 ± 1.3 [18], and 8.0 ± 2.6 vs. 7.8 ± 3.1 [17].
Table S2. Randomized trials investigating prolonged methylprednisolone treatment in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Study treatment protocol and actual duration of study treatment.
Variable / Meduri et al. [19]2007 / Rezk et al. [21]2013 / Meduri et al. [18]1998 / Steinberg et al. [17]
2006
Timing of ARDS / Early severe ARDS / Early severe ARDS / Unresolving ARDS / Persistent ARDS
Number randomized to methylprednisolone vs. placebo / 63 vs. 28 / 18 vs. 9 / 16 vs. 8 / 89 vs. 91
Initial loading dose / 1 mg/Kg / 1 mg/Kg / 2 mg/Kg / 2 mg/Kg
Daily methylprednisolone dosage and duration of treatment by protocol / 1 mg/Kg - 14 days
0.5 mg/Kg - 7 days followed by 6 days taper †‡ / 1 mg/Kg - 14 days
0.5 mg/Kg - 7 days followed by 6 days taper †‡ / 2 mg/Kg -14 days
1 mg/Kg - 7 days
0.5 mg/Kg - 7 days
followed by 4 days taper † / 2 mg/Kg -14 days
1 mg/Kg - 7 days
followed by 4 days taper §
Duration of treatment by protocol after patients achieved UAB ¶ / Up to 13 days / Up to 13 days / Up to 18 days / 0-4 days §
Mean (SD) duration (days) of treatment (N = 322) / 18.7 ± 8.7 / 24.9 ± 2.5 / 27.1 ± 7.7 / 13.1 ± 7.1
p<0.001*
Mean (SD) duration (days) of treatment (N = 278) || / 20.9 ± 7.3 / 25.2 ± 2.5 / 29.6 ± 3.6 / 13.8 ± 7.0
p<0.001*
Number of patients with treatment discontinued before achieving initial UAB (N = 262) UAB¶ / 7 (2 vs. 5) / 0 / 0 / 31 (9 vs. 22)
p=1.0*
Mean (SD) duration (days) of tapering after patients achieved initial UAB (N=183) # / 14.4 ± 2.4 / 12.2 ± 3.0 / 15.8 ± 4.8 / 3.1 ± 1.1
p<0.001*
Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; UAB, unassisted breathing.
Data in parentheses are (methylprednisolone vs. placebo)
† If the patient was extubated before day 14, treatment was advanced to day 15 of drug therapy and tapered according to schedule.
‡ Two trials administered the study drug as an infusion [19, 21].
§ If the patient was receiving 2 mg/kg/day (day 1-14): two days rapid taper. If the patient was receiving 1 mg/kg/day (day 15-21): either slow taper over 4 days or rapid taper over 2 days. If the patient was receiving 0.5 mg/kg/day (day 22-25): discontinuation. Clinicians were allowed to taper more rapidly or discontinue immediately if deemed necessary.
|| Modified ITT (intention-to-treat) excludes 44 patients that had treatment discontinued at death while on initial AB: 15 (9 vs. 6)[19] and 3 (0 vs. 3)[21] in the early ARDS trials and 3 (0 vs. 3)[18] and 23 (11 vs. 12)[17] in the late ARDS trials.
¶Excludes 44 patients that had treatment discontinued at death while on initial AB (see §), and 16 patientsthat had treatment protocol completed before achieving UAB (only applicable to study by Steinberg at al., 2006 [17]).
# Among patients (N = 183) who were on study treatment when they achieved UAB by day 28: 61 (49 vs. 12)[19] and 24 (18 vs. 6)[21] in the early ARDS trials, and 18 (15 vs. 3)[18] and 80 (48 vs. 32)[17] in the late ARDS trials.
* p value in comparison to other trials
Table S3.Randomized trials investigating prolonged methylprednisolone treatment in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Effects of treatment on secondary outcomes in each trial.
Variable / Meduri et al. [19]
2007 / Rezk et al. [21]
2013 / Meduri et al. [18]
1998 / Steinberg et al. [17]
2006
Methylprednisolone / Placebo / Methylprednisolone / Placebo / Methylprednisolone / Placebo / Methylprednisolone / Placebo
Number / 63 / 28 / 18 / 9 / 16 / 8 / 89 / 91
Died before achieving initial UAB by day 28 – n (%) / 9 (14)
p=0.020‡ / 10 (36) / 0
p=0.029† / 3 (33) / 0 p=0.028† / 3 (38) / 14 (16) p=0.113‡ / 23 (25)
Alive on day 28 on initial AB with no UAB / 3 (5)
p=0.20 † / 4 (14) / 0
NA / 0 / 1 (6)
p=0.25† / 2 (25) / 10 (11)
p=0.0201‡ / 23 (25)
Achieved initial UAB by day 28 – n (%) / 51 (81) p=0.005‡ / 14 (50) / 18 (100) p=0.029 † / 6 (67) / 15 (94) p=0.007† / 3 (38) / 65 (73) p=0.001‡ / 45 (49)
Duration of initial AB (days) up to day 28 – mean ± SD / 7.5 ± 5.7 p<0.001 / 13.6 ± 9.0 / 10.6 ± 2.9 p<0.001 / 21.2 ± 2.2 / 13.6 ± 6.6 p=0.270 / 17.1 ± 8.6 / 12.1 ± 8.7 p<0.001 / 16.7 ± 9.0
Returned to ABby day 28 § – n (%) / 6 (12)
p=1.000† / 1 (8) / 0
NA / 0 / 1 (7)
p=1.000† / 0 / 17 (26)
p=0.008‡ / 3 (7)
Mechanical ventilation– free days to day 28 – mean ± SD / 15.9 ± 9.6 p<0.001 / 7.9 ± 9.5 / 17.4 ± 2.9 p<0.001 / 5.1 ± 4.1 / 12.4 ± 8.1 p=0.017 / 4.0 ± 6.1 / 10.3 ± 9.7 p=0.009 / 6.7 ± 8.6
Duration of initial AB including data past day 28 – mean ± SD / 10.4 ± 19.2
p=0.051 / 20.2 ± 26.6 / 10.6 ± 2.9
p<0.001 / 21.2 ± 2.2 / 18.6 ± 24.4
p=0.434 / 27.3 ± 26.6 / 14.1 ± 1.7||
p = 0.006 / 23.6 ± 2.9
Shock after study entry – n (%) / 1 (2)
p=1.000† / 0 / 0
NA / 0 / 0
NA / 0 / 5 (6)
p=0.002 ‡ / 20 (22)
Patients with new infection after study entry – n (%) / 27 (43)
p=0.116‡ / 17 (61) / 0
p=0.029† / 3 (33) / 12 (75)
p=1.000† / 6 (75) / 20 (22)
p=0.116‡ / 30 (33)
Discharged alive from the intensive care unit by day 28 – n (%) / 49 (78)
p=0.007‡ / 13 (46) / 18 (100)
p=0.029† / 6 (67) / 14 (88)
p=0.021† / 3 (38) / 58 (65)
p=0.025‡ / 44 (48)
Re-admission to the intensive care unit by day 28 – n (%) ¶ / 5 (11)
p=1.000† / 1 (8) / 0
NA / 0 / 1 (8)
p=1.000† / 0 / 11 (21)
p=0.007‡ / 1 (2)
Intensive care unit– free days to day 28 / 13.1 ± 9.1
p<0.001 / 6.1 ± 8.0 / 15.2 ± 2.9
p<0.001 / 3.3 ± 3.0 / 9.4 ± 7.5
p=0.043 / 3.0 ± 5.3 / 8.4 ± 8.4
p=0.082 / 6.3 ± 7.8
Hospital– free days to day 28 / 8.8 ± 8.3
p<0.001 / 2.8 ± 5.9 / 12.4 ± 3.1
p<0.001 / 1.3 ± 1.4 / 5.5± 7.1
p=0.107 / 1.1 ± 2.1 / 4.0 ± 6.1
p=0.375 / 3.2 ± 5.7
Hospitalmortality - n (%) / 15 (24)
p=0.066 ‡ / 12 (43) / 0
p=0.029† / 3 (33) / 2 (12)
p=0.021† / 5 (62) / 20 (22)
p=0.439‡ / 25 (27)
Hospitalmortality for those randomized before ARDS day 14 - n (%) / 15 (24)
p=0.066‡ / 12 (43) / 0
p=0.029† / 3 (33) / 4 (25)
p=0.052 † / 5 (62) / 38 (31)
p=0.124‡ / 48 (44)
Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; AB, assisted breathing (AB); UAB, unassisted breathing; NA = not applicable.
† Fisher's exact test; ‡ Chi-square test. As we conducted multiple tests of similar nature, a more conservative threshold of 0.001 must be used as the significance level for these results.
§ Patients that returned to AB among the 215 patients that achieved AB by day 28.
|| Data provided directly by the ARDS network[17].
¶ Re-admission to intensive care unit by day 28 among those that were discharged from the ICU.
Table S4. Time to hospital death by Day-28 from Cox Proportional Hazard Models for all patients (N = 322) and patients randomized before day 14 (N = 272) of ARDS onset.
No. / Model / Death (Overall) / Death
(randomization before Day 14)§
HR (95% CI) / P Value / HR (95% CI) / P Value
1 / Treatment (methylprednisolone vs. placebo) † / 0.62 (0.39, 0.98) / 0.040 / 0.51 (0.32-0.83) / 0.006
2 / Treatment, Initiation of treatment, tapering, and baseline characteristics ‡
Treatment (methylprednisolone vs. placebo) / 0.65 (0.41, 1.04) / 0.075 / 0.55 (0.34-0.90) / 0.016
Initiation of treatment (early[11, 13] vs. late[9, 10]) / 1.57 (0.59, 4.20) / 0.37 / 1.45 (0.54-3.87) / 0.46
Tapering (Slow vs. Rapid) / 0.69 (0.27, 1.74) / 0.43 / 0.64 (0.25-1.63) / 0.35
Gender (male vs. female) / 1.22 (0.77, 1.94) / 0.40 / 1.36 (0.83-2.21) / 0.22
SOFA score (>7 vs. ≤7) / 1.54 (0.96, 2.46) / 0.075 / 1.70 (1.03-2.80) / 0.036
Age (>55 vs. ≤55) / 3.46 (2.14, 5.59) / <0.001 / 3.02 (1.83-4.97) / <0.001
3 / Treatment and baseline characteristics ‡
Treatment (methylprednisolone vs. placebo) / 0.64 (0.41, 1.02) / 0.059 / 0.54 (0.33-0.87) / 0.012
SOFA (>7 vs. ≤7) / 1.50 (0.94, 2.38) / 0.088 / 1.70 (1.04-2.77) / 0.034
Age (>55 vs. ≤55) / 3.51 (2.18, 5.65) / <0.001 / 3.09 (1.88-5.06) / <0.001
Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.
† Adjusted for Study stratification
‡ Baseline characteristic include age categories (≤55 and >55), gender, SOFA categories (≤7 and >7). The baseline characteristic data are not available from study from Rezk et al.[21]from which 27 subjects are excluded from the full analysis in Models 1 to 3 (N = 322). The cutoff points for the age and SOFA categories were determined by the martingale residual plots from the Cox model.
§Compared with the overall analysis, 50 subjects who were randomized after Day 13 are excluded.
Table S5. Risk of bias assessment for randomized trials investigating prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Author, year / Random number generation? / Allocation adequately concealed? / Adequate blinding? / Attrition infrequent? / Free of evidence of selective reporting? / Free of other meaningful bias? / Industry funded?
Annane, 2006 / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / No
Confalonieri, 2005 / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / No: sequential stopping rule / No
Liu, 2012 / Yes / Probably yes / Probably no / Yes / Yes / Yes / No
Meduri, 1998 / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / No: sequential stopping rule† / No
Meduri, 2007 / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / No: sequential stopping rule† / No
Rezk, 2013 / Yes / Probably yes / No / Yes / Yes / Yes / No
Sabry, 2011 / Probably yes / Probably yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / No
Steinberg, 2006 / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Yes / Probably yes‡ / No
† We considered rating this trial high risk because the protocol allowed blinded cross-over between groups. However, most patients moved from the placebo arm to the glucocorticoid arm, which if it did have an effect, would be expected to decrease the effect size. Moreover, the effect on mortality was robust to the exclusion of cross-over patients in the individual patient-data meta-analysis.
‡ Possible selection bias: the RCT recruited a small proportion (5%) of eligible patients.
Table S6 .Subgroup and sensitivity analyses for the trial-level meta-analysis of prolonged glucocorticoid treatment in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Outcome / Subgroup / Relative risk, 95% CI / Interaction P
Mortality, randomized before 14 days
Adequately blinded (n=6) / 0.60 (0.39-0.92)
Single-blind (n=2) / 0.25 (0.07-0.87) / 0.20
Excluding RCTs stopped for benefit (n=5) † / 0.65 (0.40-1.03) / 0.54
≥60 patients (n=4) / 0.76 (0.59-0.98)
<60 patients (n=4) / 0.22 (0.09-0.52) / 0.006
Published before 2010 (n=5) / 0.61 (0.38-0.96)
Published after 2010 (n=3) / 0.31 (0.12-0.82) / 0.22
Methylprednisolone (n=4) / 0.54 (0.27-1.06)
Hydrocortisone (n=4) / 0.41 (0.34-0.88) / 0.97
Mortality, all patients
Adequately blinded (n=6) / 0.25 (0.07-0.87)
Single-blind (n=2) / 0.64 (0.42-0.97) / 0.16
Excluding RCTs stopped for benefit (n=5) † / 0.73 (0.50-1.08) / 0.36
≥60 patients (n=4) / 0.82 (0.69-0.99)
<60 patients (n=4) / 0.21 (0.09-0.50) / 0.002
Published before 2010 (n=5) / 0.65 (0.42-1.01)
Published after 2010 (n=3) / 0.31 (0.12-0.82) / 0.18
Methylprednisolone (n=4) / 0.51 (0.27-0.97)
Hydrocortisone (n=4) / 0.52 (0.25-1.09) / 0.95
Nosocomial infections
Adequately blinded (n=6) / 0.78 (0.56-1.03)
Single-blind (n=2) / 0.47 (0.02-14.25) / 0.77
Excluding RCTs stopped for benefit (n=5) † / 0.72 (0.37-1.41) / 0.86
≥60 patients (n=4) / 0.73 (0.55-0.97)
<60 patients (n=4) / 0.53 (0.11-2.62) / 0.70
Published before 2010 (n=5) / 0.79 (0.62-1.02)
Published after 2010 (n=3) / 0.31 (0.03-3.15) / 0.43
Methylprednisolone (n=4) / 0.84 (0.56-1.24)
Hydrocortisone (n=4) / 0.59 (0.22-1.53) / 0.50
Mechanical ventilation-free days / Mean difference, 95% CI
Adequately blinded (n=5) / 6.06 (2.15-9.98)
Single-blind (n=2) / 6.84 (-2.27-15.94) / 0.88
Excluding RCTs stopped for benefit (n=4) † / 4.13 (-1.48-9.75) / 0.50
≥60 patients (n=3) / 3.26 (0.11-6.42)
<60 patients (n=4) / 9.81 (6.86-12.76) / 0.003
Published before 2010 (n=5) / 6.84 (-2.27-15.94)
Published after 2010 (n=2) / 6.06 (2.15-9.98) / 0.88
Methylprednisolone (n=4) / 7.41 (2.20-12.62)
Hydrocortisone (n=3) / 5.02 (-2.15-12.19) / 0.60
Intensive care unit-free days
Adequately blinded (n=4) / 6.31 (2.25-12.22)
Single-blind (n=1) / 11.90 (9.53-14.27) / 0.02
Excluding RCTs stopped for benefit (n=2) † / 7.00 (-2.61-16.60) / 0.90
≥60 patients (n=2) / 4.33 (-0.43-9.11)
<60 patients (n=3) / 10.49 (7.41-13.57) / 0.03
Published before 2010 (n=4) / 6.31 (2.25-10.38)
Published after 2010 (n=1) / 11.90 (9.53-14.27) / 0.02
Methylprednisolone (n=4) / 6.87 (1.65-12.09)
Hydrocortisone (n=1) / 11.30 (6.08-16.52) / 0.24
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval, RCT, randomized controlled trial.
† Sensitivity analysis, interaction P is calculated versus random-effects estimate with all trials

FIGURES

Figure S1. Patients, in each trial, alive on study day 8, 15, 22, and 29 that received at least at least 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of methylprednisolone treatment.

Legend: N value within each column reports patients alive on the specified day.

* = P < 0.001 in comparison to the other three trials

Figure S2.Probability of achieving (initial) unassisted breathing (methylprednisolone vs. placebo) from randomization to day 28 in trials with early vs. late initiation of treatment.

Legend: Cumulative incidenceestimates - adjusted for competing risk - of the probability of achieving (initial) unassisted breathing by day 28 for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in trials with early ( 3 days) vs. late (5 days) initiation of treatment.

Figure S3. Effects of prolonged glucocorticoid treatment on mechanical ventilation-free days (n= 510) and intensive care unit-free days (n= 354) at day 28.