Pooled Analysis of Smoking, Alcohol, and Caffeine

Pooled Analysis of Smoking, Alcohol, and Caffeine

Appendix

Bias analysis

Methods. In addition, we conducted probabilistic bias analysis to formally address the potential for uncontrolled confounding of the PD-smoking association; i.e. we performed “reverse” bias analysis posing the question “what would be characteristics of a confounder (U) that could explain away/nullify the observed smoking/nicotine PD associations?” using previously published bias adjustment formulas (REF: Arah et al. (2008); for examples see Sudan et al Ped Perinat Epidemiol 2013; Parriott & Arah 2013).

We specified varying distributions (prevalence) of a binary risk factor U within categories of smoking and nicotine use and then solved the formulas for the odds ratio of the U-PD association. As depicted in the DAG, the U prevalence was chosen to represent a negative relationship with smoking and nicotine and a positive relationship with PD (see figure e-1). At each given scenario the output is the OR showing how strong the association between U and PD would have to be to nullify the observed smoking–PD associations.

Results. In the supplemental Table e-1 we present results of our bias analysis illustrating the distribution and strength of association (with PD) that would be required for a plausible PD risk factor U to explain the reported smoking-PD associations. E.g. a factor U highly prevalent among never-smokers (70%), less among former smokers (30%), and rare among current smokers (5%) would have to be strongly associated with PD (OR=5.93) to nullify the observed OR of 0.28 among current smokers (see scenario 1). With U less prevalent among never-smokers (e.g. 35%) and rare among former smokers (5%) and current smokers (1%), the U-PD association OR would need to be even larger (9.18) to reduce the OR of 0.28 to 1.Parallel findings apply for the use of nicotine substitutes.

Table e-1: Reverse bias analysis of the smoking-Parkinson’s and nicotine-Parkinson’s associations exploring plausible characteristics of an uncontrolled confounding binary variable or risk factor (U), that, when adjusted for, would explain away the observed association between smoking/nicotine and Parkinson’s disease (assuming true null associations)

Observed OR for the smoking-Parkinson’s association / Assumedtrue (U) adjusted odds ratio for the association between smoking or nicotine and Parkinson’s / Assumed prevalence of U=1 within smoking /nicotine categories / Estimated OR (95% confidence interval) for the association between U and Parkinson’s
Scenario 1
Smoking
-Never smoked / Reference / Reference / 70% / –
-Former smoker / 0.65 (0.56 – 0.76) / 1 / 30% / 3.26 (2.81 – 3.81)
-Current smoker / 0.28 (0.22 – 0.34) / 1 / 5% / 5.93 (4.66 – 7.20)
Nicotine
-Never used nicotine / 1 / Reference / 80% / –
-Used nicotine / 0.54 (0.38 – 0.76) / 1 / 30% / 4.48 (3.17 – 6.34)
Scenario 2
Smoking
-Never smoked / Reference / Reference / 65% / –
-Former smoker / 0.65 (0.56 – 0.76) / 1 / 35% / 5.83 (5.02 – 6.81)
-Current smoker / 0.28 (0.22 – 0.34) / 1 / 5% / 6.45 (5.07 – 7.84)
Nicotine
-Never used nicotine / 1 / Reference / 65% / –
-Used nicotine / 0.54 (0.38 – 0.76) / 1 / 25% / 5.55 (3.93 – 7.86)
Scenario 3
Smoking
-Never smoked / Reference / Reference / 60% / –
-Former smoker / 0.65 (0.56 – 0.76) / 1 / 25% / 3.50 (3.02 – 4.09)
-Current smoker / 0.28 (0.22 – 0.34) / 1 / 3% / 6.22 (4.89 – 7.55)
Nicotine
-Never used nicotine / 1 / Reference / 65% / –
-Used nicotine / 0.54 (0.38 – 0.76) / 1 / 15% / 3.29 (2.33 – 4.65)
Scenario 4
Smoking
-Never smoked / Reference / Reference / 50% / –
-Former smoker / 0.65 (0.56 – 0.76) / 1 / 15% / 3.00 (2.58 – 3.51)
-Current smoker / 0.28 (0.22 – 0.34) / 1 / 2% / 7.00 (5.50 – 8.50)
Nicotine
-Never used nicotine / 1 / Reference / 40% / –
-Used nicotine / 0.54 (0.38 – 0.76) / 1 / 10% / 4.97 (3.51 – 7.02)
Scenario 5
Smoking
-Never smoked / Reference / Reference / 35% / –
-Former smoker / 0.65 (0.56 – 0.76) / 1 / 5% / 2.97 (2.56 – 3.47)
-Current smoker / 0.28 (0.22 – 0.34) / 1 / 1% / 9.18 (7.21 – 9.18)
Nicotine
-Never used nicotine / 1 / Reference / 30% / –
-Used nicotine / 0.54 (0.38 – 0.76) / 1 / 5% / 5.11 (3.61 – 7.22)

Figuree-1: Signed directed acyclic graph showing hypothesized directionality of effects of an unknown powerful risk factor for Parkinson’sDisease, and assuming no causal effects of smoking and nicotine on Parkinson’s

Page 1