National Health Care Reform

National Health Care Reform: A Brief Update

National Health Care Reform: A Brief Update

Note: All information is current as of June 8, 2010 and may change as more

details and implementing regulations become available.

On March 23, 2010 President Obama signed historic national health care reform legislation (HR 3590, the patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) that may have a profound effect on health care delivery in California, including impact on some of the cuts proposed by Governor Schwarzenegger in the draft budget released in January. Follow-up legislation passed the following week clarified and expanded reform provisions in the original bill.

The Basics

In short, the health reform package will:

require most U.S. citizens and legal residents to have health insurance;
create state-based AmericanHealth Benefit Exchanges through which individuals can purchase coverage, with premium and cost-sharingcredits available to individuals and families with income between 133-400% of the Federal Poverty Level (the 2009 FPL is $18,310 for a family of three);
create separate Exchanges throughwhich small businesses can purchase coverage;
require employers to pay penalties for employees whoreceive tax credits for health insurance through an Exchange, with exceptions for small employers;
impose new regulations on health plans in the Exchanges and in the individual and small group markets; and
expand Medicaid income eligibility to 133% of the FPL.

Simply put, the health insurance exchanges will be new state-based entities that provide a more organized and competitive market for health insurance, with a large enough risk pool to make the insurance more affordable. There will be a choice of plans, common rules for the plans’ benefits and prices, and information to help consumers better understand the options.

The package will extend health insurance coverage to 32 million uninsured residents at an estimated cost of $940 billion over 10 years, according to an updated analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The measure still would leave 23 million U.S. residents without coverage by 2019, one-third of whom would be undocumented immigrants. According to the CBO, the measure would lower the federal deficit by $143 billion over the first 10 years and by more than $1 trillion over the second 10-year period, primarily by “bending the curve” in our steadily increasing health care costs.

Immediate Reform Provisions

Most provisions in the reform package will take effect on January 1, 2014, but some provisions take effect immediately and others will be implemented within six months.

As of the date of enactment (3/23/10):

States must maintain at minimum the Medicaid (Medi-Cal) and SCHIP (Healthy Families) eligibility and enrollment procedures (e.g. number of eligibility re-certifications required per year) currently in place.
Small employers (up to 25 employees) can receive tax credits covering 35% of health care premiums; the tax credit increases to 50% by 2014.

By June 24, 2010:

A temporary high-risk pool in each state must provide qualified uninsured people with pre-existing conditions the opportunity to obtain coverage, until the state-based Health Insurance Exchanges to be created under the legislation are operational in 2014. It is still unknownexactly what this provision will mean for California residents who need high-risk coverage, but it appears that there will be a newfederally-operated program parallel to the state’s existing program, as requested by Governor Schwarzenegger in a letter to US DHHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in April. The California program typically has a waiting list for enrollment and has a coverage capof $75,000 per year. According to information on the MRMIB website (MRMIB operates California’s high-risk insurance program), California residents who want to take advantage of the new federal risk pool (set for implementation in July) should not enroll in the state program in the meantime as the federal rules require applicants to have been uninsured for six months prior to their application.

After September 23, 2010 the legislation would:

prohibit insurance companies from rescinding the coverage policies of consumers who become ill (except in case of demonstrated fraud);
ban health insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions;
eliminate lifetime coverage limits and restrict annual coverage limits;
allow young adults to remain under their parents' health plans until age 26 if they are otherwise uninsured;
require plans to provide preventive services without co-pays;
provide eligible seniors a $250 rebate to bridge the "doughnut hole" coverage gap in the Medicare prescription drug benefit; and
require health plans to report the proportion of premium dollars spent on clinical services, quality and similar care-related costs (known as the “medical loss ratio”) and, beginning in 2011, order rebates to consumers if plans drop below the accepted ratio.

Longer-Term Reform Provisions

Provisions that would kick in after the first year include:

Beginning in 2011 states are to establish health insurance exchanges by which individuals and small businesses can purchase health insurance.
Insurance market reforms would be adopted including eliminating denial of coverage for pre-existing conditions for adults (goes into effect in 2014), different premiums for people based on their health status, and annual or lifetime benefit caps for adults;
Beginning in 2014, all states are required to cover under Medicaid all individuals under age 65 with incomes up to 133% of the Federal Poverty Level. Federal matching payments would be provided to states for the cost of newly eligible individuals; the match will range from 100% from 2014 – 2016, to 90% in 2018 and thereafter.
Medicaid payment rate for primary care physicians, including pediatricians, would be increased to 100% of Medicare rates in 2013-14. (It is still unclear whether the rate increase will apply to pediatric specialists.)
Beginning in 2014 all states would be required to cover under Medicaid former foster children up to age 26.
Reauthorization of SCHIP (Healthy Families) would be extended at least through 2019, with federal funding extended to at least 2015, and the federal match will be increased by 23% (raising the Californiamatch to 88%) beginning in 2016.

Impact in California

Immediate implementation of some provisions will have tremendous positive impact on children with special health care needs and their families, such as the elimination of annual and lifetime caps on coverage and the elimination of restrictions due to pre-existing conditions for children. The provisions to permit young adults to age 26 to buy into their parents’ coverage and for adults with pre-existing conditions to purchase coverage in state-federally supported programs offer more options for youth with special needs as they age out of child-focused health programs.

One major provision in the new law will have immediate impact on California’s own health care programs: The legislation requires that states maintain their current SCHIP and Medicaid eligibility and benefit levels until 2019, as of the bill’s enactment on March 23. This would prevent the proposed decrease in financial eligibility in our state’s Healthy Families Program and forestall potential reductions in Medi-Cal eligibility. At this time it appears that the health care reform legislation also will prevent states from eliminating their SCHIP or Medicaid programs altogether. In March Arizona decided to shut down its SCHIP program, effective this June, and froze enrollment in the program, andthe Schwarzenegger Administration has proposed eliminating Healthy Families as one of the “trigger cuts” if additional federal funding is not forthcoming.

In the long term, passage of health care reform will mean that as many as two million low-income Californians would be newly eligible for Medi-Cal and other public coverage programs and another two to three million people could obtain private coverage. The bill also sets much higher reimbursement rates for primary care physicians, including pediatricians, who treat Medi-Cal enrollees, initially paid for entirely through federal funding. SinceMedi-Cal physician payments are so much lower than those for Medicare and most commercial payers, the hope is that if primary care physicians are paid at levels on par with Medicare, more physicians will be willing to treat Medi-Cal beneficiaries.

Immediately after the bill signing on March 23, Republican state senators urged California Attorney General Jerry Brown to join 13 other states and sue the federal government over the health care reform bill, citing the mandate for individual insurance coverage and arguing that Congress cannot force people to buy any product, including health insurance. As of this writing, there are no plans for California to join in the suit. Some California lawmakers also are supporting a state constitutional amendment that would require voter approval of any program -- state or federal -- that requires health care coverage; it is unknown at this point how this proposal would fare.

More details will be forthcoming as US DHHS Secretary Sebelius issues regulations for implementation of the legislation.

Resources on National Health Care Reform

Kaiser Family Foundation:
Center for Children and Families, Georgetown University Health Policy Institute:
California HealthCare Foundation:

LA Soman; 3/31/10; rev. 6/8/10