Mythbusters Barrel of Bricks Scientific Method Notes

Mythbusters Barrel of Bricks Scientific Method Notes

Mythbusters’ Barrel of Bricks Scientific Method Notes

Question

Can a Person Live After Being Hit 3 Times By a Barrel of Bricks?

Research

Adam and Jamie are scientists

Heather - Folklore expert

Frank-Construction Dude

KEVIN-Mason Dude

Hypothesis

If we replicate the experiment of a construction worker being hit 3 times by a barrel of bricks, then the construction worker will live because he didn’t die.

Control Experiment (No Independent Variable)

No Buster (No Crash Test Dummy-No Model Human)

Hypothesis Experiment/Independent/Test Variable

Buster Hit by Bricks - (Crash Test Dummy-Model Human)

Hypothesis Experiment/Dependent/Outcome Variable

That Buster LIVES (Crash Test Dummy-Model Human)

Hypothesis Experiment/Constant Variables

1)Barrel

2)Bricks

3)Rope

4)Buster

5)Pulley

6)Quick Release

7)Scaffold

Qualitative Data

T1-Buster Lives

T2-Buster Lives

T3-Buster Lives

T4-Buster Died

Conclusion

The data does not support the hypothesis because Buster died in 1 out of the 4 trials.

Mythbusters’ Electrocuted on the Third Rail Notes

Question

If you urinate on the 3rd rail of a train will you be electrocuted and DIE!!!!!!!!????????????????????????

Hypothesis

If you urinate on the 3rd rail of a train, then you will be electrocuted and DIE because the electricity will travel from the rail through the liquid urine and to your body.

OR

If you urinate on the 3rd rail of a train, then you will NOT be electrocuted and LIVE because the electricity will NOT travel from the rail through the liquid urine and to your body.

Research

Adam and Jamie-Science Dudes

Rob-Transit Dude

Ohms Law

Heather-Folklorist

Control Experiment (No Independent Variable)

No Buster Urinating

Hypothesis Experiment/Independent/Test Variable

Buster Urinating on 3rd rail

Hypothesis Experiment/Dependent/Outcome Variable

That Buster LIVES OR That Buster DIES

Hypothesis Experiment/Controlled/Constant Variables

(1)Buster (2) Urine (3) Third Rail (4) Battery/Electricity (5) Electricity Meter

Qualitative Data

T1-Buster Lives

T2-Buster Lives

T3-Buster Lives

T4-Buster Died because he was grabbing on to the 3rd rail as he peed from a closer distance

Conclusion

No, the data does not support the hypothesis, because Buster lived every time he urinated on the 3rd rail of a train, except for the ridiculous scenario.(the one time where they had him grab the 3rd rail and pee on it with no shoes, wet bare feet, wet ground and from a closer distance.)