ACP005 – Form 2
ASD-CERT Mandated Body
Qualification Activity Report
for ASD-STAN EN#### products manufactured by Manufacturer
Facility location
Date of the report YYYY-MM-DD
q Initial qualification
q Qualification renewal – Former PQ #####
q Change (ACP008 Form 1 part 2 to attach)
Qualification request
Manufacturer submitted a request to be granted on a continuous production process for the qualification approval for high temperature, electrical connectors manufactured to product standards ASD-Stan EN####, styles –### & -###, classes #, # in accordance to the Technical Specification EN YYYY
Contents
1 Quality assurance 3
1.1 Quality Management Systems accreditations 3
1.2 NADCAP or OEM accreditations 3
2 Qualification tests 4
2.1 QTP 4
2.2 QTR 4
2.3 Substantiation by analogy 4
3 Qualification audit synthesis 5
3.1 Material Certificate of Conformity 5
3.2 Manufacturing process 5
3.3 Laboratory means 5
3.4 Technical data management 5
3.5 Particular remarks 5
4 Comments about the design and/or specification standard 6
5 Recommendation/Reserve 6
6 Conclusion 6
Summary of appendixes (bold lines = mandatory)
q Appendix A – Certification Request ACP003 ACP006 ACP008 Form1
q Appendix B – Confirmation of Mandated Body
q Appendix C – Quality accreditation
q Appendix D – Qualification Test Programme (QTP) if there is deviation to the technical specification
q Appendix E – Qualification Test Report (QTR)
q Appendix F - Flow Chart diagram including list of Key Characteristics
q Appendix G – FAI First Article Inspection Report
q Appendix H - Mandated Body recommendation and or ACP005 Form 1
q Appendix I – Additional-tests results as requested by the MBR
q Appendix J – Qualification Check-list
q Appendix K - Technical data sheet
Qualification team:
Name 1
Name 2
1 Quality assurance
In conformance with EN9133
Identification of all test plans, ,
Company Name / Address / OperationDimensioning
Fluor Penetrant Inspection
Vibration tests
X-ray
…
1.1 Quality Management Systems accreditations
See relevant appendix.
Certificate No. / Standard / Scope / Issued / Expiration dateISO9001:2000 / Quality Management Systems - Requirements
EN9100:2003 / Quality management systems Requirements and Quality systems Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing
ISO9004:P1 / Quality management systems Requirements for Aerospace Quality Management System Certification/ Registrations Programs
ISO/IEC17025 / General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories
1.2 NADCAP or OEM accreditations
See relevant appendix.
Certificate No. / Standard / Scope / Issued / Expiration dateAC7101 / Material testing
AC7102 / Heat treating
AS7108 / Chemical processing
AS7114 / Non destructive testing
2 Qualification tests
2.1 QTP
Qualification Test Programme (Reference and issue date), as per Technical specification EN/prEN###### (Issue date or Edition) was implemented within Manufacturers facility (including test houses if any), Address from starting Date to ending date.
The following tests and counter-tests were made under the witness of the Name and company of the MBR acting as Mandated Body Representative on Date with the same manufacturing batch:
2.2 QTR
The QTR including summary of the test results and detail values of these tests and counter-tests are attached to this report (see relevant appendix).
The verifications made under the witness of the Mandated Body Representative on Date ensure that in accordance with ASD-CERT Quality Manual:
· test results given in the Qualification Test Report are similar to counter-tests results (when the qualification test have been made before witness of the Mandated Body Representative)
· the tested parts have been manufactured and inspected as applicable to production parts. FAI report see relevant appendix.
· the Qualification Test Report (see relevant appendix) contains:
o Test facilities, if relevant, photos and identifications of test facilities
o a list of all the tests carried out in accordance with the Qualification Test Program including issue date of all relevant standards and documents,
o lists of quantitative test results with all relevant failures occurred on test samples during test.
o Description of corrective actions, if any and an agreement of MBR to repeat the tests under the revised conditions approved by the MBR and to report the results
o Manufacturing routing sheet and drawing may be attached to this report (see relevant appendix))
· Key process operations are referenced as frozen with a relevant indication on the manufacturing routing sheet and operating documents and their issue date in the manufacturing routing sheets (see relevant appendix). Router sheets, frozen manufacturing documents and manufacturing drawing(s) were stamped by the Mandated Body Representative.
· The Mandated Body can assume with these tests, counter-tests and verifications that all results are in conformance with the requirements of the relevant technical specification.
Manufacturer has demonstrated and supplied supporting data confirm that continuing compliance is being maintained. (see ACP006 in relevant appendix) (when applicable)
MBR check that there is no manufacturing break as specified in EN9133.
2.3 Substantiation by analogy
For example: MBR approves the qualification by analogy of all bolt lengths of the same diameter. Explanation when necessary. (detailed demonstration of the compliance shall be given in the QTR)
3 Qualification audit synthesis
May be checked and/or written with help of Quality office people
3.1 Material Certificate of Conformity
3.2 Manufacturing process
Location of parts manufacturing including sub-contractors for special processes.
This must be the same where a production of parts will be performed later.
3.3 Laboratory means
The Mandated Body can assume with these tests, counter-tests and verifications that
· all tests were correctly performed.
· tools and test equipment used are in calibration and are used correctly and are relevant to perform test per specification requirements
3.4 Technical data management
3.5 Particular remarks
4 Comments about the design and/or specification standard
For example: ISO8642:1986 has been taken into account instead of ISO8642:2008 because this new issue has many mistakes and the qualification tests started before the publication.
A correction will be requested to ISO TC20/SC4.
5 Recommendation/Reserve
Recommendation of the Mandated Body Representative:
For example for qualifications by analogy, MBR may have some reserves about test result to provide to customer. He can concur or amend the QPL proposed by the producer and give his own final QPL in relevant appendix if necessary.
When specification requirement is not fulfilled it shall be clearly defined in this chapter (for example, if the number of cycles required for such test is not achieved / failed).
6 Conclusion
Manufacturers have demonstrated and supplied supporting data to confirm that continuing compliance with technical specification is being maintained. (for qualification renewal).
The audit and the analysis of the qualification folder documents concur/not concur to the assessment of the Mandated Body (see filled-in ACP005-Form01 in relevant appendix).
Name
(Company - Position)
ASD-CERT Mandated Body Representative
Appendix A – Certification Request ACP003 ACP006 ACP008 Form1
Appendix B – Confirmation of Mandated Body
Appendix C – Quality accreditation
Appendix D – Qualification Test Programme (QTP) if there is deviation to the technical specification
Appendix E – Qualification Test Report (QTR)
Appendix F - Flow Chart diagram including list of Key Characteristics
Appendix G – FAI First Article Inspection Report
Appendix H - Mandated Body recommendation and or ACP005 Form 1
Appendix I – Additional-tests results as requested by the MBR
Appendix J - Qualification Check-list
Appendix K - Technical data sheet
1/7