INTEGRATE AMR

Application for Support from the Visiting Fellow fund.

Please send the completed proforma to Rika Nair

Name of University of Warwick host:
Department:
Name and affiliation of Visiting Fellow:

Please attach an up to date CV separately.

  1. Please describe proposed research activities during the Fellowship period focussing on how these will address the AMR challlenge and why the proposed Fellow is suited to address this challenge. Please consider that the judging panel will be from a variety of departments and disciplines (max 500 words)

Please provide a 1 sentence summary of the link to AMR:
  1. Amount of funding requested (maximum £10,000)
  1. Breakdown of expenditure (provide a full economic costing relevant to the proposal)

Travel:
Accommodation:
Food and Sundries (£35/day):
Research:
Total:
  1. Follow-on funding (please outline how you will build on the outcome of this short project in terms of future grant proposals, including potential funders and schemes)
  1. During their stay, the Visiting Fellow will run the following activity:

Top of Form

Workshop Seminar

Bottom of Form

Declaration

I have read the Bridging the Gaps Funding Call supporting documentation and agree to abide by these conditions.

I understand that if I am awarded funding I will be required to arrange for the Visiting Fellow to participate in AMR activities at the University. I also agree to liaise with the INTEGRATE AMR Project Manager to organise a workshop or seminar for the Visiting Fellow to share expertise with the Warwick AMR community.

Name and signature of University of Warwick host:

Date:

v.2April 2016

Visiting Fellowship Fund Proposal Feedback Form

  1. Applicant (max 200 words)

Please comment on the applicants’ ability to deliver the proposed research activities making reference to:
-Track record
  1. Importance (max 200 words)

Please comment on the ability of the proposed visit to enhance Warwick’s potential to be a centre of excellence for research on AMR, including how the research:
-Contributes to or helps maintain the health of mutidisciplinary collaborations
-Complements other research in the area
How realistic are the opportunities for follow-on funding identified for this visit?
  1. Overall Assessment

Please summarise your view of the proposal
My judgement is that (please bold as appropriate):
1 - This proposal does not meet one or more of the assessment criteria (Reject)
2 - This proposal meets assessment criteria but with clear weaknesses (Re-submit)
3 - This proposal meets assessment criteria but with minor weaknesses (Re-submit)
4 - This proposal fully meets all assessment criteria (Accept)

v.2April 2016