archived as

more of Gravity at

note: because important web-sites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was archived from on January 22, 2002 . This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if the updated original cannot be found at the original author's site.

[Keelynet] Re: Gravity/Inertia Dampening Circuit

  • From:TrevStar22 (view other messages by this author)
  • Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:23:13

Hi Jerry --

You quoted Brian DePalma as saying "Rotational motion has an effect on the inertia of an object. The motion of objects in the plane of a spinning flywheel have their inertia REDUCED."

That relates strongly to the work of Henry Wallace whom you probably are aware patented an anti-gravity field generator based on the concept of how rotating masses affect other masses. Following is a selection from the web on his work:

Wallace Patents and Politics of Science

Henry Wallace was an engineer at General Electric about 25 years ago and developed some incredible inventions relating to the underlying physics of the gravitational field. Few people have heard of him or his work.

US Patent #3626605 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating a Secondary Gravitational Force Field" Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA Dec 14, 1971

US Patent #3626606 -- "Method and Apparatus for Generating a Dynamic Force Field" Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Ardmore PA Dec 14, 1971

US Patent #3823570 -- "Heat Pump" (based on technology similar to the above two inventions) Awarded to Henry Wm Wallace of Freeport NY July 16, 1973

Wallace discovered that a force field similar-or-related to the gravitational field results from the interaction of relatively moving masses. He built machines which demonstrated that this field could be generated by spinning masses of elemental material having an odd number of nucleons -- i.e., a nucleus having a multiple half-integral value of ђ (the quantum of angular momentum). Wallace used Bismuth or Copper material for his rotating bodies and "kinnemassic" field concentrators.

Aside from the immense benefits to Humanity which could result from a better understanding of the physical nature of gravity and other fundamental forces, Wallace's inventions could have enormous practical value in countering gravity or converting gravitational force fields into energy for doing useful work. So why has no one heard of him? One might think that the discoverer of important knowledge such as this would be heralded as a great scientist and nominated for dynamite prizes. Could it be that his invention does not work?

Anyone can get the patents. Study them -- Wallace -- General Electric -- detailed descriptions of operations -- measurements of effects -- drawings and models -- it is authentic. If you're handy, you can even build it yourself. It does work. So what is going on?

One explanation I've heard is that Wallace ran up against the politics of Science as dictated in the late 1960s by the power-block at Princeton, who were primarily interested in promoting the ideas of their main man (Einstein) and the gravitation-is-geometry paradigm. Maybe there is some truth to this story. Nowadays, there seems to be a piss-pot full of theoretical physicists working on abstract geometrical theories and other absurdly difficult mental masturbations, while no one seems to have made any effort to provide a theoretical explanation of the physics of a nuts-and-bolts invention which could have enormous practical value.

Maybe we can blame it on the Princeton folks, but I'm more inclined to believe that our defense industry black project community has confiscated and suppressed knowledge of Wallace's discoveries. All done of course under the most honorable and sacred banner of "national security". Well, it's been 25 years. We ought to be real secure by now. Isn't it way past time for some trickle-down benefits to real people? Wallace's inventions offer the potential of improving the quality of life for everyone. Throughout history, political suppression and hoarding of scientific knowledge has inevitably resulted in a retardation of human advancement.

It continues today. When will we ever learn?

Regards,

Robert Stirniman ()

More About the Wallace Patents -- Anti-Gravity Technology

An article about the Wallace patents appeared in the British magazine "New Scientist" in February 1980. This was written nearly 10 years after Wallace was awarded his patents. Here's a paragraph from the article.

"Although the Wallace patents were initially ignored as cranky, observers believe that his invention is now under serious but secret investigation by the military authorities in the U.S. The military may now regret that the patents have already been granted and so are available for anyone to read."

I know -- it's a tease. And the rest of the article is the same way. It provides barely enough information to jab your psyche a little. And not nearly enough to get you off your comfortable ass. And who knows who the anonymous party of "observers" are who believe that a secret investigation is underway by the military -- or whether these observers even exist at all. Nonetheless, New Scientist has a fairly well-established track record for accurate identification of new science trends and issues. And while the editors of this British journal may be prone to enjoyment of gossip and innuendo, it generally turns out be grounded in truth.

One thing they got right for sure: The patents are available for anyone to read. Get them. Study them. No doubt, Wallace got many things wrong about the physical theory of his invention. But he did discover something very important. It does work. Stay tuned.

Regards,

Robert Stirniman ()

Michael Edelman () writes about the Wallace patents on antigravity technology:

"Oh yes indeed. I built one, turned it on, and the damn thing floated away. Haven't been able to get the next one to work."

That's remarkable, Michael. But this is no joke. Although Wallace wasn't able to do anything immediately dramatic, he did build a device that demonstrated a fundamentally new physical effect. And he measured it and demonstrated it conclusively in multiple ways.

It has long been postulated that a "kinetic" gravitational force exists in conjunction with the well know static gravitational force. For many years, scientists and experimenters have theorized that a"kinetic" gravitational force might exist between relatively moving masses -- analogous to the magnetic force that exists between relatively moving charges. A force between relatively moving masses is predicted by some solutions of GR, and has also been predicted by theorists through numerous analogies between the electromagnetic and gravitational fields. (Both have r-squared law, force required to accelerate mass, force required to accelerate charge, kinetic energy proportional to MV2, and magnetic energy proportional to QV2, etc).

People have tried to measure this force for years without success. The "kinemassic" force is very small and difficult to find. What Wallace did was invent a way to demonstrate it, measure it, and most importantly put it to use. Wallace discovered how to concentrate the flux of the "kinemassic" field by using material having unpaired angular momentum in the nucleus -- analogous to how magnetic flux is more easily generated and concentrated by ferromagnetic material, which has unpaired electron (charge) spin.

Wallace built a machine which causes the axis of spin of the unpaired angular momentum in the nucleus to align itself with the Macroscopic spin of the material -- resulting in a much stronger and measurable kinemassic field. He also clearly documented the existence of the field with multiple methods of measurement. It's quite a piece of work. You can get the patents. But you won't find much else anywhere about it because the military has it tucked away. One of the things you can do with it is use a time varying "kinemassic" field to control/generate a gravitational field and to shield a static gravitational field -- analogous to a use of a time varying magnetic field to generate or control an electric field. One of the embodiments of Wallace's invention uses this effect to create a zero gravity chamber -- possibly similar to the zero gravity chamber that NASA is "rumored" to operate in the Houston area.

Regards,

Robert Stirniman ()

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Angular Momentum

There is an important relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic angular momentum; microscopic and Macroscopic angular momentum; and quantum and classical level angular momentum. A body which is spinning within a larger Macroscopic body which is also spinning will tend to align the axis of its angular momentum with the spin axis of the larger body.

For example, a gyroscope located on the Earth -- unless it is in a frictionless gimbal --will always try to precess due to the rotation of the Earth into alignment with the Earth's polar axis, at which point it will no longer precess due to Earth rotation.

Another example: A cylinder of magnetic material spinning around its longitudinal axis will develop a magnetic field proportional to is angular velocity (Barnett Effect), because the angular momentum of the electrons in the material will attempt to precess and come into alignment with the Macroscopic axis of the spinning cylinder, which also brings into alignment the magnetic moment of the electrons, some of which have unpaired spins (ferromagnetic) resulting in generation of a Macroscopic magnetic field. Similarly, it is know that a static magnetic field itself contains angular momentum. And spinning the source of the static field -- whether a magnet or DC current loop -- will result in a corresponding increase-or-decrease in the field strength.

Another example is the inventions of Henry Wallace which were discovered and patented about 25 years ago when he worked at General Electric. Wallace found that an unusual thing happens when you spin elemental material which has a nucleus containing an odd number of nucleons (i.e., having an "un-paired" value of angular momentum, resulting in a nucleus with a multiple integer of a one-half value of the quantum ђ. The spin of the nucleus will begin to line up with the Macroscopic spin axis and will create a force field related to gravity, which Wallace called the "kinemassic" field. If you haven't heard of Wallace or his unusual discovery, it might be because information about it has been classified.

if on the Internet, Press <BACK> on your browser to return to the previous page (or go to

else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'

1