The International Research Foundation

for English Language Education

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING: SELECTED REFERENCES

(Last updated 15 November 2016)

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J.P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483.

Armend, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 11-37. doi:10.1177/1362168807084492

Au, K.H. (1990). Changes in a teacher’s views of interactive comprehension instruction. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 271-286). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Ball, A.F. (2000). Teachers’ developing philosophies on literacy and their use in urban schools: A Vygotskian perspective on internal activity and teacher change. In C.D. Lee, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 226-255). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Berns, M. (1990). Contexts of competence: Social and cultural consideration in communicative language teaching. New York, NY: Plenum.

Brooks, F., & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania, 77(2), 262-274. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/344508

Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Butler, Y.G. (2205). Comparative perspectives towards communicative activities among elementary school teachers in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 9(4), 423-446. doi: 10.1191/1362168805ir176oa

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. doi:10.1093/applin/1.1.1

Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. A. Soler & M. P. S. Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 41-57). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specification. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5-35.

Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1996). Direct approaches in L2 instruction: A turning point in communicative language teaching? TESOL Quarterly 31, 1, 141-52.

Cheatham, R. M. (2007). A 21st centuray approach to inetgarting culture and communication. In C. M. Cherry (Ed.), Dimension: Proceedings of the Southern Conference on Language Teaching (pp. 79-90). Valdosta, GA: SCOLT Publications.

Choi, S. (2000). Teachers’ beliefs about communicative language teaching and their classroom teaching practices. English Teaching, 55(4), 3-32.

Clément, R. (1980). Ethnicity, contact, and communicative competence in a second language. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 147-154). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

Cormany, S., Maynor, C., & Kalnin, J. (2005). Developing self, developing curriculum, and developing theory: Researchers in residence at Patrick Henry Professional Practice School. In D.J. Tedick (Ed.), Language teacher education: International perspectives on research and practice (pp. 215-255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Associates.

Douglas, D., (1986). Communicative competence and tests of oral proficiency. In C. Stansfield (Ed.), Toward communicative competence testing: Proceedings of the second TOEFL Invitational Conference (pp. 156-174). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Ellis, R. (2015). The importance of focus on form in communicative language teaching. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1-12.

Franzak, J. K. (2002). Developing a teacher identity: The impact of Critical Friends practice on the student teacher. English Education, 34(4), 258-281.

Gallimore, R., Dalton, S., & Tharp, R.G. (1986). Self-regulation and interactive teaching: The effects of teaching conditions on teacher’s cognitive activity. Elementary School Journal, 86(5), 613-631.

Gebhard, M. (2004). Fast capitalism, school reform, and second language literacy. Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 245-265.

Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Brandy, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

Geoghegan, J. (2010). How self-managed learning can integrate cultural awareness into the communicative approach to an institution wide language programme. In F. Dervin & E. Soumela-Salmi (Eds.), New approaches to assessing language and (inter-)cultural competencies in higher education (141-154). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.

Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry, 13, 360-375. doi:10.1080/00201747008601597

Hiramatsu, S. (2005). Contexts and policy reform: A case study of EFL teaching in a high school in Japan. In D.J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp. 113-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Holliday, A. (1994). The house of TESEP and the communicative approach: The special needs of state English language education. English Language Teaching Journal, 48(1), 3-11.

Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93-105. doi:10.1080/07908310208666636

Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

Jang, K. S., Si, K. J., & Yun, J. H. (2011). A study of how national English education policies affect communicative language learning for EFL learners in Korea. Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.

Johnson, K. (1982). Two approaches to the teaching of communication. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Communicative syllabus design and methodology (pp. 121-127). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

Johnson, K. (1982). Communicative syllabus design and methodology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

Johnson, K. (1982). Five principles in a “communicative” exercise type. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Communicative syllabus design and methodology (pp. 163-175). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

Johnson, K.E., Jordan, S.R., & Poehner, M. (2005). The TOEFL trump card: An investigation of test impact in an ESL classroom. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 2(2), 71-94.

Keim, B., Furuya, R., Doye, C., & Carlson, A. (1996). A survey of the attitudes and beliefs about foreign language learning of Japanese university students taking communicative English courses. The Japan Association of College English Instructors Journal, 27, 87-106. Retrieved from http://www.jacet.org/journal/index.html

Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 139-164). London, UK: Croom Helm.

Krasnick, H. (1984). From communicative competence to cultural competence. In J. Handscombe, R. A. Orem, & B. P. Taylor (Eds.), On-TESOL 83: The question of control: Selected papers from the Seventeenth Annual Convention of Teachers of English to Speakers of other Languages (pp. 209-221). Washington, D. C.: TESOL.

Lillis, T. M. (2006). Communicative competence. In Berns, M. (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 666-673). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

Little, J.W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teacher College Record, 91(4), 509-536.

Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243-249. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004363

Markee, N. P. (1986). The importance of sociopolitical factors to communicative course design. The ESP Journal, 5 (1), 3-16.

Markee, N. P. (1986). Toward an appropriate technology model of communicative course design. English for Specific Purposes, 5 (2), 161-172.

McGroarty, M., & Taguchi, N. (2005). Evaluating the communicativeness of EFL textbooks for Japanese secondary schools. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language teaching and learning (pp. 211-224). Boston: Thomson/Heinle.

Mitchell, R., & Lee, J. H.-W. (2003). Sameness and difference in classroom learning cultures: Interpretations of communicative pedagogy in the UK and Korea. Language Teaching Research, 7(1), 35-63. doi:10.1191/1362168803lr11oa

Mochizuki, N., & Ortega, L. (2008). Balancing communication and grammar in beginning level foreign language classrooms: A study of guided planning and relativization. Language Teaching Research, 12(1), 11-37. doi:10.1177/1362168807084492

Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Munby, J. (1984). Communicative syllabus design: Principles and problems. In J. A. S. Read (Ed.), Trends in language syllabus design (pp. 55-67). Singapore: SEAMEO-RELC.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative contexts. New York, NY: Routledge.

Newby, D. (2014). Harmonising the teaching and learning of grammar: A cognitive + communicative approach, Babylonia: A Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 2, 23-29.

Netwon, J., & Kennedy, G. (1996). Effects of communicative tasks on the grammatical relations marked by second language learners. System 24, 3, 309-22.

Nishino, T. (2011). Japanese high school teachers' beliefs and practices regarding communicative language teaching: An exploratory survey. JALT Journal, 33(2), 131-155.

Nolan, J., & Hoover, L. (2004). Teacher supervision and evaluation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work. ELT Journal, 41(2), 136-145.

Pettis, J. (2003). A question of definitions: An investigation through the definitions and practices of communicative and task-based approaches. TESL-EJ, 7(3).

Probyn, M. (2001). Teachers’ voices: Teachers’ reflections on learning and teaching through the medium of English as an additional language in South Africa. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4(4), 249-266.

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Rickheit, G., Strohner, H., & Vorwerg, C. (2008). The concepts of communicative competence. In G. Rickheit & H. Strohner (Eds.), Handbook of communication competence (pp. 15-62). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.

Ruben, B. D. (1976). Assessing communication competency for intercultural adaptation. Group & Organization Management, 1(3), 334-354.

Ruben, B. D., & Kealey, D. (1979). Behavioral assessment of communication competency and the prediction of cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 3(1), 15-48.

Samah, A. A. (1984). The English language (communicational) curriculum for upper secondary schools in Malaysia: Rationale, design and implementation. In J. A. S. Read (Ed.), Trends in language syllabus design (pp. 193-215). Singapore: SEAMEO-RELC.

Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R.C. (1999). Communicative language teaching (CLT): Practical understandings. Modern Language Journal, 83, 494-517.

Savignon, S. J. (1987). Communicative language teaching. Theory into Practice, 26(4), 235-242.

Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 261-278.

Savignon, S. J. (1991). Research on the role of communication in classroom-based foreign language acquisition: On the interpretation, expression, and negotiation of meaning. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 31-45). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

Savignon, S. J. (1997). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice: Texts and contexts in second language learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Humanities Social.

Savignon, S. (1997). What’s what in communicative language teaching. English Teaching Forum 25(4), 16-21.

Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. In S. J. Savignon (Ed.), Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education (pp. 1-27). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Savignon, S. J. (2003). Teaching English as communication: A global perspective. World Englishes, 22(1), 55-66.

Savignon, S. (2005). Communicative language teaching: Strategies and goals. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 635-651). New York, NY: Routledge.

Savignon, S. J. (2007). Beyond communicative language teaching: What's ahead?. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 207-220.

Savignon, S. J., & Berns, M. S. (1984). Initiatives in communicative language teaching: A book of readings. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Savignon, S. J., & Wang, C. (2003). Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Learner attitudes and perceptions. IRAL, 41(3), 223-250.

Schulman, J., & Sato, M. (Eds.) (2006). Mentoring teachers toward excellence: Supporting and developing highly qualified teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Sequeiros, X.R. (2014) Verbal communication. Munich, Germany: LINCOM Publishers.

Shannon, P. (1987). Commercial reading materials, a technological ideology, and the deskilling of teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 87(3), 307-329.

Sharkey, J., & Johnson, K.E. (Eds.) (2003). TESOL Quarterly dialogues: Rethinking issues of language, culture, and power. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.

Spolsky, B. (1989). Communicative competence, language proficiency, and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 138-156. doi:10.1093/applin/10.2.138

Stalker, J. C. (1989). Communicative competence, pragmatic functions, and accommodation. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 182-193. doi:10.1093/applin/10.2.182

Swan, M. (1985). A critical look at the communicative approach (1). ELT Journal, 39(1), 2-12.

Swan, M. (1985). A critical look at the communicative approach (2). ELT Journal, 39(2), 76-87.

Tayjasanant, C., & Barnard, R. (2010). Language teachers' beliefs and practices regarding the appropriateness of communicative methodology: A case study from Thailand. Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(2), 279-311.

Thompson, G. (1996). Some misconceptions about communicative language teaching. ELT Journal 50, 1, 9-15.

Thompson, C., & Millington N. (2012). Task-based learning for communication and grammar use. Language Education in Asia, 3(2), 159-167.

Tsui, A. (2004). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of ESL teachers. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Vivanco, V. (2009). Holistic versus communicative approach in assessing oral production in

English. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa [serial on the Internet], 15(2), 1-13. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/relieve/v15n2/RELIEVEv15n2_4.pdf

Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching English as communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Wiemann, J. M. (1977). Explication and test of a model of communicative competence. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 195-213.

Womack, D. F. (1990). Communication and negotiation. In D. O'Hair and G. L. Kreps (Eds.), Applied communication theory and research (pp.77-101). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wong, C. C. Y., & Barrea-Marlys, M. (2012). The role of grammar in communicative language teaching: An exploration of second language teachers' perceptions and classroom practices. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(1), 61-75.

1

177 Webster St., #220, Monterey, CA 93940 USA

Web: www.tirfonline.org / Email: