QIBA Volumetric CT Technical Committee Proffered Protocol to UPICT (continued)
QIBAv-CTChestV1.4
2010.09.09
X.ImagingProtocol–LungTumorVolumesastheBasisforResponseEvaluationCriteriaInSolidTumors(RECIST)oftheChest
InstructionstoClinicalTrialistswhoareadaptingthisimagingprotocolforinclusionintheirClinicalTrialProtocolareshowninitalics.Allitalictextshouldgenerallyberemovedaspartofpreparingthefinalprotocoltext.
0.ExecutiveSummary
Thisprotocoldescribesimageacquisition,processing,analysis,changemeasurementsandinterpretationforquantitativelyevaluatingtheprogression/regressionofmeasurabletargetlesions,thatis,lungtumorsgreaterthan1cminLongestDiameter(LD)atbaselinethatareselectedforfollowupduringacourseoftreatment.Itisintendedtoprovide“twicethesensitivityofusingsumoflongestdiameters(SLD)asthebasisforRECIST1.1”.
TheprotocolusesthesumofwholetumorvolumesinsteadofSLDsasthebasisforRECIST.Otherwise,mostallofthedefinitionsandrulesdescribedbyRECIST1.1stillapply.Theonlyexceptionsarethatthereneednotbealimitonthenumberofmeasurabletargetlesionsselected,asthelong-termgoalistoquantifythewholetumorburdensufferedbyagivenpatientateachtime-pointduringtreatment.
1.ContextoftheImagingProtocolwithintheClinicalTrial
1.1.UtilitiesandEndpointsoftheImagingProtocol
Thisimageacquisitionandprocessingprotocolisappropriateforquantifyingthevolumesofsolidtumorsofthelung,andlongitudinalchangesinvolumeswithinsubjects.
Followingthisprotocolisexpectedtoprovideintra-ratertest-retestprecisionofmeasurementforwholetumorvolumeofnolessthan18%.Thisvalueshouldbe“twiceassensitiveasRECIST”,basedontheideathatforuniformlyexpandingcubesandsolidspheres,a20%increaseintheRECISTdefineduni-dimensionalLongestDiameterofaMeasurableLesioncorrespondstoanincreaseinvolumeofabout73%,andtodiagnoseProgressiveDiseaseatachangeofaboutonehalfthatvolume,36%,thenoiseneedstobelessthanabout18%.
Thisprotocolisotherwiseagnostictotheclinicalsettingsinwhichthemeasurementsaremadeandthewaythemeasurementswillbeusedtomakedecisionsaboutindividualpatientswithcancerornewtreatmentsforpatientswithcancer.Typicalusesmightincludeassessingresponsetotreatment,establishingthepresenceofcertainprogressioneventsfordeterminingTTP,PFS,etc.,distinguishingbetweenarmsofclinicaltrials,ordeterminingeligibilityofpotentialsubjectsinclinicaltrials.
1.2.TimingofImagingwithintheClinicalTrialCalendar
Thisprotocoldoesnotpresumeaspecifictiming.
Generally,perRECIST1.1,"allbaselineevaluationsshouldbeperformedascloseaspossibletothetreatmentstart".Inclinicaltrials,thereisanexpectationthatfollowupscanswillbeacquiredatregular,protocol-specificintervals.
1.3.ManagementofPre-enrollmentImaging
Toquantifyvolumesandvolumechangeswiththeprecisionclaimedinthisprotocol,thepre-treatmentimageacquisitionandprocessingmustmeetorexceedtheminimumspecificationsdescribedinthisprotocol.Scansthatmeetcriteriacanserveasthe“baseline”scanonwhichchangemeasurementsarebased.
Managementofpre-enrollmentimaging,includingdecisionsaboutwhethertoacceptlowerprecisionortorequireanew,protocol-specificbaselinescan,arelefttoeachspecificclinicaltrialprotocolauthor.
1.4.ManagementofOn-ProtocolImagingPerformedOff-Schedule
Thisprotocoldoesnotpresumeauniversal,orevenaspecificimagingschedule.Itisintendedtomeasuretumorvolumechangebetweentwoarbitrarytimepoints,includingscansthatareacquiredoutsideoftheprotocol-specifiedtime-window(OOWscans).
Managementoftheclinicaltrialcalendar,deviationsfromtheprotocolspecifiedtimewindow,andpotentialimpactsofdeviationsornon-uniformityofintervaltimingonderivedoutcomessuchareTime-To-Progression(TTP)orProgression-Free-Survival(PFS)arelefttoeachclinicaltrialprotocolauthor.
1.5.ManagementofOn-ProtocolImagingPerformedOff-Specification
Deviationfromtheimageresolutionspecificationsdefinedinthisprotocolwilllikelydegradethequalityofmeasurements.
Managementofoff-specificationimaging,includingdecisionsaboutwhethertoacceptlowerprecisionscansortorequirerepeatscans,arelefttotheclinicaltrialprotocolauthor.
1.6.ManagementofUnscheduled,Off-ProtocolImaging
Unscheduledimagingexaminationsthatarenotpartoftheprotocolspecifiedproceduresformeasuringtumorvolumesmaybeusedasindicatorsofprogressiononly.Forexample,inasubjectwithlungcancerwhoisbeingfollowedwithCTscansofthebody,ifanunscheduled,off-protocolMRIscanoftheheadisacquiredinthemiddleofacycletoevaluateanewcomplaintofheadache,thenitmaybereadeitherasconfirmingprogressionorbeingnegativeforprogressiondependingonwhetherornotnewbrainmetastasesarediscovered.
1.7.SubjectSelectionCriteriaRelatedtoImaging
1.7.1.RelativeContraindicationsandMitigations
Thisprotocolinvolvesionizingradiation.RiskandSafetyconsiderations,e.g.,foryoungchildrenorpregnantwomen,arereferencedinsection13.1.Localstandardsforgoodclinicalpractice(cGCP)andtheALARAPrinciple(AsLowAsReasonablyAchievableradiationexposure)shouldbefollowed.
Thisprotocolinvolvestheuseofintravenouscontrast.RiskandSafetyconsiderations,e.g.,forsubjectswithchronicrenalfailure,arereferencedinsection13.2.Localstandardsforgoodclinicalpractice(cGCP)shouldbefollowed.Theuseofcontrastinsection5assumestherearenoknowncontra-indicationsinaparticularsubject.
1.7.2.AbsoluteContraindicationsandAlternatives
Therearefew,ifany,absolutecontra-indicationstotheCTimageacquisitionandprocessingproceduresdescribedinthisprotocol.Localstandardsforgoodclinicalpractice(cGCP)shouldbefollowed.
Magneticresonanceimaging(MRI)maybeusedwhenclinicalindicated(e.g.,toevaluatemetastasestotheliver).However,themeasurementoftumorvolumewithnon-CTbasedimagingtechnologiesisoutsidethescopeofthisprotocol.
2.SiteSelection,QualificationandTraining
2.1.PersonnelQualifications
ThisprotocoldoesnotpresumespecificpersonnelorqualificationsbeyondthosenormallyrequiredfortheperformanceandinterpretationofCTexamswithcontrast. Localrulesandregulationsforthecertificationofpersonnelprovidingpatientcareshouldbefollowed.Responsibilitiesforthequalificationandmaintenanceofcertificationofimageanalystsinclinicaltrialsislefttoeachclinicaltrialsponsor.
2.2.ImagingEquipment
ThisprotocolrequiresaCTscannerwiththefollowingcharacteristics:
- whilemulti-sliceisnotrequired,itwillproducebetterresults.
Acceptable:Singleslice,Target:16detectorsorgreater,Ideal:64orgreater - seesection7forrequiredacquisitioncapabilities
- conformstotheMedicalDeviceDirectiveQualitySystemandtheEssentialRequirementsoftheMedicalDeviceDirective
- designedandtestedforsafetyinaccordancewithIEC601-1,aswellasforElectroMagneticCompatibility(EMC)inaccordancewiththeEuropeanUnion’sEMCDirective,89/336/EEC
- Labelledfortheserequirements,aswellasISO9001andClassIILaserProduct,atappropriatelocationsontheproductandinitsliterature
- CSAcompliant
MeasurementSoftware: Seesection9forrequiredcapabilities
Participatingsitesmayberequiredtoqualifyfor,andconsistentlyperformat,aspecificlevelofcompliance.(SeediscussionofBulls-eyeComplianceLevelsinAppendixC.) DocumentationofAcceptable/Target/IdealLevelsofCompliancewillappearinrelevantsectionsthroughoutthisdocument.
2.3.Infrastructure
Noparticularinfrastructureorphysicalenvironmentisspecified. Itisassumedthatimagingprocedureswillbeperformedinlocationsthatareincompliancewithlocalregulationsforoperatingmedicalimagingfacilities.
2.4.QualityControl
2.4.1.Procedures
See12.1.1forproceduresthesitemustdocument/implement.
2.4.2.BaselineMetricsSubmittedPriortoSubjectAccrual
See12.1.2formetricsubmissionrequirements.
2.4.3.MetricsSubmittedPeriodicallyDuringtheTrial
See12.1.3formetricsubmissionrequirements.
Additionaltask-specificQualityControlisdescribedinsectionsbelow.
2.5.Protocol-specificTraining
NoUPICTprotocol-specifictrainingisspecifiedbeyondfamiliaritywiththerelevantsectionsofthisdocument.
3.SubjectScheduling
3.1.TimingRelativetoIndexInterventionActivity
3.2.TimingRelativetoconfoundingActivities(tominimize“impact”)
Thisprotocoldoesnotpresumeanytimingrelativetootheractivities.
FastingpriortoacontemporaneousFDGPETscanortheadministrationoforalcontrastforabdominalCTarenotexpectedtohaveanyadverseimpactonthislungtumorprotocol.
3.3.SchedulingAncillaryTesting
Thisprotocoldoesnotdependonanyancillarytesting.
4.SubjectPreparation
4.1.PriortoArrival
NopreparationisspecifiedbeyondthelocalstandardofcareforCTwithcontrast.
4.2.UponArrival
4.2.1.Confirmationofsubjectcompliancewithinstructions
NopreparationisspecifiedbeyondthelocalstandardofcareforCTwithcontrast.
4.2.2.AncillaryTesting
NoancillarytestingisspecifiedbeyondthelocalstandardofcareforCTwithcontrast.
4.2.3.PreparationforExam
NoexampreparationisspecifiedbeyondthelocalstandardofcareforCTwithcontrast.
5.Imaging-relatedSubstancePreparationandAdministration
5.1.SubstanceDescriptionandPurpose
Theuseofcontrastisnotanabsoluterequirementforthisprotocol.However,theuseofintravenouscontrastmaterialisoftenmedicallyindicatedforthediagnosisandstagingoflungcancerinmanyclinicalsettings.
Contrastcharacteristicsinfluencetheappearanceandquantificationofthetumors;therefore,agivensubjectmustbescannedwiththesamecontrastagentandadministrationproceduresforeachscan,evenifthatmeansnocontrastisgivenduetoitnotbeinggiveninpreviousexamsofthissubjectinthistrial.
Asubjectshouldbescannedwiththesamebrandofcontrastagentforeachscan(Target).Anotherbrandorswitchofcontrastagenttypemaybeusedifmedicallyindicated,e.g.,aswitchfromionictonon-ioniccontrastmedia(Acceptable).
5.2.DoseCalculationand/orSchedule
Foragivensubject,thesamecontrastdoseshouldbeusedforeachscan(Target).Ifadifferentbrandortypeofcontrastisused,thedosemaybeadjustedtoensurecomparabilityasindicatedandasdocumentedbypeer-reviewedliteratureand/orthecontrastmanufacturers’packageinserts(Acceptable).
Site-specificslidingscalesthathavebeenapprovedbylocalmedicalstaffsandregulatoryauthoritiesshouldbeusedforpatientswithimpairedrenalfunction(e.g.,contrastdoseRreductionbasedoncreatinineclearance).
5.3.Timing,SubjectActivityLevel,andFactorsRelevanttoInitiationofImageDataAcquisition
Foragivensubject,imageacquisitionshouldstartatthesametimeaftercontrastadministrationforeachscan(Target).
Scandelayaftercontrastadministrationisdependentupontheboththedoseandrateofadministration,aswellasthetypeofscannerbeingused.Contrastadministrationshouldbetailoredforboththevasculartreeaswellasoptimizationoflesionconspicuityinthesolidorgans.(Theseguidelinesdonotrefertoperfusionimagingofsingletumors.)Generally,sincetherearemultipleconcentrationsofcontrastaswellasadministrationratesandscanningspeeds,itisdifficulttomandatespecificvalues.Generally,institutionalguidelinesshouldbefollowedsoastooptimizereproducibilityofthescantechnique.
5.4.AdministrationRoute
Intravenous.
5.5.Rate,DelayandRelatedParameters/Apparatus
Contrastmaybeadministeredmanually(Acceptable),preferablyatthesamerateforeachscan(Target),whichismosteasilyachievedbyusingapowerinjector(Ideal).
Ifadifferentbrandortypeofcontrastisused,theratemaybeadjustedtoensurecomparabilityifappropriateandasdocumentedbypeer-reviewedliteratureand/orthecontrastmanufacturers’packageinserts(Acceptable).
5.6.RequiredVisualization/Monitoring,ifany
NoparticularvisualizationormonitoringisspecifiedbeyondthelocalstandardofcareforCTwithcontrast.
5.7.QualityControl
See12.2.
6.IndividualSubjectImaging-relatedQualityControl
See12.3.
7.ImagingProcedure
7.1.RequiredCharacteristicsofResultingData
Thissectiondescribescharacteristicsoftheacquiredimagesthatareimportanttothisprotocol.Characteristicsnotcoveredherearelefttothediscretionoftheparticipatingsite.
Additionaldetailsaboutthemethodforacquiringtheseimagesareprovidedinsection7.2.
7.1.1.DataContent
Theseparametersdescribewhattheacquiredimagesshouldcontain/cover.
Parameter / ComplianceLevel*
AnatomicCoverage / Acceptable / entirelungfields,bilaterally
(lungapicesthroughbases)
Target / entirelungfields,bilaterally
(lungapicesthroughadrenalglands)
FieldofView:PixelSize / Acceptable / completethorax:0.55to1.0mm
Target / rib-to-rib:0.55to0.8mm
*SeeAppendixCforadiscussionofBulls-eyeComplianceLevels
FieldofViewaffectspixelsizeduetothefixedimagematrixsizeusedbymostCTscanners.Ifitisclinicallynecessarytoexpandthefieldofviewtoencompassmoreanatomy,theresultinglargerpixelsareacceptable.
7.1.2.DataStructure
Theseparametersdescribehowthedatashouldbeorganized/sampled.
Parameter / ComplianceLevel*
CollimationWidth / Acceptable / 5to160mm
Target / 10to80mm
Ideal / 20to40mm
SliceInterval / Acceptable / contiguousorupto50%overlap
SliceWidth / Acceptable / <=53.0mm
Target / 1.0to2.5mm
Ideal / <=1.0mm
PixelSize / see7.1.1
IsotropicVoxels / Acceptable / (5:1)slicewidth<=5xpixelsize
Target / (1:1)slicewidth=pixelSize
ScanPlane / Acceptable / sameforeachscanofsubject
Target / 0azimuth
RotationSpeed / Acceptable / manufacturer’sdefault
*SeeAppendixCforadiscussionofComplianceLevel
CollimationWidth(definedasthetotalnominalbeamwidth)isoftennotdirectlyvisibleinthescannerinterface.Widercollimationwidthscanincreasecoverageandshortenacquisition,butcanintroduceconebeamartifactswhichmaydegradeimagequality.
Sliceintervals(a.k.a."reconstructionintervals"thatresultindiscontiguousdataareunacceptableastheymay“truncate”thespatialextentofthetumor,degradetheidentificationoftumorboundaries,confoundtheprecisionofmeasurementfortotaltumorvolumes,etc.
Pitchimpactsdosesincetheareaofoverlapresultsinadditionaldosetothetissueinthatarea.Overlapsofgreaterthan20%haveinsufficientbenefittojustifytheincreasedexposure.
SliceWidthdirectlyaffectsvoxelsizealongthesubjectz-axis.Smallervoxelsarepreferabletoreducepartialvolumeeffectsand(likely)providehigherprecisionduetohigherspatialresolution.
PixelSizedirectlyaffectsvoxelsizealongthesubjectx-axisandy-axis.Smallervoxelsarepreferabletoreducepartialvolumeeffectsand(likely)providehighermeasurementprecision.
IsotropicVoxelsareexpectedtoimprovethereproducibilityoftumorvolumemeasurements,sincetheimpactoftumororientation(whichisdifficulttocontrol)isreducedbymoreisotropicvoxels.
ScanPlanemaydifferforsomesubjectsduetotheneedtopositionforphysicaldeformitiesorexternalhardware,butshouldbeconstantforeachscanofagivensubject.
FasterRotationSpeedreducesthebreathholdrequirementsandreducesthelikelihoodofmotionartifacts.
7.1.3.DataQuality
Theseparametersdescribethequalityoftheimages.
Parameter / ComplianceLevel*
MotionArtifact / Acceptable / minimal(seebelow)
Target / noartifact
NoiseMetric / Acceptable / std.dev.in20cmwaterphantom40HU
Target
Ideal
SpatialResolutionMetric / Acceptable / >=6lp/cm
Target / >=7lp/cm
Ideal / >=8lp/cm
*SeeAppendixCforadiscussionofBulls-eyeComplianceLevels
MotionArtifactsmayproducefalsetargetsanddistortthesizeofexistingtargets.“Minimal”artifactsaresuchthatmotiondoesnotdegradetheabilityofimageanalyststodetecttheboundariesoftargetlesions.
NoiseMetricsquantifythelevelofnoiseintheimagepixelvalues.NoisemetricsarenotdefinedbythisUPICTprotocol.Theyarelefttothelocalstandardofcareforbalancingimagequalitywiththerisksofincreasingradiationexposures.
SpatialResolutionMetricquantifiestheabilitytoresolvespatialdetails.Itisstatedintermsofthenumberofline-pairspercmthatcanberesolvedinascanofresolutionphantom(suchasthesyntheticmodelprovidedbytheAmericanCollegeofRadiologyandotherprofessionalorganizations).Lowerspatialresolutioncanmakeitdifficulttoaccuratelydeterminethebordersoftumors,andasaconsequence,decreasestheprecisionofvolumemeasurements.
Spatialresolutionismostlydeterminedbythescannergeometry(whichisnotusuallyunderusercontrol)andthereconstructionalgorithm(whichisunderusercontrol).
ProceduresformeasuringandoptimizingspatialresolutionarenotspecificallydefinedbythisUPICTprotocol,otherthantonotethathigherresolutiontendstoincreasetheprecisionofmeasurement,andasaconsequence,enhancebothpatientcareandscientificmeritinclinicaltrials.
7.2.ImagingDataAcquisition
7.2.1.SubjectPositioning
Foragivensubject,theymaybeplacedinadifferentpositionifmedicallyunavoidableduetoachangeinclinicalstatus(Acceptable),butotherwisethesamepositioningshouldbeusedforeachscan(Target)andifpossible,thatshouldbeSupine/ArmsUp/FeetFirst(Ideal).
Ifthepreviouspositioningisunknown,thesubjectshouldbepositionedSupine/ArmsUp/FeetFirstifpossible.Thishastheadvantageofpromotingconsistency,andreducingcaseswhereintravenouslines,whichcouldintroduceartifacts,gothroughgantry.
Subjectpositioningshallberecorded,manuallybythestaff(Acceptable)orintheimagedatasetheader(Target).
Consistentpositioningisrequiredtoavoidunnecessaryvarianceinattenuation,changesingravityinducedshape,orchangesinanatomicalshapeduetoposture,contortion,etc.Carefulattentionshouldbepaidtodetailssuchasthepositionoftheirupperextremities,theanterior-to-posteriorcurvatureoftheirspinesasdeterminedbypillowsundertheirbacksorknees,thelateralstraightnessoftheirspines,and,ifprone,thedirectiontheheadisturned.
Factorsthatadverselyinfluencepatientpositioningorlimittheirabilitytocooperate(breathhold,remainingmotionless,etc.)shouldberecordedinthecorrespondingDICOMtagsandcasereportforms,e.g.,agitationinpatientswithdecreasedlevelsofconsciousness,patientswithchronicpainsyndromes,etc.
7.2.2.InstructionstoSubjectDuringAcquisition
BreathHold
Subjectsshouldbeinstructedtoholdasinglebreathatfullinspiration(Target)oratleastnearthehighendinspiration(Acceptable)forthedurationoftheacquisition.
Breathholdingreducesmotionwhichmightdegradetheimage.Fullinspirationinflatesthelungswhichisnecessarytoseparatestructuresandmakelesionsmoreconspicuous.
7.2.3.Timing/Triggers
Foreachsubject,thetime-intervalbetweentheadministrationofintravenouscontrastandthestartoftheimageacquisitionshouldbedeterminedinadvance,andthenmaintainedaspreciselyaspossibleduringallsubsequentexaminations.
Forlungmasses,imageacquisitionshouldbetimedtocoincidewithvisualizationofthethoracicarteries.Forsub-diaphragmaticacquisitions,timingshouldcoincidewithopacificationoftheportal-venousbloodvessels.
Acceptable:useastandardtime;Target:evaluate“manually”.
7.2.4.Model-SpecificParameters
AppendixG.1listsacquisitionparametervaluesforspecificmodels/versionsthatcanbeexpectedtoproducedatameetingtherequirementsofSection7.1.
7.2.5.ArchivalRequirementsforPrimarySourceImagingData
See11.3.
7.3.ImagingDataReconstruction
Theseparametersdescribegeneralcharacteristicsofthereconstruction.
Parameter / ComplianceLevel*
ReconstructionKernelCharacteristics / Acceptable / softtooverenhancing
Target / standardtoenhancing
Ideal / slightlyenhancing
ReconstructionInterval / Acceptable / <=5mm
Target / <=3mm
Ideal / <=1mm
ReconstructionOverlap / Acceptable / contiguous(e.g.,5mmthickslices,spaced5mmapartor1.25mmspaced1.25mmapart)
Target / 20%overlap(e.g.5mmthickslices,spaced4mmapartor1.25mmspaced1mmapart)
*SeeAppendixCforadiscussionofBulls-eyeComplianceLevels
ReconstructionKernelCharacteristicsshouldbethesameforeachscanofagivensubject.Asofterkernelcanreducenoiseattheexpenseofspatialresolution.Anenhancingkernelcanimproveresolvingpowerattheexpenseofincreasednoise.Moderationonbothfrontsisrecommendedwithaslightbiastowardsenhancement.
ReconstructionIntervalshouldbethesameforeachscanofagivensubject.
ReconstructionOverlapshouldbethesameforeachscanofagivensubject.
•Decisionsaboutoverlapshouldconsiderthetechnicalrequirementsoftheclinicaltrial,includingeffectsonmeasurement,throughput,imageanalysistime,andstoragerequirements.
•Reconstructingdatasetswithoverlapwillincreasethenumberofimagesandmayslowdownthroughput,increasereadingtimeandincreasestoragerequirements.
ItshouldbenotedthatformultidetectorrowCT(MDCT)scanners,creatingoverlappingimagedatasetshasNOeffectonradiationexposure;thisistruebecausemultiplereconstructionshavingdifferentkernel,slicethicknessandintervalscanbereconstructedfromthesameacquisition(rawprojectiondata)andthereforenoadditionalradiationexposureisneeded.
Asaconsequence,MDCTscannersaretheTargetscannersforthisUPICTprotocol,andthemorerowsofdetectors,theclosertheacquisitioncomestoIdealspecifications.
7.3.1.Model-SpecificParameters
AppendixG.2listsreconstructionparametervaluesforspecificmodels/versionsthatcanbeexpectedtoproducedatameetingtherequirementsofSection7.1.
7.3.2.ArchivalRequirementsforReconstructedImagingData
See11.4.
7.3.3.QualityControl
See12.4.
8.ImagePost-processing
Nopost-processingshallbeperformedonthereconstructedimagessentforimageanalysis.
Suchprocessing,ifperformed,hasthepotentialtodisrupttheconsistencyoftheresults.
9.ImageAnalysis
Eachlunglesionshallbecharacterizedasdescribedinthissection.
Lesionsofinterestinclude:
a)smallpulmonarynodulessurroundedbyair;
b)smalltomediumpulmonarynodulessurroundedbyairand/orwithadjacentnormalandabnormal(non-neoplastic)anatomicstructures;
c)largepulmonarymassessurroundedbyairand/orwithadjacentnormalandabnormal(non-neoplastic)anatomicstructuresand/orconfluentwithmediastinum,chestwall,anddiaphragm.Thus,thecriteriaforselectinglargemassesastargetlesionsisdependentonthecontrastbetweenneoplasticandnon-neoplastictissue.
Fluid,blood,necroticdebris,andthelikeshouldnotbeincludedinthemeasurementoftumorvolume.ProceduresforsegmentingtissuetypeswithinamassarenotdescribedbythisUPICTprotocolbutshouldbeimplementedwhentechnicallyfeasible.
9.1.InputDatatoBeUsed
Thereconstructedimagesmaybeuseddirectlysincenopost-processingisspecified.
NootherdataisrequiredforthisAnalysisstep.
9.2.MethodstoBeUsed
Eachlesionshallbecharacterizedbydeterminingtheboundaryofthelesion(referredtoassegmentation)andtakingcertainmeasurementsofthesegmentedlesion.
Segmentationmaybeperformedautomaticallybyasoftwarealgorithm,manuallybyahumanobserver,orsemi-automaticallybyanalgorithmworkingwithhumanguidance/intervention.
Measurementsmaybeperformedautomaticallybyasoftwarealgorithm,manuallybyahumanobserverwith“e-calipers”,orsemi-automaticallybyanalgorithmworkingwithhumanguidance/intervention.
Itisexpectedthatautomatedboundarydetectionalgorithmswillplacesegmentationedgeswithgreaterprecision,accuracyandspeedthananoperatorcandrawbyhandwithapointingdevice.ItisalsoexpectedthatautomatedalgorithmsforfindingtheLongestDiameter(LD)andLongestPerpendicular(LP)withineachROIwillhavegreaterspeedandprecisionofmeasurementthananoperatorusingelectroniccalipers.Theperformanceofthealgorithmswill,however,dependonthecharacteristicsofthelesionsmaybechallengedbycomplexlungtumors.
Foreachmethodofsegmentationandmeasurementasitechoosestouse,thebaselineintra-andinter-raterreliabilityforsegmentationandforlinearmeasurementshallbemeasuredusingthemethodsdescribedinsection9.6.
MethodsforadjudicatingdiscordantresultsarenotdescribedinthisUPICTprotocol.Varioussystemsofadjudicationaretobeselectedbyattendingphysiciansandclinicaltrialsponsorsortheirdesignees.
Theintra-raterreliabilityoffullyautomatedtumorsegmentationshallbegreaterthan80%(Acceptable),preferablygreaterthan90%(Target),andcanbegreaterthan95%(Ideal).Operatorassistedsemi-automaticsegmentationshouldproducethesamelevelofintra-andinter-raterreliabilityforthevolumemeasurementsofeachtargetlesion.
9.3.RequiredCharacteristicsofResultingData
Whileallmeasurementmetricsareproxiesfortumorburden,itisstilluncertainwhichmeasurementmetricisoptimalforassessingchangesinhealthstatus.Accordingly,multipleoverlappingmeasurementsarespecifiedhere.Themetadatashallinclude:
Foreachtargetlesion,thelesionvolume,inmm3ormL(volumetricmetric)whichisdefinedasthesumofallthevoxelvolumeswithintheboundariesofadiscretetumormassonallthetomographicslicesonwhichitisvisible.
SumofTargetLesionVolumes:Avaluecomputedbyaddingupallofthetargetlesionvolumes.
longestdiameter(LD),inmm(uni-dimensionalmetric)whichisdefinedasthelongestcontinuous,in-planeline-lengththatcanbeplacedwithinanon-nodaltumormassonatransaxialimage.TheLDshouldcorrespondtothegreatestdistancebetweentwoin-planevoxelsanywhereinthestackofimagesonwhichthemasscanbevisualized.ItisexpectedthattheaxiallevelonwhichtheLDwillbederivedwillvaryfromtime-pointtotime-point.
ShortAxis:Theshortaxisisdefinedasthelongestlinethatisperpendiculartothelongest,in-planelinelength(seenearbydiagram).Incontrasttoextra-nodalmasses,thelengthoftheshort-axisistheRECIST1.1outcomemeasureforlymphnodes.
Diagram:Illustrationshowingthelongaxisandtheshortaxisofalymphnode.
thelongestperpendicular(LP),inmm(bi-dimensionalmetric),thatis,thelongest,in-planelinethatcanbeplacedata90degreeangletotheLDontheoneslicecontainingtheLDforatumor
SumoftheDiameters(SOD):Avaluecomputedbyaddingupallofthelongestdiameters(LDs)ofallofthenon-nodalTargetLesionsandtheShortAxisofeachTargetlymphnode.
Thefollowingdefinitionsapplytotheresultingdata:
Baseline:Themeasurementsbasedonthepre-treatmentscansetacquiredmostcloselytothestartoftreatment.
Nadir:Thelowestvalueforthesumofthelongestdiametersorsumofthevolumesofalltargetlesions.Ineffect,thenadiristhenew"baselineequivalent"valueforassessingprogression.ProgressiveDisease(PD)isdefinedasanincreaseinthesumofthelongestdiametersby20%fromnadir,ifbutonlyif,thenewsumofthediameters(SOD)exceeds5mm.Forvolumes,PDisdefinedasanincreaseofmorethan20%ortwotimestheStandardDeviationofmeasurement,whicheverisgreater.
Non-MeasurableLesions:Neoplasticmassesthat,intheirlongestuninterrupteddiameteratbaseline,aretoosmalltomeasurebecausethegreatestdistancebetweenanytwoin-planepixelsislessthantwotimestheaxialslicethickness.
Non-TargetLesions(NTL):Additionalneoplasticmassesthatmeetthecriteriaoftargetlesionsbutarenotselectedforquantitativeassessment,neoplasticmassesthateitherdonotmeettheminimumsizecriteriaorarenotsuitableforrepeatmeasurement,andanytrulynon-measurablelesions,suchasbonemetastases,leptomeningealmetastases,malignantascites,pleural/pericardialeffusion,inflammatorybreastdisease,lymphangitiscutis/pulmonis,cysticlesions,illdefinedabdominalmasses,etc.Non-targetlesionsmustbefollowedqualitatively.
9.4.Platform-specificInstructions
AppendixG.4listsparametervaluesand/orinstructionsforspecificmodels/versionsthatcanbeexpectedtoproducedatameetingtherequirementsofSection9.3.
9.5.ArchivalandDistributionRequirements
See11.6.
9.6.QualityControl
See12.6.
Forallmeasurements,thecoefficientsofvariationshouldbecharacterized,andthe95%confidenceintervalsurroundingthemshouldbecalculated.SpecificqualityassuranceproceduresforestimatingvariancearenotspecifiedinthisUPICTprotocol.
10.ImageInterpretation
WhileAnalysisisprimarilyaboutcomputation;Interpretationisprimarilyaboutjudgment.Interpretationmaybeperformedatboththelesional/targetlevelandintheaggregateatthesubjectlevel(e.g.,inanoncologystudyeachindexlesionmaybemeasuredinlongestdiameterduringtheanalysisphase,butinthisphaseajudgmentmaybemadeastowhetherthereisanew“non-index”lesion;theaggregationofthemeasuredlesionswithcomparisontopreviousstudiescoupledwiththejudgmentastothepresenceorabsenceofanewlesionwillresultintheRECISTclassificationatthesubjectlevel).
10.1.InputDatatoBeUsed
Describerequiredinputdataandanynecessaryvalidationoradjustmentswhichshouldbeperformedonit.Mayalsospecifydatawhichshouldnotbeuseduntilaftertheclinicaltrialinterpretationisrecorded.
(e.g.particularimageseriesorviews;beforeandafterprocessingversionsofimagestoevaluate/validatetheeffectsofprocessing;analysisresults)
10.2.MethodstoBeUsed
Describehowtheinterpretationshouldbeperformed.(For example, definitionofkeyanatomicalpointsorpathologyboundaries;scoringscalesandcriteriasuchasBIRADS,interpretationschemasuchasRECIST,relatedannotations)
10.3.RequiredCharacteristicsofResultingData
10.4.Platform-specificInstructions
AppendixG.5providesinstructionsforspecificmodels/versionsthatcanbeexpectedtoproducedatameetingtherequirementsofSection10.3.
10.5.ReaderTraining
10.6.ArchivalRequirements
See11.7.
10.7.QualityControl
See12.7.
11.ArchivalandDistributionofData
Describetherequireddataformats,transmissionmethods,acceptablemedia,retentionperiods,…
(e.g.Isthesiterequiredtokeeplocalcopiesinadditiontotransmittingtothetrialrepository?Mustallintermediatedatabearchived,orjustfinalresults?Atwhatpointmayvariousdatabediscarded?)
11.1.CentralManagementofImagingData
Ideal:electronictransmissionofencrypteddataoverasecurenetwork
Target:electronictransmissionwithasecurefiletransferprotocol
Acceptable:couriershipmentofphysicalmediacontainingelectroniccopiesofthedata
Note:Thesubmissionoffilmsfordigitizationisrarelyacceptable.Whendigitizedfilmsaresubmitted,theymustcontainarulerorquantificationwillnotbepossible.
Imagingdataforanalysisatcentrallaboratoriesshouldbede-identifiedaccordingto
11.2.De-identification/AnonymizationSchema(s)toBeUsed
Thede-identificationsoftwareshouldbecertifiedasfit-for-purposebyregulatoryauthoritiesatboththesiteoforiginandsiteofreceipt.
Allpersonalpatientinformationthatisnotneededforachievingthespecificaimsofthetrialshouldberemoved.
Pre-specifieddata,suchasheight,weight,andinsomecases,sex,race,orage,mayberetainedifitisessentialforachievingthespecificaimsofthestudyandassuchhasbeenapprovedforusebyregulatoryauthorities.Qualityassuranceproceduresmustbeperformedbytherecipienttoverifythattheimagesthatwillbesubmittedforanalysishavebeenproperlyde-identified.
Acceptable:Datashouldbetransferredtoa"quarantinearea"ofa"safeharbor"forcleaningandcertificationofde-identificationbyprofessionalresearchorganizationsortrainedoperatorsusingproceduresthathavebeencertifiedbyregulatoryauthoritiesatthesiteofreceipt.Qualityassuranceproceduresperformedbytherecipientshouldverifythattheimagesthatwillbesubmittedforanalysishavebeenproperlyde-identified.Imagesthatwerenotproperlyde-identifiedpriortoreceiptbythecentralarchivingfacilityshouldbeobliteratedafterassuringthatcopiesconformtoqualitystandardsforpatientprivacy.
11.3.PrimarySourceImagingData
Thisprotocolpresumesnoarchivingthepre-reconstructionimagedata.
11.4.ReconstructedImagingData
Reconstructedimagesshallbearchivedlocally,formattedaseitherDICOMCTimageobjectsorDICOMEnhancedCTimageobjects.
RetentionperiodandpolicyislefttotheClinicalTrialProtocolauthor.
11.5.Post-ProcessedData
Nopostprocessingisspecified,howeverifpost-processingisperformed,theimagesshallbearchivedthesameas11.4.
11.6.AnalysisResults
SegmentationresultsmayberecordedasDICOMSegmentationObjects,orSTLModelFiles.
Measurementresultsmayberecordedas…
Thedatadescribedin9.3maybeprovidedinanyofthefollowingformats:
•DICOMSR
•DICOMRTSS
•DICOMsecondarycapture
•XLS,CSV,XML
11.7.InterpretationResults
12.QualityControl
12.1.QCAssociatedwiththeSite
12.1.1.QualityControlProcedures
DescriberequiredproceduresanddocumentationforroutineandperiodicQCforthesiteandvariouspiecesofequipment.
12.1.2.BaselineMetricsSubmittedPriortoSubjectAccrual
Listrequiredbaselinemetricsandsubmissiondetails.
12.1.3.MetricsSubmittedPeriodicallyDuringtheTrial
Listrequiredperiodicmetricsandsubmissiondetails.
12.2.QCAssociatedwithImaging-relatedSubstancePreparationandAdministration
12.3.QCAssociatedwithIndividualSubjectImaging
AcquisitionSystemCalibration
Ideal:AprotocolspecificcalibrationandQAprogramshallbedesignedconsistentwiththegoalsoftheclinicaltrial.
Thisprogramshallinclude(a)elementstoverifythatsitesareperformingthespecifiedprotocolcorrectly,and(b)elementstoverifythatsites’CTscanner(s)is(are)performingwithinspecifiedcalibrationvalues.Thesemayinvolveadditionalphantomtestingthataddressissuesrelatingtobothradiationdoseandimagequality(whichmayincludeissuesrelatingtowatercalibration,uniformity,noise,spatialresolution-intheaxialplane-,reconstructedslicethicknessz-axisresolution,contrastscale,CTnumbercalibrationandothers).ThisphantomtestingmaybedoneinadditionaltotheQAprogramdefinedbythedevicemanufacturerasitevaluatesperformancethatisspecifictothegoalsoftheclinicaltrial.
Target:AprotocolspecificcalibrationandQAprogramshallbedesignedconsistentwiththegoalsoftheclinicaltrial.
Thisprogrammayinclude(a)elementstoverifythatsitesareperformingthespecifiedprotocolcorrectly,and(b)elementstoverifythatsites’CTscanner(s)is(are)performingwithinspecifiedcalibrationvalues.Thesemayinvolveadditionalphantomtestingthataddressalimitedsetofissuesprimarilyrelatingdoseandimagequality(suchaswatercalibrationanduniformity).ThisphantomtestingmaybedoneinadditionaltotheQAprogramdefinedbythedevicemanufacturerasitevaluatesperformancethatisspecifictothegoalsoftheclinicaltrial.
Acceptable:SitestaffshallconformtotheQAprogramdefinedbythedevicemanufacturer.
12.3.1.PhantomImagingand/orCalibration
[Documenttheprocedureforacquiringimagesandmeasuringtheimagequalitymetricsintheacquisitionprotocoldescription,e.g.uniformity,noise,effectiveresolution]
12.3.2.QualityControloftheSubjectImageandImageData
12.4.QCAssociatedwithImageReconstruction
12.5.QCAssociatedwithImageProcessing
12.6.QCAssociatedwithImageAnalysis
12.7.QCAssociatedwithInterpretation
13.Imaging-associatedRisksandRiskManagement
13.1.RadiationDoseandSafetyConsiderations
ItisrecognizedthatX-rayCTusesionizingradiationandthisposessomesmall,butnon-zerorisktothepatientsinanyclinicaltrial.Theradiationdosetothesubjectsinanytrialshouldconsidertheageanddiseasestatus(e.g.knowndiseaseorscreeningpopulations)ofthesesubjectsaswellasthegoalsoftheclinicaltrial.Theseshouldinformthetradeoffsbetweendesiredimagequalityandradiationdosenecessarytoachievethegoalsoftheclinicaltrial.
13.2.ImagingAgentDoseandSafetyConsiderations
13.3.ImagingHardware-specificSafetyConsiderations
13.4.ManagementandReportingofAdverseEventsAssociatedwithImagingAgentandEnhancerAdministration
13.5.ManagementandReportingofAdverseEventsAssociatedwithImageDataAcquisition
AppendixA:AcknowledgementsandAttributions
ThisimagingprotocolisprofferedbytheRadiologicalSocietyofNorthAmerica(RSNA)QuantitativeImagingBiomarkerAlliance(QIBA)VolumetricComputedTomography(v-CT)TechnicalCommittee.
Thev-CTtechnicalcommitteeiscomposedofscientistsrepresentingtheimagingdevicemanufacturers,imageanalysissoftwaredevelopers,imageanalysislaboratories,biopharmaceuticalindustry,academia,governmentresearchorganizations,professionalsocieties,andregulatoryagencies,amongothers.Allworkisclassifiedaspre-competitive.Amoredetaileddescriptionofthev-CTgroupanditsworkcanbefoundatthefollowingweblink:
TheVolumetricCTTechnicalCommittee(inalphabeticalorder):
• Avila,R Kitware,Inc.
• Buckler,A (Chair)BucklerBiomedicalLLC
• Dorfman,G (UPICTliaison)Cornell
• Fenimore,C (WG1Cleader)NatInstStandardsTechnology
• Ford,R RadPharm,Inc.
• Gottlieb,R RoswellParkCancerCenter
• Hayes,W BristolMyersSquibb
• Hillman,B Metrix,Inc.
• McNitt-Gray,MUniversityCaliforniaLosAngeles
• Mozley,PD (pharmaindustryco-chair)MerckCoInc/PhRMA
• Mulshine,JL Rush
• Nicholson,D Definiens,Inc.
• O'Donnell,K (IHEliaison)Toshiba
• Petrick,N (WG1Aleader)USFoodandDrugAdministration
• Schwartz,LH (academicco-chair)
• Sullivan,DC (RSNAExecutiveSponsor)DukeUniversity
• Zhao,B., MemorialSloanKetteringCancerCenter
Thev-CTCommitteeisdeeplygratefulfortheremarkablesupportandtechnicalassistanceprovidedbythestaffoftheRadiologicalSocietyofNorthAmerica,includingSusanAnderson,LindaBresolin,JosephKoudelik,andFionaMiller.
AppendixB:BackgroundInformation
Thelong-termgoalofthev-CTcommitteeistoqualifythequantificationofanatomicalstructureswithx-raycomputedtomography(CT)asbiomarkers.Thev-CTgroupselectedsolidtumorsofthechestinpatientswithlungcancerasitsfirstcase-in-point.Therationaleforselectinglungcancerasaprototypeisthatthesystemsengineeringanalysis,thegroundwork,profileclaimsdocuments,androadmapsforbiomarkerqualificationinthisspecificsettingcanserveasageneralparadigmforeventuallyquantifyingvolumesinotherstructuresandotherdiseases.
Thespecificaimofthisimageacquisitionandprocessingprotocolistodescribeproceduresthatseemsufficientforquantifyingthevolumesofneoplasticmassesinthechestthathaverelativelysimplegeometricshapesandareadequatelydemarcatedfromsurroundingnon-neoplastictissues.Thisparticularimageacquisitionandprocessingprotocolislimitedtomassesthathavemeasurablediametersof10mmormore.Theprofileclaimsdocumentonwhichthisprotocolisbasedassertsthatfollowingtheseimageacquisitionandprocessingprocedureswillproducevolumemeasureswithlessthan18%test-retestvariability.
Theprotocoldescribes,inpredominantlychronologicalorder,proceduresthatarerequiredtoachievethislevelofprecision.
Theprotocoldescribesproceduresthatshouldbeuniversallyfollowedinthissetting,regardlessoftheinstrumentthatisusedtoacquirethedata.Italsoprovideslinkstotablesthatlistspecificsettingsonvariousmakes-and-modelsofCTscanners.
Thisprotocolshouldbeconsideredforuseinthecareofindividualpatientsinconventionalmedicalsettings,aswellasinclinicaltrialsofnewtherapiesforlungcancer.Table1summarizeshowstagingrelatestolungcancerdrugtherapyapproaches,theimagingapproachesusedinthosestagesandissuesrelativetotheimagerequirements.
Table1:SummaryofImageProcessingIssuesRelativetoStageofLungCancer
Stage / %ofCases / 5-yearSurvival% / ImagingFocus/TherapyFocus / ImagingTool / Issues / ThoracicSegment. / Hi-ResI / 16% / 49% / Primarytumor/NeoandadjuvantRX / sCT / Smallcancerssurroundedbyair / Canbestraightforward / Need
II/III / 35% / 15.2% / Primary,hilarandmediastinallymphnodes/Combinedmodality / sCT,PET / Largertumorsandnodesabutotherstructures / Oftenchallenging / Opt.
IV / 41% / 3% / Primary/regionalnodesandmetastaticsites/Chemotherapy / sCT,PET,Bone,BrainScan / Tumorresponseoftendeterminedoutsidethechest / Oftenchallenging / Opt.
AppendixC:ConventionsandDefinitions
Bulls-eyeComplianceLevels
Acquisitionparametervaluesandsomeotherrequirementsinthisprotocolarespecifiedusinga“bullseye”approach.Threeringsareconsideredfromwidesttonarrowestwiththefollowingsemantics:
ACCEPTABLE:failingtomeetthisspecificationwillresultindatathatislikelyunacceptablefortheintendeduseofthisprotocol.
TARGET:meetingthisspecificationisconsideredtobeachievablewithreasonableeffortandequipmentandisexpectedtoprovidebetterresultsthanmeetingtheACCEPTABLEspecification.
IDEAL:meetingthisspecificationmayrequireunusualeffortorequipment,butisexpectedtoprovidebetterresultsthanmeetingtheTARGET.
AnACCEPTABLEvaluewillalwaysbeprovidedforaspecifiedparameter.Whenthereisnoreasontoexpectbetterresults(e.g.intermsofhigherimagequality,greaterconsistency,lowerdose,etc.),TARGETandIDEALvaluesarenotprovided.
Someprotocolsmayneedsitesthatperformathighercompliancelevelsdosoconsistently,sositesmayberequestedtodeclaretheir“levelofcompliance”.IfasitedeclarestheywilloperateattheTARGETlevel,theymustachievetheTARGETspecificationwheneveritisprovidedandtheACCEPTABLEspecificationwhenaTARGETspecificationisnotprovided.Similarly,iftheydeclareIDEAL,theymustachievetheIDEALspecificationwheneveritisprovided,theTARGETspecification
Acquisitionvs.Analysisvs.Interpretation
Thisdocumentorganizesacquisition,reconstruction,post-processing,analysisandinterpretationasstepsinapipelinethattransformsdatatoinformationtoknowledge.
Acquisition,reconstructionandpost-processingareconsideredtoaddressthecollectionandstructuringofnewdatafromthesubject.Analysisisprimarilyconsideredtobecomputationalstepsthattransformthedataintoinformation,extractingimportantvalues.Interpretationisprimarilyconsideredtobejudgmentthattransformstheinformationintoknowledge.
(Thetransformationofknowledgeintowisdomisbeyondthescopeofthisdocument.)
OtherDefinitions
Anonymization / Anonymizationistheprocessofde-identificationandfurtherremovaloramiguationofinformationtoreducetheprobabilityofre-identificationoftheimagedespiteaccesstootherinformationsourcesAdjudicationorAdjudicationRead / Adjudicationistheprocessesofdecisionmakingthatinvolvesanindependentpartywiththeauthoritytodetermineabindingresolutionthroughaprespecifiedprocess.Inthestandardreaddesignonceaprimaryanalysisofalltimepointdataforeachpatienthasbeencompleted,thefindingsarecomparedinordertoidentifyanydiscrepanciesinoverallassessmentsofBestOverallResponse,DateofProgression,DateofResponseandDateofResponseConfirmation.Soastoascertainthefinaldeterminationfordiscrepantcases,athirdReviewerwillreviewthepatientdataandchoosetoagreewiththefindingsofoneofthetwoprioranalyses.ThethirdReviewerevaluatesthesamesetofimagesusedbyReviewers1and2andwillnothaveseentheimagesbefore.
AvariationofthisreaddesignistohaveathirdReviewerwhoisblindedtothepreviousfindingsandreviewsthecasesinexactlythesamefashionastheinitialReviewers.Ifagreementisnotreachedinthreeseparateanalyses,aconsensusofReviewersisrequiredinordertoverifythefinaldeterminationforthatpatient.ReaddesignswillbeoutlinedindetailintheIndependentReviewCharterinadvanceofeCRFdesign,or
Adjudicationisameansofdecidinganoutcomewheretwodifferentopinionsareformed,or
Generallyreferringtoablindedindependentreaddesignedtoresolvediscrepanciesbetweentwoprimaryreaders.
AdjudicationRate / TheAdjudicationRateisthenumberofcasesthatareadjudicateddividedbythetotalnumberofcasesevaluated.
BaselineFollowedbyRandomizedTemporalImagePresentation / BaselineFollowedbyRandomizedTemporalImagePresentationisthesequenceofimagepresentationsuchthatthebaseline(earliest)timepointisshowntothereviewerforthepurposeofidentifyingregionsofinterest,suchasselectingneoplasticmassesastargetlesions.Subsequenttimepointsarepresentedinarandomorderwithrespecttothedate.
Blinding / Blindingisaprocedureinwhichoneormorepartiestothetrialarekeptunawareofthetreatmentassignmentsandotherinformationthatmightintroducebias.Singleblindingusuallyreferstothesubjectsbeingunaware,anddouble-blindingusuallyreferstothesubjects,investigators,monitor,and,insomecases,dataanalystsbeingunawareofthetreatmentassignments,or
Blindingistheoutcomeofallprocessesandproceduresthataredeployedtopreventimageanalysisoperatorsorreviewersfrombecomingawareoforinformedaboutthecircumstancessurroundingacase,suchastheinformationinthefollowingabbreviatedlist
investigational(testdiagnosticortesttherapeutic)arm(oranydatathatmightrevealtheinvestigationalarm)
subjectdemographics
siteassessments(includingsitechoiceoflesions)
situationalspecificdescriptionsofthescans(suchas“confirmation”or“endoftreatmentscans”)
resultsorassessmentsofotherreviewersparticipatinginthereadingprocess(exceptduringsomeadjudicationscenarios)
clinicaldataotherthanthatwhichhasbeenpre-specifieddescribedintheimagingcharter.
BlindedRead / ABlindedReadistheanalysisofimagestodetermineresultsofthetestinginwhichtheradiologistisunawareofanysubjectorsiteinformation.
Burned-inInformation / Burned-inInformationisinformationthatispartoftheactualpixeldataasopposedtopresentintheimageheader.
Comment / Acommentinthisinstanceisgenerallyreferringtoatextfieldthatcancaptureadditionalreaderinsightintothereadprocessorreaderthoughtprocesses.CommentsaregenerallyrequiredwhenthereaderindicatesanimageinNotEvaluableortheiropiniondiffersfromthederivedresponse.
ClinicalReadorSiteread / Generallyreferringtoanindependentreadthatcombinestheresultoftheimagingreviewwithpre-definedclinicalinformationtocometoafinaloutcomeassociatedwiththeefficacyendpoint.Readersaregenerallyblindtotreatmentgroupsbutmaybeprovidedavarietyofclinicalinformationappropriatetothediseaseassessment.Or
Imageinterpretationdoneattheinvestigationalsite
ComputerGeneratedQuantitativeImageAnalysis / ComputerGeneratedQuantitativeImageAnalysisisananalysisperformedautomaticallybyacomputerwithlittleornohumaninteractionusingsignalprocessingalgorithmstoquantifyanimagingoutcomemeasure.Thistypeofanalysisshouldbedeterministic(alwaysproduceidenticaloutputfromthesameinput)orhavelowvariability.
ClinicalData
ConfirmationRead / AConfirmationReadisgenerallyreferringtoacentralreadthatoccursbasedonan“on-site”event.Confirmationreadsareassociatedwitheligibilitycriteria,diseaseprogressionorothereventsthatmaybenefitfromathirdpartyconfirmation.
DataLock / TheDataLockisthepointandmethodwhentheresultsofanassessmentorimagingoutcomevariableareconsideredfinalandareprotected.Thismustbepre-definedintheanalysis.Lockingmustnotbeconstruedtomeananassessmentcannotbeoverturnedasindicatedbyemergingdataaslongas:(1)theprocessispre-definedintheImagingCharter;(2)theprocessisdrivenbydatathat,bydesign,emergesaftertheinitialassessment;and(3)thereareadequateaudittrailsthatcansubstantiatethechanges.
De-identification / De-identificationistheprocessofremovingrealpatientidentifiersortheremovalofallsubjectdemographicsfromimagingdataforanonymization
De-personalization / De-personalizationistheprocessofcompletelyremovinganysubject-relatedinformationfromanimage,includingclinicaltrialidentifiers.
DerivedResponse / ADerivedResponseisanoutcomemeasurealgorithmicallyderivedbasedoninformationfromtheblindedreaderassessments.
EndofReviewDataLock / IntheEndofReviewDataLock,thedataarelockedwhenthereviewsofallthetimepointsforthesubjecthavebeencompleted.
Evaluable / Generallyreferringtoimagequality.Basedonpresenceorabsenceofnecessaryimagingandtheassociateimagequality.Evaluableistheresponsegeneratedwhenanimageand/ortimepointcanbeinterpreted.
ExamLevelDataLock / IntheExamLevelDataLock,thedataare"locked"in"finalform"aftereachExam(medicalimagingprocedure)isassessed.ThepurposeoftheExamLockistoassessthedifferentialcontributionofeachExamtotheoverallassessment.
HumanInterfacedImageAnalysis / HumanInterfacedImageAnalysisisimageanalysisthatisdrivenprimarilybyahumanreviewerwhomayusecomputergeneratedanalysistoolstoquantifyanimagingoutcomemeasure.
HybridRandomizedImagePresentation / HybridRandomizedImagePresentation.Inthisparadigm,thefirststageoftheassessmentisfullyrandomizedorthepost-baselinescansarerandomized.Oncetheresultshavebeenlockedforeachtimepoint,theimagesarere-presentedinknownchronologicalorderforreconsideration.Changesinanyoftherandomizedassessmentsaretrackedandhighlightedinthefinalassessment.
Inwithin-patient-controltrials(e.g.comparativeimaging)imagesobtainedbeforeandafterthetestagentshouldbepresentedinrandomizedun-pairedfashion.Theminimumsizeoftherandomizationblocknecessarytominimizerecallshouldbeconsidered.
ImageAnalysis,ImageReview,and/orRead / Proceduresandprocessesthatculminateinthegenerationofimagingoutcomemeasures,suchasbrainvolume,cardiacoutput,ortumorresponsecriteria.Reviewscanbeperformedforeligibility,safetyorefficacy.Thereviewparadigmmaybecontextspecificanddependentonthespecificaimsofatrial,theimagingtechnologiesinplay,andthestageofdrugdevelopment,amongotherparameters.
ImagingData / ImagingDataarevariablesderivedfromtheimagereviewor,ImagingDataarequantitativeorqualitativevariablesresultingfromimagereview.Suchvariablesmaybeusedtoassesseligibilityforstudyandtreatmentresponse,or
ImagingDataisinformationthatresultsfromorisproducedbytheimageanalysisorreviewprocesses(suchaslesionselectionandtheirassociatedspatialmeasurements),orfromalgorithmicallyderivedassessmentsspecifiedintheprotocol.Inthiscontext,thetermalsorefersto"marks"placedonimages,suchasregionsofinterestboundaries,annotationssuchas"TargetLesion4",etc.
ImagingEndpoint / Endpointbasedonobjectiveimagefeatureschosentoevaluatetheactivityofastudytreatment(e.g.retardationofjointdestructioninpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis)
ImagingExaminationorImagingExamorExam / AnExaminationorExamisasinglesetofintimatelyrelatedimagesacquiredcontemporaneouslywithasingletechnology,suchasaCTscanofthechest,awholebodybonescintigram,oranechocardiogram.
ImageHeader / TheImageHeaderisthatpartofthefileordatasetcontainingtheimageotherthanthepixeldataitself
ImagingCaseReportForms: / ImagingCaseReportFormsareIRC-specificformsdesignedtocaptureelementsofimageacquisition,and/orimageinterpretationand/orderivedresponsesforenrollmentand/oreligibilityreviewand/orconfirmationreadsand/orefficacyassessment.
ImagingPhantoms / Devicesusedforperiodictestingandstandardizationofimageacquisition.Thistestingmustbesitespecificandequipmentspecificandconductedpriortothebeginningofatrial(baseline),periodicallyduringthetrialandattheendofthetrial.,
ImageReviewPlanor
RadiologyTechnicalManual / TheImageReviewPlanorRadiologyTechnicalManualisathatdocumentthatsummarizestheplanfortheacquisitionofimagingdata.
ImagingSurrogateEndpoint / Imagingendpointthatiscorrelatedwithaclinicaloutcomebutisnotsufficienttoshowclinicalbenefit
IndependentReview / UsedefinitionsinGFIDevelopingMedImagingDrugPart32004
IndependentReviewCharter(IRC): / TheImageReviewCharterisadocumentsubmittedtoaregulatoryagencytodocumentandsupporttheuseofimagingtosupportanIND,NDAorBLA.Thedocumentidentifiesandlistsimagingresources,imagingsurrogatecriteria,processesforreceipt,handling,preparationandarchiveofimages,theprocessstepsforreviewandassessmentofimagesandthevariousmethodologiesforqualityassuranceandqualitycontrol,or
TheImageReviewCharterisadetailedtechnicaldocumentgoverningtheacquisition,processing,display,interpretation,transfer,andintegrityofimagingdatainefficacytrialsthatuseimagingforassessmentofefficacyoutcomes.IRCsareanintegralcomponentoftheclinicaltrialprotocolandpromotequalityandverifiabilityofimagingdata.TheIRCisdesignedforusebytheclinicalinvestigators,bythecentralimagelaboratoryandbyregulatoryagencies.
TheIRCmightbesubmittedtoaregulatoryagencyforreviewandcommentandtoreachagreementontheuseofimagingintrialsintendedtosupportanNDAorBLA.TheIRCcontainsasummaryoftheclinicalprotocolincludingstudydesign,studypopulation,efficacyendpointsandprimaryefficacyanalysis.TheIRCdescribesimagingresources,processesforreceipt,handling,preparationandarchiveofimages,processstepsforreviewandassessmentofimagesandvariousmethodologiesforqualityassuranceandqualitycontrol.TheIRCneedstocrossreferencerelevantportionsoftheclinicalprotocolincludingenrollmentcriteria,outcomemeasures,andstatisticalanalysisplan(includingprimaryefficacyanalysis,proceduresforhandlingmissingoruninterpretabledataetc.)ForeaseofregulatoryreviewtheIRCshouldincludeaprotocolsynopsisthatissufficientlydetailedtopermitverificationofconsistencyoftheIRCwiththeclinicalprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan.
IndividuallyIdentifiableInformation / IndividuallyIdentifiableInformationisdatathataloneorincombinationmaybeusedtoidentifyanindividual.
Interpretable / Generallyreferringtoimagequalityassessedbytheblindedreader.Basedonpresenceorabsenceofnecessaryimagingandtheassociateimagequality.Groundsfortheassessmentarecommonlycaptured.Forexample,notOptimalbutEvaluableistheresponsegeneratedwhenanimageand/ortimepointisofquestionablequalitybutcanbeinterpreted.
Intra-ObserverVariabilityorIntra-ReaderVariability / Intra-ObserverVariabilityorIntra-ReaderVariabilityisthevariabilityintheinterpretationofasetofimagesbythesamereaderafteranadequateperiodoftimeinsertedtoreducerecallbias.
Inter-ObserverVariabilityorInter-ReaderVariability / Inter-ObserverVariabilityorInter-ReaderVariabilityisthevariabilityintheinterpretationofasetofimagesbythedifferentreaders.
NotEvaluable / Generallyreferringtoimagequality. Basedonpresenceorabsenceofnecessaryimagingandtheassociateimagequality.NotEvaluableistheresponsegeneratedwhenanimageand/ortimepointcannotbeinterpreted.Maybeassessedinrealtimebyablindedthirdpartyqualityassessorindependentlyofimagereader.Provisionforreimaging(wherefeasible)shouldbeprespecified.ListingofcriteriaisprovidedandresponsesarecapturedintheCRF.
“N”TimePointDataLock / Inthe“N”TimePointDataLock,avariablenumberoftimepoints“N”canbecombinedandshowntogetherataparticularstageofthereviewprocess.Forexample,thebaseline/screeningandthefirstsubsequenttimepointafterbaseline/screeningmaybereviewedtogethertoestablishthebaselineextentofdisease.
Off-ProtocolImaging / Off-ProtocolimagingisimagingthatmayhavebeenperformedduringatrialandshouldnotbereviewedbytheIRCor
Imagingwhichisdoneduringatrialbutnotrequiredbytheprotocol.
On-ProtocolImaging / On-Protocolimagingisimagingthatisperformedduringatrialasrequiredbyanddefinedintheprotocol,or
On-ProtocolimagingisimagingthatisperformedduringatrialasrequiredbyanddefinedintheprotocolthatshouldbereviewedbytheIRC.
OrderofImagePresentation / TheOrderofImagePresentationisthesequencethatimagesarepresentedtoreviewersforformalreviewandgenerationoftheimagingoutcomemeasures.Sufficientlywellestablisheddesignsinclude:
Personalinformation / Personalinformationisdatarelatedtopersonidentification-seeEUguidance(e.g.,Age)
PrimaryReadorPrimaryReview / APrimaryReadistheblindedreviewofimagingdatainwhichoneormoreindependentreviewersreviewimagestogeneratetheoutcomeinformationassociatedwiththeefficacyendpoint,or
APrimaryReviewistheblindedreviewofdatainwhichoneormoreindependentreviewersreviewthedatatogeneratetheoutcomeinformationassociatedwiththeefficacyendpoint.
Pseudonymization / Pseudonymizationistheprocessofde-identificationandreplacementofidentifierswithapseudonymthatisuniquetotheindividualandknownwithinthecontextofatrialbutnotlinkedtotheindividualintheexternalworld.
RandomizedIndependentTemporalImagePresentation / RandomizedIndependentTemporalImagePresentationisthesequenceofimagepresentationthateachtimepointispresentedalone,inarandomorderwithrespecttothedateofacquisition,andreviewedindependentlywithoutaccesstoothertimepoints.
ReaderIndependence / Academic,financial,trialconduct
ScheduledimagingorScheduledImagingAssessment / Scheduledimagingisimagingthatisperformedduringatrialatoneormoreofthetimepoints(orwindowassignedtoatimepoint)designatedforimagingassessmentintheprotocol.Appliestoeitheron-protocoloroff-protocolimaging,or
Examsthatarescheduledasroutineassessments.
SecondaryRead / ASecondaryReadisablindedreviewofimagingdatainwhichoneormoreindependentreviewersreviewimagestogenerateoutcomedatathatisnotpartoftheefficacyendpoints.AnexamplewouldbeareadthatispartofIntra-readeranalysis.
SensitivePersonalInformation / SensitivePersonalInformationisdatarelatedtopersonalpreferencesanddisposition.-seeEUguidance(e.g.,Ethnicity).
SequentialChronologicImagePresentation / SequentialChronologicImagePresentationisthesequenceofimagepresentationthatimagesareshowntothereviewerintheorderinwhichtheywereactuallyacquired.Inthisformat,thereviewershouldnotknowthetotalnumberoftimepointstobeassessedunlessthatinformationhasbeenpre-specifiedintheimagingcharter.(Forexample,pre-specificationisusualandcustomaryinimagingstudiesofneurodegenerativedisorders,arthritis,osteoporosis,andcongestiveheartfailure,amongothers.)
SimultaneousChronologicalImagePresentation / SimultaneousChronologicalImagePresentationisthesequenceofimagepresentationthatallimagesassociatedwithasubjectareshowntotherevieweratthesametimewithoutblindingthedateorsequenceortotalnumber.
SimultaneousRandomizedTemporalImagePresentation / SimultaneousRandomizedTemporalImagePresentationisthesequenceofimagepresentationthatallimagesassociatedwithasubjectareshowntotherevieweratthesametimeinarandomorderwithrespecttothedatebutwithoutblindingtototalnumber.
SequentialUnblinding / SequentialUnblindingSequentialinterpretationofimageswithandwithoutclinicalinformation(e.g.demography,clinicalassessments).
StatisticalAnalysisPlanforMedicalImaging / Analysisplanfocusedonprimaryefficacyanalysisandincludingstatementofnullhypothesis,studypower,statisticaltest,efficacypopulation,andhandlingofmissingoruninterpretableimages,sensitivityanalyses
TimePoint / ATimePointisadiscreteperiodduringthecourseofaclinicaltrialwhengroupsofimagingexamsorclinicalexamsarescheduledasdefinedinthestudyprotocol.
TimePointDataLock / IntheTimePointDataLock,thedataarelockedafterallofthepre-specifiedinformationassociatedwitheachtimepointisassessed.Insomeparadigms,thetimepointsareknowntobepresentedinchronologicalorder;inothers,thetimepointsmayberandomizedduringtheearlystagesoftheimageanalysisprocess(vidainfra).
TruthStandard / Singleormultipleimagemodalities
UniqueIdentifiers(UIDs): / UniqueIdentifiers(UIDs)aregloballyuniqueidentifierusedtoidentifiersimages,setsofimages,orcomponentswithinanimage.
Uninterpretable / Generallyreferringtoimagequalityassessedbytheblindedreader.
UnscheduledImaging / Unscheduledimagingisimagingthatisperformedduringatrialatatime/dateoutsidethewindowassignedtoatimepointdesignatedforimagingassessmentintheprotocol. Itmaybeadhocimagingperformedtoevaluateanunscheduledclinicalcircumstance.Itmaybeon-protocoloroff-protocolimaging.
AppendixD:Documentsincludedintheimagingprotocol(e.g.,CRFs)
Attached.
AppendixE:AssociatedDocuments(derivedfromtheimagingprotocolorsupportiveoftheimagingprotocol)
Attached.
AppendixF:TBD
AppendixG:Model-specificInstructionsandParameters
Thefollowingsectionsprovideinstructionsforvariousequipmentmodels/versionsthatareexpectedtoproducedatameetingtherequirementsoftherelevantactivity.
Thepresenceofspecificproductmodels/versionsinthefollowingtablesshouldnotbetakentoimplythatthoseproductsarefullycompliantwiththeQIBAProfile.Compliancewithaprofileinvolvesmeetingavarietyofrequirementsofwhichoperatingbytheseparametersisjustone.Todetermineifaproduct(andaspecificmodel/versionofthatproduct)iscompliant,pleaserefertotheQIBAConformanceDocumentforthatproduct.
G.1.ImageAcquisitionParameters
Thefollowingtechniquetableslistacquisitionparametervaluesforspecificmodels/versionsthatcanbeexpectedtoproducedatameetingtherequirementsofSection7.1.
Thesetechniquetablesmayhavebeenpreparedbythesubmitterofthisimagingprotocoldocument,theclinicaltrialorganizer,thevendoroftheequipment,and/orsomeothersource.(Consequently,agivenmodel/versionmayappearinmorethanonetable.)Thesourceislistedatthetopofeachtable.
Sitesusingmodelslistedhereareencouragedtoconsiderusingtheseparametersforbothsimplicityandconsistency.SitesusingmodelsnotlistedheremaybeabletodevisetheirownacquisitionparametersthatresultindatameetingtherequirementsofSection7.1andconformtotheconsiderationsinSection13.
Insomecases,parametersetsmaybeavailableasanelectronicfilefordirectimplementationontheimagingplatform.
TableG.1a
Generic:ThisrepresentsparametersforagenericCT.Source:QIBAv-CTCmte Date:2009-mm-dd
Parameter / ComplianceLevel* / GenerickVp / Acceptable / 110to140
Target / 110to130
mAs
(mediumpatient) / Acceptable / 40to350
Target / 80to160
ScanDuration / Acceptable / 30sec.
Target / 15sec.
Ideal / 10sec.
TableSpeed / Acceptable
Target
*SeeAppendixCforadiscussionoftheLevelsofCompliance
kVpandmAsshouldbeadjustedasnecessary,dependingonthebodyhabitusofindividualpatients.Thevaluesshouldbeconsistentforallscansofthesamepatient.
ScanDurationvaluesareintendedtoallowcompletionofthescaninasinglebreathholdformost/amajority/nearlyallsubjectsrespectively.
TableSpeedvaluesareintendedtoyieldanIECPitchValueofapproximately1whileachievingthecorrespondingScanDuration.
TableG.1b:"Target"CompliantProtocolsforSpecificSystems
Thefollowingtableprovidessampleparameterssetsthatmeetthe“Target”LevelofComplianceforspecificmodels.
SeeAppendixCforadiscussionoftheLevelsofCompliance.
Parameters / vCT1A(Philips) / GE / ACRINMxIDT8000
(Thin) / MxIDT8000
(Thick) / Ultra / VCT-64 / 6678
DataContent
AnatomicCoverage
FieldofView:PixelSize / Rib-to-rib:0.55-.75mm
DataStructure
CollimationWidth / 16x0.75mm / 16x1.5mm / (TBA)
SliceInterval
SliceWidth / 0.8mm / 5.0mm / 1.0mm
PixelSize / 0.55mm
IsotropicVoxels / (2:1)
ScanPlane
RotationSpeed / 0.5sec
DataQuality
MotionArtifact
NoiseMetric
SpatialResolutionMetric
Acquisition
TubeVoltage / 120kVp / 120kVp / 120kVp
Exposure / 100mAs / 100mAs / 100mAs
Pitch / 1.2 / 1.2
Reconstruction
Recon.Kernel / Detailedfilter / Detailedfilter / Standard
Recon.Interval
Recon.Overlap / 50% / 50% / 20%
G.2.ImageReconstructionParameters
Seeabove.
G.3.Post-ProcessingInstructions
Noneprovided.
G.4.AnalysisInstructions
Noneprovided.
G.5.InterpretationInstructions
Noneprovided.
Page 1 of 36Version 1.4 of 9 September 2010