Paper title maximum of 20 words (Cambria 14)
First author*, second author, & Cambria 111
1Section name, institution, city, pos code
2 Cambria 10
*Email : corresponding author@Cambria 10
ABSTRACT (Cambria 12)
Abstract written in English (300 words maximum) : It should be a single paragraph. It should provide a clear view of the content of the manuscript with a brief description of the main results and conclusions. Font : Cambria 11, spacing: 1
Keywords : 5 words, Cambria 11
Introduction (Cambria 12, bold)
It should briefly place the study in a broad context and highlight why it is important. It should define the purpose of the work and its significance. The current state of the research field should be reviewed carefully and key publications should be cited. It should be written in a way that is accessible to researchers without specialist knowledge in that area. Avoid a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results. Font : Cambria 11, spacing: 1,5
Ensure that all references cited in text are listed in References and vice versa. Use an ampersand (&) between author surnames when the citation is parenthetical: (Kozlowsky & Pallardy 1997). When a citation is not parenthetical, use and: “These findings are consistent with the predictions of Mayer and Koch (2007). For citations with more than two authors, use et al.: (Marsoem et al. 2015). Do not italicize et al. List parenthetical citations chronologically (from oldest to most recent) and separate entries with a semicolon: (Siddique et al. 2012; Alemaheyu et al. 2014). Separate the years with commas when citing multiple papers by the same author: (Widyorini et al. 2015, 2016; Umemura et al. 2014).
Material and Methods (Cambria 12, bold)
Sub-section (Cambria 11, bold)
This section should be divided by subheadings. It should include the design of the study, the type of materials and tools involved, and the type of analysis used. It should be described with sufficient details to allow others to replicate and build on published results. Methods already published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be described. Font : Cambria 11, spacing: 1,5
Sub-subsection (Cambria 11, italic)
Results and Discussion (Cambria 12, bold)
It may also be broken into subsections with short, informative headings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn. Discussion should explore the significance of the results work to the current conditions or other research result, but not repeating the result. The findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible. Future research directions may also be highlighted. Font : Cambria 11, spacing: 1,5.
Table 1. Cambria 9
Remarks : Cambria 9
Figure 1. (Cambria 9)
Conclusion (Cambria 12, bold)
It contains the main points of the article. It should not replicate the abstract, but might elaborate the significant results, possible applications and extensions of the work. Font : Cambria 11, spacing: 1,5.
Acknowledgement (Cambria 12, bold)
This section is not mandatory. If required, state the names of funding bodies and grant numbers in this section. Authors may also wish to acknowledge individuals who have contributed materials, expertise or time to the study who are not named as authors. Font : Cambria 11, spacing: 1,5.
References (Cambria 12, bold)
Adrianto D, Bintang M, Kustaman E, Katayama T, Suzuki T. Effect of Eurycoma longifolia Jack on growth and testoterone level in male chicken. Hlm. 230-235.Proceedings of 1st Indonesia Wood Research Society. Masyarakat Peneliti Kayu Indonesia. 2-3 November 2009, Bogor.
Anggraeny T. 2013. Pengaruh konsentrasi alkali aktif terhadap rendemen dan sifat fisik pulp sulfat pada kayu teras dan gubal Eucalyptus pellita. Skripsi (Tidak dipublikasikan). Fakultas Kehutanan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Anjaneyulu V, Satyanarayana P, Viswanadham KN, Jyothi VG, Rao K, Radhika P. 1999. Triterpenoids from Mangifera indica. Phytochemistry 49:1229-1236.
ASTM. 1985. ASTM D-1758. Standard test method of evaluating wood preservatives by field tests with stakes. Annual Books of ASTM Standard. Philadelphia.
Asem G, Kahisiuw P, Fatem SM, Runtuboy Y, Marwa J. 2011. Prospect of Tambrauw as conservation regency in West Papua (A preliminary analysis). Hlm. 45-58 dalam Fauzi MT, Jaya KD, Yong HS, Krisbauch M, Sarjan M, Ujianto L, Latifa S, Krisdayanti BD, editor. Proceeding of the 2nd International conference on biodiversity siginificance of climate change on biodiversity in sustaining the globe, 2-4 July 2013. Universitas Mataram, Mataram.
Barly, Lelana NE. 2010. Pengaruh ketebalan kayu, konsentrasi larutan dan lama perendaman terhadap hasil pengawetan kayu. Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan 28 (1): 1-8.
Bhat KM, Florence EJM. 2003. Natural decay resistance of juvenile teak wood grown in high input plantations. Holzforschung 57:453–455.
Fengel D, Wegener G. 1989. Kayu : Kimia, ultrastruktur, reaksi-reaksi. Hlm. 63. Sastrohamidjojo H, penerjemah. Prawirohatmodjo S, editor. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Gulsoy SK, Eroglu H, Merev N. 2005. Chemical wood anatomical properties of tumorous wood in a Turkish White Oak (Quercus robur SUBSP. Robur). IAWA Journal 26(4):469-476. DOI: 10.1163/22941932-90000128
Heyne K. 1987. Tumbuhan Berguna Indonesia. Cetakan I. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan, Departemen Kehutanan, Jakarta.
Hon DNS, Minemura N. 2001. Color and discoloration. Hlm. 385-442 dalam Hon DNS, Shiraishi N, editor. Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Larson AM, Barry D, Dahal GR. 2010. Introduction. Dalam Larson AD, Barry D, Dahal GR, editor. Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform. Earthscan, London.
Martawijaya A, Kartasujana I, Mandang Y, Prawira SA, Kadir K. 2005. Atlas Kayu Indonesia. Hlm. 37-38. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan, Bogor.
Obst JR. 1998. Special (secondary) metabolites from wood. Hlm. 151–165 dalam Bruce A, Palfreyman JW, editor.: Forest Products Biotechnology. Taylor & Francis, London.
Rahayu S. 2014. Fungi and insects associated with Acacia decurrens as invasive species at Merapi volcano national park. http://iufroacacia2014.com.vn/sites/default/files/6. Diakses Agustus 2014.
Shrestha KK. 2005. Collective Action and Equity in Nepalese Community Forestry. PhD Thesis, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney. 343.
Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi. 2012. Laporan Review Zonasi Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi. Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi, Yogyakarta.
Tarumingkeng RC. 2001. Biologi dan perilaku rayap. http://www.rudyct.com/biologi_dan_perilaku_rayap.htm. Diakses September 2011.
1