BUS 303 Case Review Analysis Reviewer’s Name & Group ______Case / Group Reviewed ______

Trait / Fails Expectations (1) / Approaches Expectations (2) / Meets Expectations (3) / Exceeds Expectations (4) / Score
Writing mechanics (grammar, sentence structure, vocabulary, spelling, and punctuation) / Case has 6 or more errors. / Case has 4-5 errors. / Case has 1-3 errors. / Case is free of errors.
Circle part 1 grade / 0.2 / 0.4 / 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.6 / 1.8 / 2.0 / 2.2 / 2.4 / 2.6 / 2.8 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.8 / 4.0 / ……………….
Identification of stakeholders and their frames of reference. Understands why/how people have different ideas about what ethical solutions would be? How do frames of reference (politics, environment, demographics culture) shape / inform positions? / Little understanding of why / how people developed ideas about ethical solutions in the case. Little grasp of the importance of demographics in shaping people’s opinions. / Understands why / how folks have different ideas about ethical solutions, but struggles to see connections amid ideas & demographics of those who put forward ideas. / Understands why / how folks have different ideas about ethical solutions. Makes a less sophisticated connection between personal attributes and ethical positions. / Clearly understands diverse factors leading to development of other ethical positions. Comprehensive, sophisticated understanding that complex role differences play in forming ethical positions.
Circle part 2 grade / 0.2 / 0.4 / 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.6 / 1.8 / 2.0 / 2.2 / 2.4 / 2.6 / 2.8 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.8 / 4.0 / ……………….
Identification of ethical issues
Identifies the sources of the ethical dilemma and / or the underlying conflicting ethical positions / Does not identify sources of the dilemma and / or does not identify the underlying conflicting ethical positions.
Does not clearly articulate the ethical problem. / Identifies some of the sources of the ethical dilemma and underlying conflicting ethical positions, but has difficulty articulating these clearly. / Clearly articulates ethical dilemma & underlying conflicting ethical positions.
Shows an understanding that individual needs be balanced with needs of the many. / Clearly identifies / articulates ethical dilemma & the underlying conflicting ethical positions.
Shows understanding that needs of the individual must be balanced with needs of the many.
Applies & recognizes relevant ethical theories.
Circle part 3 grade / 0.2 / 0.4 / 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.6 / 1.8 / 2.0 / 2.2 / 2.4 / 2.6 / 2.8 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.8 / 4.0 / ……………….

Change

Identify the role of change or progress (i.e. societal, technological, environmental, governance, political, etc.) that led to emergence of the case’s central ethical dilemma. / Does not identify or under-stand the role of change that led to the emergence of the ethical dilemma at the centre of this business case. / Partially identifies or under-stands the role of change that led to the emergence of the ethical dilemma at the centre of this business case. / Identifies & understands role of change and/or progress that led to the emergence of the ethical dilemma at the centre of the business case. / Shows excellent ability to identify & understand the role of change leading to emergence of the case’s ethical dilemma.
Has sophistication in understanding range of impact that change has on all stakeholders.
Circle part 4 grade / 0.2 / 0.4 / 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.6 / 1.8 / 2.0 / 2.2 / 2.4 / 2.6 / 2.8 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.8 / 4.0 / ……………….
Identification of alternatives / Student misses out on key alternatives or explanations are lacking or unclear. / Student identifies some of the possible alternatives and provides some explanation. / Student identifies all key alternatives & explains them clearly. / Student identifies all key alternatives and explains them in a sophisticated manner.
Circle part 5 grade / 0.2 / 0.4 / 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.6 / 1.8 / 2.0 / 2.2 / 2.4 / 2.6 / 2.8 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.8 / 4.0 / ……………….
Choice of alternative
Takes an ethical position and provides concrete rationale for taking that position? / Takes a position, but cannot defend it.
Does not use theory to support position taken. / Takes a position, but defence of position is weak.
Little recognition of alterna-tive or opposing positions.
Little or no theory applied, or theory is applied incorrectly. / Takes a position & success-fully defends it.
The position is informed by theory and it refutes and/or acknowledges the alternative / opposing viewpoints. / Takes a position & defends it well. Position informed by theory; refers to alternative views.
Applies creative thinking to address dilemmas in the context of diverse ethical frameworks.
Adapts thinking / shows sophisticated grasp of ethical problem & long-term implications.
Circle part 6 grade / 0.2 / 0.4 / 0.6 / 0.8 / 1.0 / 1.2 / 1.4 / 1.6 / 1.8 / 2.0 / 2.2 / 2.4 / 2.6 / 2.8 / 3.0 / 3.2 / 3.4 / 3.6 / 3.8 / 4.0 / ……………….
Grade ( Total / 6 ) / Comments: