APPENDIX TABLE A1. State HIV testing data, 2006.

State / Consent Law1 / No. Diagnoses / Diagnosed HIV-infected population size2 / Undiagnosed HIV-infected population size2,3 / Test Rate / Population size (≥13 yr)4
AL / W. opt-in / 9245a / 9,173 / 2,443 / 37.8% / 3,796,596
AK / None / 886b / 609 / 162 / 54.2% / 549,903
AZ / Opt-out / 7967a / 10,664 / 2,840 / 28.0% / 4,980,909
AR / None / 5528a / 4,418 / 1,177 / 46.9% / 2,311,636
CA / Opt-out / 4,9983,9 c / 116,615 p / 31,059 / 16.1% / 29,582,578
CO / V. opt-in / 61910b / 9,962 / 2,653 / 23.3% / 3,919,052
CT / V. opt-in / 49611 a / 14,241 p / 3,793 / 13.1% / 2,918,897
DE / V. opt-in / 9212 b / 3,387 p / 902 / 10.2% / 708,041
FL / V. opt-in / 4,78613 b / 81,707 / 21,762 / 22.0% / 15,204,204
GA / None / 1,64114,15 d / 32,932 p / 8,771 / 18.7% / 7,554,855
HI / W. opt-in / 21015,16 e / 2,958 p / 788 / 26.7% / 1,077,843
ID / None / 5817 f / 663 / 177 / 32.8% / 1,176,282
IL / Opt-out / 3,34818 f / 34,469 p / 9,181 / 36.5% / 10,492,937
IN / V. opt-in / 50919 g / 7,818 / 2,082 / 24.4% / 5,173,814
IA / Opt-out / 11320 b / 1,451 / 386 / 29.2% / 2,471,521
KS / None / 18321 a / 2,494 / 664 / 27.5% / 2,261,462
KY / Opt-out / 35422 b / 5,615 p / 1,495 / 23.7% / 3,489,721
LA / Opt-out / 1,04823 a / 15,299 / 4,075 / 25.7% / 3,489,815
ME / Opt-out / 9824 / 1,054 p / 281 / 34.9% / 1,122,570
MD / Opt-out / 2,14425 b / 25,516 p / 6,796 / 31.5% / 4,641,751
MA / W. opt-in / 75726 b / 18,912 p / 5,037 / 15.0% / 5,425,010


Table A1, cont’d.

State / Consent Law1 / No. Diagnoses / Diagnosed HIV-infected population size2 / Undiagnosed HIV-infected population size2,3 / Test Rate / Population size (≥13 yr)4
MI / W. opt-in / 90327 a / 12,739 / 3,393 / 26.6% / 8,375,513
MN / None / 31628 a / 5,520 / 1,470 / 21.5% / 4,265,593
MS / None / 61029 h / 7,303 / 1,945 / 31.4% / 2,355,952
MO / V. opt-in / 58930 b / 10,455 / 2,785 / 21.2% / 4,833,679
MT / V. opt-in / 1031 f / 440 p / 117 / 8.5% / 795,727
NE / W. opt-in / 13932 a / 1,453 / 387 / 35.9% / 1,446,080
NV / None / 4562,3 i / 6,343 / 1,689 / 27.0% / 2,026,579
NH / Opt-out / 6633 j / 1,039 p / 277 / 23.9% / 1,104,097
NJ / None / 2,02034 j / 32,987 / 8,786 / 23.0% / 7,197,721
NM / Opt-out / 17435 a / 2,156 / 574 / 30.3% / 1,589,146
NY / W. opt-in / 4,53336 a / 113,103 / 30,124 / 15.0% / 16,162,147
NC / None / 2,01537 j / 20,157 / 5,369 / 37.5% / 7,313,916
ND / None / 638 k / 160 / 43 / 14.1% / 537,653
OH / V. opt-in / 1,08639 a / 15,290 / 4,072 / 26.7% / 9,514,552
OK / None / 3082,3 i / 4,383 / 1,167 / 26.4% / 2,941,542
OR / V. opt-in / 22340 a / 5,861 p / 1,561 / 14.3% / 3,086,607
PA / W. opt-in / 2,1173,41 l / 32,041 p / 8,534 / 24.8% / 10,464,109
RI / W. opt-in / 1663,42 m / 2,765 p / 737 / 22.5% / 897,556
SC / None / 76843 a / 13,381 / 3,564 / 21.5% / 3,590,325
SD / None / 3444 j / 337 / 90 / 37.9% / 650,144
TN / None / 1,03045 k / 13,031 / 3,471 / 29.7% / 5,033,349


Table A1, cont’d.

State / Consent Law1 / No. Diagnoses / Diagnosed HIV-infected population size2 / Undiagnosed HIV-infected population size2,3 / Test Rate / Population size (≥13 yr)4
TX / Opt-out / 4,4503,46 l / 58,402 / 15,555 / 28.6% / 18,670,666
UT / None / 1223,47 m / 2,082 / 555 / 22.1% / 1,986,982
VT / None / 1848 n / 492 p / 131 / 13.7% / 530,841
VA / Opt-out / 1,45349 j / 18,317 / 4,878 / 29.8% / 6,342,355
WA / V. opt-in / 58350 b / 13,268 p / 3,534 / 16.5% / 5,300,939
WV / V. opt-in / 853,51 m / 1,399 / 373 / 22.8% / 1,535,710
WI / W. opt-in / 38852 o / 4,479 / 1,193 / 32.5% / 4,645,843
WY / None / 1353 b / 186 / 50 / 26.2% / 426,517

Abbreviations: w. opt-in -- written opt-in; v. opt-in -- verbal opt-in

a Data source provided number of persons aged≥13 years newly diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 2006

b Data source provided number of all persons newly diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 2006; text suggests that the proportion of cases aged <13 years is minimal

c Data source provided number of all persons newly diagnosed with HIV (not AIDS) in 2006; value was adjusted to include persons newly diagnosed with AIDS using CDC data3; text suggests that the proportion of cases age aged<13 years is minimal

d Data source provided number of persons aged≥13 years newly diagnosed with HIV (not AIDS) in 2006; value was adjusted to include persons newly diagnosed with AIDS using CDC data3

e Data source provided number of all persons newly diagnosed with AIDS in 2006; value was adjusted to include persons newly diagnosed with HIV using CDC data;3 test suggests that the proportion of cases aged<13 years is minimal

f Data source provided number of all persons diagnosed with HIV/AIDS reported in 2006; text suggests that the proportion of cases aged<13 years is minimal

g Data source provided number of all persons newly diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 2007; text suggests that the proportion of cases aged<13 years is minimal and that numbers have been stable in recent years

h Data source provided number of persons aged≥13 years newly diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 2007; text suggests that numbers have been stable in recent years

i State data source unavailable; numbers of persons diagnosed with HIV or AIDS reported in 2006 estimated from CDC data2,3

j Data source provided number of persons aged≥13 years diagnosed with HIV/AIDS reported in 2006

k Data source provided number of persons aged≥13 years newly diagnosed with HIV/AIDS in 2005; text suggests that numbers have been stable in recent years

l Data source provided number of persons aged≥13 years diagnosed with HIV (not AIDS) reported in 2006; value was adjusted to include persons newly diagnosed with HIV using CDC data3

m Data source provided number of all person diagnosed with HIV (not AIDS) reported in 2006; text suggests that the proportion of cases aged<13 years is minimal; value was adjusted to include persons newly diagnosed with HIV using CDC data3

n Data source provided number of all persons newly diagnosed with HIV/AIDS during 2006-2007; value adjusted by dividing in half

o Data source provided number of all persons diagnosed with HIV/AIDS reported in 2008; text suggests that numbers have remained stable in recent years

p HIV prevalence data unavailable; estimated by applying same HIV to AIDs ratio as observed in state with the closest AIDS prevalence value, as reported by the 2006 CDC surveillance data2

REFERENCES

1. Mahajan AP, Stemple L, Shapiro MF, King JB, Cunningham WE. Consistency of state statutes with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing recommendations for health care settings. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(4):263-269.

2. CDC. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2006. Vol 18. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/2006report/pdf/2006SurveillanceReport.pdf.

3. CDC. Diagnosis and reporting of HIV and AIDS in states with HIV/AIDS surveillance--United States, 1994-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51(27):595-598.

4. CDC WONDER On-line Database. Population projections, United States, 2004-2030, by state, age and sex. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://wonder.cdc.gov/population-projections.html.

5. Alabama DPH. Alabama AIDS and HIV quarterly statistics -- demographics (January-December 2006). Montgomery: Alabama Department of Public Health; 2009. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.adph.org/aids/assets/HIVandAIDSReport2006CompleteDemo.pdf.

6. Alaska DPH. State of Alaska epidemiology bulletin. Vol 12, No 1. Anchorage: Alaska Division of Public Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.epi.hss.state.ak.us/bulletins/docs/rr2008_01.pdf.

7. Arizona DHS. HIV/AIDS annual report 2006. Pheonix: Arizona Department of Health Services; 2009. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/hiv/pdf/2006_COUNTIES.pdf.

8. Arkansas DPH. HIV/AIDS quarterly report: as of September 30, 2007. Little Rock: Arkansas Department of Public Health; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.healthyarkansas.com/stats/hiv_aids/093007_report.pdf.

9. California DPH. HIV/AIDS surveillance report. Sacramento: California Department of Public Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/aids/Documents/HIVAIDSMergedDec08.pdf.

10. Colorado DPHE. HIV and AIDS in Colorado: surveillance report (through December 2007). Denver: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/HIV_STDSurv/MonitortheEpiDec07.pdf.

11. Connecticut DPH. Connecticut HIV/AIDS statistics through 2008. Hartford: Connecticut Department of Public Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.ct.gov/dph/lib/dph/aids_and_chronic/surveillance/city_and_county/ct_hivaids_dx_trends_table.pdf.

12. Delaware DHSS. 2006 Delaware epidemiological report. Dover: Delaware Department of Health and Social Services; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/dpc/files/hivepi2006.pdf.

13. Florida DOH. Florida HIV/AIDS annual report/epidemiological profile. 2007: Florida Department of Health; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.doh.state.fl.us/disease_ctrl/aids/trends/epiprof/aids06.pdf.

14. Georgia DHR. Georgia HIV/AIDS surveillance summary, data through December 31, 2006. Atlanta: Georgia Department of Human Resources; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://health.state.ga.us/pdfs/epi/hivstd/2006%20HIV-AIDS%20Surv%20Summary-final.pdf.

15. CDC. Approval of a new rapid test for HIV antibody. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51(46):1051-1052.

16. Hawaii DOH. HIV/AIDS surveillance semi-annual report, cases to June 30, 2007. Honolulu: Hawaii Department of Health; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://hawaii.gov/health/healthy-lifestyles/std-aids/aboutus/prg-aids/aids_rep/1h2007.pdf.

17. Idaho DHW. Idaho HIV/AIDS and STD statistics, 2006. Boise: Idaho Department of Health and Welfare; 2009. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/FamilyPlanningSTDHIV/HIVAIDS/tabid/390/Default.aspx.

18. Illinois DPH. Illinois HIV/AIDS/STD monthly surveillance update, December 2006. Springfield: Illinois Department of Public Health; 2006. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.idph.state.il.us/aids/Surv_Report_1206.pdf.

19. Indiana SDH. 2007 HIV/AIDS epidemiological data, Indiana. Indianapolis: Indiana State Department of Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.in.gov/isdh/files/chapter1-question2-2008.pdf.

20. Iowa DPH. 2007 quarter 4 HIV/AIDS surveillance report. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Public Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.idph.state.ia.us/adper/common/pdf/disease_prevention_immunization/1207_report.pdf.

21. Kansas DHE. Integrated epidemiologic profile for HIV/AIDS surveillance, prevention, and care planning 2006. Topeka: Kansas Department of Health and Environment; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.kdheks.gov/hiv/download/epi_profile2006.pdf.

22. Kentucky DPH. HIV/AIDS semi-annual report, June 2008. Frankfort: Kentucky Department of Public Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://chfs.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/90841B19-8C64-4186-AA60-D6F91C78125B/0/June2008SemiAnnualReport.pdf.

23. Louisiana DHH. Louisiana HIV/AIDS annual report and epidemiological profile 2005/2006. New Orleans: Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.dhh.louisiana.gov/offices/publications/pubs-264/2005-06%20Annual%20Report.pdf.

24. Maine DHHS. State of Maine 2008 HIV/AIDS epidemiological profile. Augusta: Maine Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/boh/ddc/documents/pdf/maine_2008_hiv_aids_epidemiologic_profile.pdf.

25. Maryland DHMH. Maryland HIV/AIDS statistics fact sheet. Baltimore: Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.dhmh.state.md.us/AIDS/Data&Statistics/Statistics/Maryland%20HIV%20Fact%20Sheet%20041808.pdf.

26. Massachusetts DPH. The Massachusetts HIV/AIDS epidemic at a glance -- detailed data tables and technical notes. Boston: Massachusetts Department of Public Health; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.mass.gov/Eeohhs2/docs/dph/aids/2008_profiles/epidemic_glance_data.pdf.

27. Michigan DCH. Annual review of HIV trends in Michigan (2002-2006). Lansing: Michigan Department of Community Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdch/MIReport08_Final_236114_7.pdf.

28. Minnesota DH. New HIV infections -- 2006. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Public Health; 2009. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/idepc/diseases/hiv/stats/inctables2006.html.

29. Mississippi SDH. 2007 Mississippi STD/HIV report. Jackson: Mississippi State Department of Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/14,0,150,134.html.

30. Missouri DHSS. 2007 epidemiological profiles of HIV, STD, and Hepatitis in Missouri. Jefferson City: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.dhss.mo.gov/HIV_STD_AIDS/2007MOSummary.pdf.

31. Montana DPHHS. Quarterly summary of Montana's cumulative HIV/AIDS cases, 1985-December 2006. Helena: Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://hivdata.hhs.mt.gov/pdf/AIDS122006.pdf.

32. Nebraska DHHS. HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2006 end of year report. Lincoln: Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.hhs.state.ne.us/hew/dpc/pdfs/PHA_PB_9_vol12no1.pdf.

33. New Hampshire DHSS. New Hampshire STD/HIV/AIDS surveillance summary report for 2003-2007. Concord: New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services; 2009. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.dhhs.nh.gov/dphs/bchs/std/publications.htm.

34. New Jersey DHSS. New Jersey HIV/AIDS report, December 31, 2006. Trenton: New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services; 2006. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.state.nj.us/health/aids/documents/qtr1206.pdf.

35. New Mexico DH. New Mexico HIV/AIDS annual surveillance report: 2006. Santa Fe: New Mexico Department of Health; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.health.state.nm.us/epi/pdf/HIV_Annual_Surv_Report_2006.pdf.

36. New York SDH. New York state HIV/AIDS surveillance report for cases diagnosed through December 2006. Albany: New York State Department of Health; 2008. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.health.state.ny.us/diseases/aids/statistics/annual/2006/2006-12_annual_surveillance_report.pdf.

37. North Carolina DHHS. 2006 HIV/STD surveillance report. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services; 2007. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.epi.state.nc.us/epi/hiv/pdf/std06rpt.pdf.

38. North Dakota DH. Annual number of HIV and AIDS cases diagnosed in ND 2005-2009. Bismarck: North Dakota Department of Health; 2010. Accessed 5 Jan 2011. Available from http://www.ndhealth.gov/HIV/HIV%20Data/HIV%20data.htm.