ISSUE ANALYSIS PRESENTATION
Presenter/Topic: class average 98.8 + 95= 96.9
Criteria / Points / Grade and CommentPREPARATION FOR PRESENTATION: Student posted article to online discussion board for peers by due date and they were accessible, scholarly, and were helpful to peers in understanding the issue to be discussed.
/ 10 / 10A. INTRODUCTION: The issue and its relevance to nursing was made clear. The objectives for the seminar were clear, measurable, and relevant to the issue. / 10 / 10 liked your outline in the beginning, especially how it relates to this rubric J
B. THEORY BASE: Relevant theories are discussed. At least one must be from the nursing discipline, and at least one must be from another discipline. It is clear how these theories relate to the issue being discussed, and why it is important to consider this issue from an interdisciplinary perspective. / 20 / Great choice in theories, applied Continuum of Leadership Behavior Theory well. Needed to apply the concepts of Neuman’s theory to case management, defined Neuman’s theory well. 18
C. ASSESSMENT OF THE HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT: The issue is explored from a systems framework by considering policies, resources, and quality and safety issues that may be related to this issue. Underlying assumptions are identified as well. A RCA (root cause analysis) is included. / 20 / 20 well done, RCA helped you with this assessment
D. INFERENCES and IMPLICATIONS/CONSEQUENCES: The student follows up the assessment of the healthcare environment with a thoughtful reflection on what the logical interpretation of this information, as well as the most likely outcomes related to this issue based on the various points of view. / 20 / Nice to bring in perspectives of classmates, outcomes slide was most intriguing here, would have been nice to develop this slide more for depth 18
E. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR QUALITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: Based on the analysis of the previous sections and the research/literature reviewed, the student shares realistic interventions or strategies that could improve quality and safety related to this issue. QSEN competencies and a minimum of 3 ANA standards are considered in the discussion. / 20 / Great explanation and correlation with ANA and QSEN standards and competencies. An example or case study would have wrapped this up nicely 18
TOTAL POINTS / 100 / 94
DEDUCTIONS OF UP TO 30% of the grade received may be made for lack of attention to PRESENTATION PROFESSIONALISM:
Narration and demeanor is professional! The student stimulates group discussion, directs the flow of discussion, encourages balanced participation, and maintains group control in the online discussion board. The length of the seminar stays within expected time frame of 50-60 minutes. A variety of creative presentation methods are used. PP should be narrated, and the student should incorporate a variety of creative methods to engage the audience. Summarizes relevant themes. / Excellent color and lay out, the 3 different sections was very appealing, clean and broke up the content nicely, +1 J
One space issue on slide 21
FINAL GRADE after Deductions
Well done Marianne, consider the above thoughts for your paper / /100 / 95
Presenter/Topic: Marianne Lannen/ Case Management
PREPARATION FOR PRESENTATION: Student posted article to online discussion board for peers by due date and they were accessible, scholarly, and were helpful to peers in understanding the issue to be discussed. / 10/10 / Good articlesA. INTRODUCTION: The issue and its relevance to nursing was made clear. The objectives for the seminar were clear, measurable, and relevant to the issue. / 10/10 / Very relevant
B. THEORY BASE: Relevant theories are discussed. At least one must be from the nursing discipline, and at least one must be from another discipline. It is clear how these theories relate to the issue being discussed, and why it is important to consider this issue from an interdisciplinary perspective. / 20/20
C. ASSESSMENT OF THE HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT: The issue is explored from a systems framework by considering policies, resources, and quality and safety issues that may be related to this issue. Underlying assumptions are identified as well. A RCA (root cause analysis) is included. / 20/20 / excellent
D. INFERENCES and IMPLICATIONS/CONSEQUENCES: The student follows up the assessment of the healthcare environment with a thoughtful reflection on what the logical interpretation of this information, as well as the most likely outcomes related to this issue based on the various points of view. / 20/20
E. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR QUALITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: Based on the analysis of the previous sections and the research/literature reviewed, the student shares realistic interventions or strategies that could improve quality and safety related to this issue. QSEN competencies and a minimum of 3 ANA standards are considered in the discussion. / 15/20 / The ANA standards could have been elaborated on a bit more.
TOTAL POINTS / 95/100
DEDUCTIONS OF UP TO 30% of the grade received may be made for lack of attention to PRESENTATION PROFESSIONALISM:
Narration and demeanor is professional! The student stimulates group discussion, directs the flow of discussion, encourages balanced participation, and maintains group control in the online discussion board. The length of the seminar stays within expected time frame of 50-60 minutes. A variety of creative presentation methods are used. PP should be narrated, and the student should incorporate a variety of creative methods to engage the audience. Summarizes relevant themes. / I thought Marianne did great job on a very complex subject.
I learned a lot from this module, and have already been using this info at work.
FINAL GRADE after Deductions / 95/100
Presenter/Topic: Mariane Lannen/ Case management
Criteria / Points / Grade and CommentPREPARATION FOR PRESENTATION: Student posted article to online discussion board for peers by due date and they were accessible, scholarly, and were helpful to peers in understanding the issue to be discussed.
/ 10 / 10A. INTRODUCTION: The issue and its relevance to nursing was made clear. The objectives for the seminar were clear, measurable, and relevant to the issue. / 10 / 10
B. THEORY BASE: Relevant theories are discussed. At least one must be from the nursing discipline, and at least one must be from another discipline. It is clear how these theories relate to the issue being discussed, and why it is important to consider this issue from an interdisciplinary perspective. / 20 / 20
C. ASSESSMENT OF THE HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT: The issue is explored from a systems framework by considering policies, resources, and quality and safety issues that may be related to this issue. Underlying assumptions are identified as well. A RCA (root cause analysis) is included. / 20 / 20
D. INFERENCES and IMPLICATIONS/CONSEQUENCES: The student follows up the assessment of the healthcare environment with a thoughtful reflection on what the logical interpretation of this information, as well as the most likely outcomes related to this issue based on the various points of view. / 20 / 20
E. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR QUALITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: Based on the analysis of the previous sections and the research/literature reviewed, the student shares realistic interventions or strategies that could improve quality and safety related to this issue. QSEN competencies and a minimum of 3 ANA standards are considered in the discussion. / 20 / 18
TOTAL POINTS / 100 / 98
DEDUCTIONS OF UP TO 30% of the grade received may be made for lack of attention to PRESENTATION PROFESSIONALISM:
Narration and demeanor is professional! The student stimulates group discussion, directs the flow of discussion, encourages balanced participation, and maintains group control in the online discussion board. The length of the seminar stays within expected time frame of 50-60 minutes. A variety of creative presentation methods are used. PP should be narrated, and the student should incorporate a variety of creative methods to engage the audience. Summarizes relevant themes.
FINAL GRADE after Deductions / /100 / 98
Presenter/Topic: Marianne Lannen – “Case Management”
Criteria / Points / Grade and CommentPREPARATION FOR PRESENTATION: Student posted article to online discussion board for peers by due date and they were accessible, scholarly, and were helpful to peers in understanding the issue to be discussed.
/ 10 / 10 – great article and stimulating conversation!A. INTRODUCTION: The issue and its relevance to nursing was made clear. The objectives for the seminar were clear, measurable, and relevant to the issue. / 10 / 10
B. THEORY BASE: Relevant theories are discussed. At least one must be from the nursing discipline, and at least one must be from another discipline. It is clear how these theories relate to the issue being discussed, and why it is important to consider this issue from an interdisciplinary perspective. / 20 / 20
C. ASSESSMENT OF THE HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT: The issue is explored from a systems framework by considering policies, resources, and quality and safety issues that may be related to this issue. Underlying assumptions are identified as well. A RCA (root cause analysis) is included. / 20 / 20
D. INFERENCES and IMPLICATIONS/CONSEQUENCES: The student follows up the assessment of the healthcare environment with a thoughtful reflection on what the logical interpretation of this information, as well as the most likely outcomes related to this issue based on the various points of view. / 20 / 20
E. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR QUALITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: Based on the analysis of the previous sections and the research/literature reviewed, the student shares realistic interventions or strategies that could improve quality and safety related to this issue. QSEN competencies and a minimum of 3 ANA standards are considered in the discussion. / 20 / 20 – Above and beyond the requirements
TOTAL POINTS / 100 / 100
DEDUCTIONS OF UP TO 30% of the grade received may be made for lack of attention to PRESENTATION PROFESSIONALISM:
Narration and demeanor is professional! The student stimulates group discussion, directs the flow of discussion, encourages balanced participation, and maintains group control in the online discussion board. The length of the seminar stays within expected time frame of 50-60 minutes. A variety of creative presentation methods are used. PP should be narrated, and the student should incorporate a variety of creative methods to engage the audience. Summarizes relevant themes. / -0 Great Job Marianne! Your presentation was VERY thorough, and you did a great job of covering a very pertinent and applicable topic. All nurses benefit from learning more about case management!
FINAL GRADE after Deductions / /100 / 100
Presenter/Topic: Marianne Lannen/ Case Management
Criteria / Points / Grade and CommentPREPARATION FOR PRESENTATION: Student posted article to online discussion board for peers by due date and they were accessible, scholarly, and were helpful to peers in understanding the issue to be discussed. / 10 / 10
Adequate response to peers.
A. INTRODUCTION: The issue and its relevance to nursing was made clear. The objectives for the seminar were clear, measurable, and relevant to the issue. / 10 / 10
Clear and to the point
B. THEORY BASE: Relevant theories are discussed. At least one must be from the nursing discipline, and at least one must be from another discipline. It is clear how these theories relate to the issue being discussed, and why it is important to consider this issue from an interdisciplinary perspective. / 20 / 20
The theory for this topic was appropriate.
C. ASSESSMENT OF THE HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT: The issue is explored from a systems framework by considering policies, resources, and quality and safety issues that may be related to this issue. Underlying assumptions are identified as well. A RCA (root cause analysis) is included. / 20 / 20
Good examples of polices, resources, and quality and safety issues for readers
D. INFERENCES and IMPLICATIONS/CONSEQUENCES: The student follows up the assessment of the healthcare environment with a thoughtful reflection on what the logical interpretation of this information, as well as the most likely outcomes related to this issue based on the various points of view. / 20 / 20
Excellent reflection and understandable interpretation of the issue
E. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR QUALITY AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: Based on the analysis of the previous sections and the research/literature reviewed, the student shares realistic interventions or strategies that could improve quality and safety related to this issue. QSEN competencies and a minimum of 3 ANA standards are considered in the discussion. / 20 / 20
Clear and thorough analysis of issue for quality and safety improvements.
TOTAL POINTS / 100 / 100
DEDUCTIONS OF UP TO 30% of the grade received may be made for lack of attention to PRESENTATION PROFESSIONALISM:
Narration and demeanor is professional! The student stimulates group discussion, directs the flow of discussion, encourages balanced participation, and maintains group control in the online discussion board. The length of the seminar stays within expected time frame of 50-60 minutes. A variety of creative presentation methods are used. PP should be narrated, and the student should incorporate a variety of creative methods to engage the audience. Summarizes relevant themes.
FINAL GRADE after Deductions / /100
ISSUE ANALYSIS PRESENTATION