August 3, 2017

TheHonorableRyan Zinke

Secretary

U.S. Departmentof theInterior

1849CStreetNW

Washington, D.C. 20240

DearSecretaryZinke:

Sportsmen and women have long valued the sagebrush ecosystem that harbors multiple species of wildlife like pronghorn, wild sheep,mule deer, and the greater sage grouse. This ecosystem also provides extraordinary recreation, and multiple uses for our country’s economic needs. That’s why theundersigned sportsmen-conservation organizations are writing in regard to your Secretarial Order No. 3353 that will evaluate federal conservation plans for sage grouse. Our groups agree that a review of these conservation plans by the new administration is reasonable to expect, but we have some concerns and recommendations for you and your review team.

The successful not-warranted decision by the US Fish and Wildlife Service in September 2015 that we all support came after years of coordination with the states and many stakeholders. Importantly, the not-warranted decision was heavily dependent on the full implementation of federal and state plans – without delay – and combined with voluntary efforts on private lands.

We support some of the stated goals in the Order, like strengthening cooperation with the states and implementing training for BLM staff. However, we cannot support major changes or disruptions to federal conservation plan implementation in sage country across the West.We realize that some states have remaining issues with the federal plans, but believe those issues can be resolved with administrative approaches rather than lengthy plan amendments. Our groups strongly encourage the Department to use these options along with stronger communication and training at local levels to ensure balanced multiple useswhile delivering conservation outcomes for sagebrush and sage grouse set forth in those plans.

We also strongly discourage changing the habitat focus employed by state and federal plans, and do not support the use of captive breeding programs, predator control, or disease management over conserving and restoring priority habitat needed by sage grouse and other sagebrush-dependent species. The aforementioned tools already are available to state wildlife agencies if they choose to use them, but are not designed to be strategies for conservation as stand-alone efforts. Habitat conservation is the foundation for successful ecosystem conservation, including sagebrush steppe in the West.

Thank you for considering our concerns as your team finalizes its report and you consider any decisions on the conservation of sage grouse. We ask that you keep this historic collaboration and conservation effort moving forward and requestany future decisions in regard to federal sage grouse plansbe developed in an open and transparent process that we may engage in further. Sportsmen and women value the sagebrush ecosystem that is home to more than 350 different species of plants and animals, including such iconic species like mule deer, pronghorn and elk that are important to our groups, our economy and our western way of life.

Sincerely,

Idaho

Idaho Backcountry Hunters & Anglers

Idaho Chukar Foundation

Idaho Falconers Association

Idaho Hunter Education Association

Idaho Trout Unlimited

Oregon

Friends of the Owyhee

Oregon Backcountry Hunters & Anglers

Oregon Wildlife Foundation

Izaak Walton League OR Division

Nevada

Fraternity of the Desert Bighorn

Nevada Bighorns Unlimited, Reno Chapter

Nevada Bighorns Unlimited, Fallon Chapter

Nevada Conservation League Education Fund

Nevada Muleys

Wyoming

Muley Fanatic Foundation

Shoot & Cast

Western Bear Foundation

Wyoming Backcountry Hunters & Anglers

Wyoming Sportsmen for Federal Lands