United african movement
______
______
Alton h. Maddox, jr. Tel.: (718) 834-9034
Chairman Fax : (718) 884-8241
P.O. Box 35
Bronx, NY 10471
DSK and a “White Hoax”
By Alton H. Maddox, Jr.
If you believe in natural law and in the proposition that a leopard is unable to change its spots and that a zebra is unable to change its stripes, you are certain that no white man, including Dominique Strauss-Khan (DSK), would go to prison for raping a female of African ancestry in the United States.
Blacks are misfocused. They believe that justice under the U.S. Constitution will eventually arrive in the United States. This is “Mission Impossible”. The system of justice is like a machine. The outcome is always predictable. Even if the white man had been a pauper and the complaining witness had been Beyoncé, the white, judicial, supremacist machine would have produced the same result.
Unless New York initiates a criminal prosecution against the supposed, African complainant, there will be no proof that this incident had ever happened at the Sofitel New York. A grand jury proceeding is secret and the identity of the rape victim is shielded. Secrecy fuels a “white hoax”.
New York, for example, refused to initiate a juvenile delinquency proceeding against Tawana and no civil action, without any semblance of personal jurisdiction, was ever initiated against her. This allowed the special prosecutor to make unsubstantiated charges against Tawana without affording her with an appropriate forum to respond to them. This is state-sponsored defamation.
The most important phase of a criminal prosecution is the application for bail. A bail decision is the tell-tale sign of the seriousness of the criminal prosecution. There is also something called judicial overkill in setting bail terms. This was the case with respect to DSK. Compare the legal philosophy of Justice Bruce Wright.
It is unheard of for any white person, without a criminal record and is accused of rape, to be subjected to $1 million cash bail and a $5 million bond; 24-hour home confinement with an ankle bracelet; and housing restrictions costing $250, 000 monthly. These conditions, even for DSK, violate the Eighth Amendment. Any lawyer worth his or her salt would have immediately filed a writ of habeas corpus.
This case against the African female is a “perjury trap”. The late Michael Jackson woke up and smelled the coffee before Benjamin Brafman was able to have represented him in California for being a pedophile. This was also a judicial trap. When a rape victim secures new counsel, a red flag should be raised.
This “hoax” was cooked up by the Illuminati and Freemasonry to “kill two birds with one stone”. ABC-TV broke the news about the case against DSK unraveling on this past Thursday evening. “Nightline” ran with the ball. It was announced that a full report would be given on ABC-TV’s “Good Morning America” on Friday. Stay tuned.
Without checking any advertising source, my guess is that ABC-TV won the ratings war on this past Friday morning. It did not hurt that Beyoncé would be its star attraction on “Good Morning America” and in Central Park which was formerly “Seneca Village” and its residents were Blacks in the nineteenth century.
During the week, a New York tabloid would reveal a fraction of Beyonce’s hindpart. Her husband, Jay-Z, is, reportedly, a member of the Freemasonry. Brafman had also successfully represented Sean Combs in a gun prosecution in Manhattan Supreme Court. The fatal link was Johnnie Cochran. The registered trademark of Sean Combs Co. is interesting. The bold lettering could suggest “Beyoncé”.
Unless New York indicts this African immigrant on a perjury charge in addition to possible charges of money laundering and drug-dealing, there will be no proof of her actually perpetrating a hoax. A criminal prosecution would also unveil her grand jury testimony. This inaction may be a copycat of the judicial against Tawana Brawley.
DNA has no application in Manhattan when a person of African ancestry is seeking to use it as a defense in a criminal prosecution or when the district attorney is seeking to use it against a white defendant for allegedly raping a Black female. DNA also was of no help in exonerating the “Central Park 6”.
Unfortunately, I am the only person in New York City to have unqualifiedly complained about a double standard of justice. New York would eventually gag me without any community protest. This was a bad omen for Black women. Either leading Blacks in New York have become prostitutes or the Black masses are terrified of white supremacists. In any event, Blacks are being constitutionally-shortchanged.
In addition to Michael Jackson, Tawana Brawley was also, nonetheless, a “winner”. After the District Attorney of Dutchess County knew that Steven Pagones, his employee, was a suspect in the kidnapping and rape of Tawana Brawley, his prosecutor’s office immediately convened a grand jury to seal the lips of Glenda and Tawana Brawley. It failed.
New York was forced to appoint a special prosecutor, Robert Abrams. William Grady, the District Attorney of Dutchess County, had to give up Pagones’ identity. I pierced the corporate veil and ran with Pagones’ name. New York was peeved. I had put the spotlight on Steven Pagones. He mistakenly believed that his criminal conduct would go undetected.
For my insight and foresight, I had to be summarily disbarred. Eventually, every activist, leading Black and leading media personality in New York would run from me as though I was “Nat Turner”. I have been censored by the Black media. Since New York had gone to those extreme measures against me, it is clear to me that the “Empire State” has no appetite for prosecuting a wealthy white man for raping an African female.
The record is unambiguously clear that Steven Pagones and the late Harry Crist, Jr., among others, kidnapped and raped Tawana. The autopsy report of Harry Crist, Jr. shows that he was murdered. No statute of limitations exists for murder in New York. The murderers can still stand trial for Crist’s death.
Law enforcement personnel in New York had insisted that he had killed himself even though no gun was found anywhere near his body and the suicide note, which Crist never authored, vanished. Robert Abrams, the special prosecutor, unsuccessfully tried to bury the incriminating autopsy report. Dead men tell no tales.
Until 1868, Black females were expressly prohibited by law from giving testimony in rape cases against white males. Today, the Tawana Brawley case, the Duke lacrosse case and now the DSK case provide a common thread. Any Black woman who gives testimony against a white male will be constructively or expressly defamed if not criminalized.
Any Black man who stands up for a Black female will be given the boot in the Black “community”. Of course, every fleeing suspect from the truth will provide a false reason for non-support. The bottom line is that the defender of Black women will be exiled. Even the most militant Blacks will leave a cloud of dust rather than confront white supremacists.
Similarly, any white man who seeks to enforce the law to protect a Black rape victim will suffer the same treatment as myself. In the Duke lacrosse case, the District Attorney of Durham County was disbarred. Cong. Walter B. Jones of North Carolina asked presidential candidate Barack Obama to write a letter to North Carolina authorities demanding the district attorney’s disbarment. He did and the district attorney is history.
There is a cabal in the United African Movement which has joined forces with the black-and-white Freedom Party to suppress a political voice for Blacks. These dissenters had previously joined Robert Abrams in the Tawana Brawley case and had cried crocodile tears for Patricia Meili at Metropolitan Hospital while seven boys were being framed in Manhattan Supreme Court. Compare the Martinsville 7.
Three hundred years ago, the slave code was in full effect and force in New York. Black females were barred from the witness stand under any circumstance. Today, prosecutors entrap them. The net result is the same. They are unable to testify against white men for the crime of rape.
I made this observation in 1987 after six white men in New York had raped fifteen year-old Tawana Brawley with impunity. Because I had vigorously and competently represented her, she was defamed and illegally required to compensate her white rapist, Steven Pagones, even though the court lacked personal jurisdiction over her.
Her mother, Glenda Brawley, had to flee New York earlier for refusing to violate the parent-child relationship and I was disbarred for refusing to violate the attorney-client relationship. A Black female in New York, who makes a truthful accusation of rape against a white man, is also not entitled to legal representation.
4