INTERNAL EVALUATION

Partner: SDEDate: 1 April

Period Covered by this Review: 1 October 2014 to 30 Mar 2015

Please complete this form to record the activities and progress in the period.

Communication with partnership:
Which partners have you had communications with?
How often and in which way have you communicated with partners? / By email with all partners (about the course manual and books)
By telephone with the promoter
Emails on a weekly/daily basis
Phone on a near weekly basis
Communication with external stakeholders:
Examples of direct communication with e.g. decision takers, policy makers, and the target groups / SDE disseminated the Methods ideas at a round table presentation in Porto during the EfVET conference in October.
Presented the project website and outcomes at project meetings in Malta (Clil4U project).
Presented the Methods courses and materials in Hoorn in December as part of the EMEU kickoff meeting and in Castro (Spain) at the EUMOB project meeting
A meeting with teachers at Studieskolen in Copenhagen where the products and manuals were introduced to the teachers, and guidance in the use of the materials was given.
Methods project presented at the Forum des RUP in Bruxelles, Belgium, where stakeholders and political persons participated and expressed interest in the project.
Contact with the European Centre for modern languages (ECML) in Denmark, who had expressed interest in the project, also asking to include the project resources in their resource section and possibly including them in the an updated European language portfolio database.
Innovatory aspects:
Describe any innovatory aspects to your activities. / In dissemination use of season greetings has resulted in feedback from our target sectors.
Teachers at Studieskolen are actively using the methods in their classes as a result of the presentation.
The possibility of including a vocational approach to language learning/teaching in the European language portfolio, which prior to this contact, had not been included in their plans, due to lack of knowledge about the work done in this area within vocational education.
The project has also resulted in opening the eyes of the population, that language teaching is indeed a competence that exists within the vocational education sector.
Management:
Do you feel that information relating to the management of the project is sufficient, relevant and effective? (Please comment).
Give a rating on a scale of 5 to 1.
5 being the the most positive. / Management appears excellent both financial and content management is visible and encouraging.
5.
Dissemination:
List of dissemination activities you have been engaged in. / Editing and posting two newsletters to +820 recipients, the newsletter was forwarded to +2000 educational institutions across Spain (through the CECE network and the EfVET network.
Brochures handed out 200during the EfVET conference in Porto.
Website updates on a weekly basis
External impact/mainstreams:
Any multiplier effect/impact. / The updated CALL book was referred to during the Clil4U pilot course in Malta, March 2015
Overall comment: / The six months have been busy and resulted in a good partnership with a clear transnational dimension.
Summary of Local Activities in the period:
Weekly updates of project website with information on progress and events
Editing of two project Newsletters
Disseminated the Books and .pdf versions of the eBooks
Milestones met:
Website updated
Two newsletters edited, compiled, and mailed to the target groups
Dissemination in Malta as part of teacher courses
Delays (if any) in planned activities and outputs:
n.a.
If applicable how will the team compensate for the delays and catch up:
n.a.
Other comments:

Partnership progress review Page 1 of 1