Appendix II

Round 1 - Statements and Voting Results

R1Q1 – Cerebellar Mutism (CM) refers to transient loss or severe reduction of speech that follows lesions of the cerebellum as opposed to the cerebrum or lower cranial nerves. Its unique features are delayed onset (1 - 7 days) and limited duration (1 day - 2 or more years) followed by a recovery period where speech is marked by dysarthria.

Strongly agree 14/27 (51.85%)

Agree 7/27 (25.93%)

Agree with amendment 5/27 (18.52%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 0/27 (0.00%)

Disagree (but really agree w/amendment) 1/27 (3.70%)

Support 96%

R1Q2 – CM is the hallmark characteristic of the more broad Posterior Fossa Syndrome (PFS)

Strongly agree 10/27 (37.04)

Agree 12/27 (44.44%)

Agree w/amendment 2/27 (7.41%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 0/27 (0.00%)

Disagree 3/27 (11.11%)

Support 89%

R1Q3 - Symptoms of the PFS may occur within neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric and neurological domains, and are characterized by:

·  language- and speech-related problems, including CM (see Q1 and Q2)

·  cognitive impairment

·  affective or behavioral symptoms or both

·  motor problems

Strongly agree 13/27 (48.15%)

Agree 11/27 (40,74%)

Agree w/amendment 1/27 (3.70%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 1/27 (3,70%)

Disagree 1/27 (3,70%)

Support 93%

R1Q4 - In addition to typical cerebellar signs (e.g. ataxia of gait, hypotonia, tremor, nystagmus), motor problems of the PFS can include hemiparesis and cranial nerve palsies.

Strongly agree 6/27 (22,22%)

Agree 8/27 (29,63%)

Agree w/amendment 1/27 (3.70%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 7/27 (25.93%)

Disagree 5/27 (18,52%)

Support 56%

R1Q5 – Symptoms of the PFS may occur in different combinations and may vary in severity (NB one respondent skipped this question)

Strongly agree 17/26 (65.38%)

Agree 8/26 (30,77%)

Agree with amendment 1/26 (3.85%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 0/26 (0.00%)

Disagree 0/26 (0.00%)

Support 100%

R1Q6 - The PFS is most commonly observed in children. It is rarely seen in adults.

Strongly agree 7/27 (25.93%)

Agree 11/27 (40.74%)

Agree with amendment 1/27 (3.70%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 5/27 (18.52%)

Disagree 3/27 (11.11%)

Support 70%

R1Q7 - The PFS is most commonly observed after posterior fossa tumor surgery, but may also occur following trauma, vascular incidents and infections.

Strongly agree 12/27 (44.44%)

Agree 6/27 (22.22%)

Agree with amendment 0/27 (0,00%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 6/27 (22.22%)

Disagree 3/27 (11.11%)

Support 67%

R1Q8 - In order to be diagnosed with the PFS, a patient needs to have CM + symptoms belonging to at least 2 out of the 3 following categories: cognitive, affective/ behavioral, motor.

Strongly agree 4/27 (14.81%)

Agree 10/27 (37.04%)

Agree with amendment 2/27 (7.41%)

Nor sure if I agree or disagree 4/27 (14.81%)

Disagree 7/27 (25.93%)

Support 59%

R1Q9 - To aid diagnosis, the following is recommended pre- and post-operatively in tumor patients and as soon as the PFS is suspected in non-tumor patients:

·  MRI, preferably also DWI and DTI

·  Full neurological examination

·  Psychiatric evaluation (important to exclude delirium)

·  Neuropsychological testing

·  Speech and language assessment

·  Systematic scoring of PFS symptoms with a specific PFS scoring scale (more about such a scale in Round 2)

Strongly agree 9/27 (33.33%)

Agree 9/27 (33.33%)

Agree with amendment 4/27 (14.81%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 2/27 (7,41%)

Disagree 3/27 (11,11%)

Support 81%

R1Q10 - This first round has been dedicated to definition and diagnosis of PFS and CM. Round two will focus on monitoring of acute and late sequelae (follow-up) and the need for a new PFS scoring scale, but it will also allow for voting on other topics. Are there any other important statements that you think we should include?

No 20/27 (76.92%)

Yes 6/27 (23.08%)

Suggested topics from respondents

The effects of different surgical methods; description of specific neurologic symptoms; duration of symptoms; standardized testing of speech and processing speed; PFS as subtype of CCAS; how to avoid the syndrome; the most accurate terms to be used for the mutism versus cognitive and behavioral features and motor disabilities.

Round 2 - Statements and Voting Results

Modifications in statements from R1 that were presented again in R2 are written in italics.

R2Q1 (modified) - Cerebellar Mutism (CM) refers to transient loss or severe reduction of speech that follows lesions of the cerebellum as opposed to the cerebrum or lower cranial nerves. It often includes delayed onset (1 – 7 days), and is further characterized by limited duration (1 day - 2 or more years) followed by a recovery period where speech is marked by dysarthria.

Strongly agree 11/29 (37.93%)

Agree 14/29 (48.28%)

Agree with amendment 3/29 (10.34%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 1/29 (3.45%)

Disagree 0/29 (0.00%)

Support 96%


R2Q2 (modified) - The PFS is most commonly reported in children after posterior fossa tumor surgery, but adult cases have also been described (though less frequently).

Strongly agree 11/29 (37.93%)

Agree 15/29 (51.72%)

Agree with amendment 0/29 (0.00%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 3/29 (10.34%)

Disagree 0/29 (0,00%)

Support 90%

R2Q3 (new) - The relationship between Mutism and Pseudobulbar Palsy, Cerebellar Mutism (CM), Mutism and Subsequent Dysarthria (MSD), Cerebellar Mutism Syndrome (CMS) and the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS) needs clarification.

Strongly agree 15/29 (51.72%)

Agree 11/29 (37.93%)

Agree with amendment 1/29 (3.45%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 2/29 (6.90%)

Disagree 0/29 (0,00%)

Support 93%

R2Q4 (modified) - To aid diagnosis of the PFS, the following is recommended pre-operatively in patients who are to undergo surgery for a posterior fossa tumor:

Mandatory

·  Full neurological examination

·  MRI, preferably with DWI and DTI sequences

·  Systematic scoring of PFS symptoms with a specific PFS scoring scale

Optional

·  Psychiatric evaluation (to exclude delirium)

·  Brief/focused neuropsychological testing

·  Brief speech and language assessment

Strongly agree 8/29 (27.58%)

Agree 12/29 (41.38%)

Agree with amendment 5/29 (17.24%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 2/29 (6.90%)

Disagree 2/29 (6.90%)

Support 86%

R2Q5 (modified) - In addition to typical cerebellar signs (e.g. ataxia , hypotonia, tremor, nystagmus), motor problems of the PFS can also include hemiparesis and cranial nerve palsies in case of brainstem involvement.

Strongly agree 8/29 (27.58%)

Agree 11/29 (37.93%)

Agree with amendment 1/29 (3.45%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 7/29 (24.14%)

Disagree 2/29 (6.90%)

Support 69%

R2Q6 (new) - For diagnostic and follow-up purposes, a new formal PFS scoring scale is needed to assess the presence, severity and duration of common symptoms within all domains of the PFS:

·  Language- and speech-related problems (including CM)

·  Cognitive features

·  Affective/behavioral features

·  Motor/neurological features

Strongly agree 16/29 (55.17%)

Agree 10/29 (34.48%)

Agree with amendment 2/29 (6.90%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 1/29 (3.45%)

Disagree 0/29 (0,00%)

Support 97%

R2Q7 (new) - To ensure feasibility, this scale needs to be:

·  Brief

·  Sensitive and specific

·  Valid and reliable

·  Applicable to both children and adults

·  Suited to bedside assessment of a potentially uncooperative patient, and to later follow-up assessments at different time points

·  Easily and reliably administered by different professionals alike (doctors, nurses, neuropsychologists etc.) with limited inter-rater variation

Strongly agree 17/29 (58.62%)

Agree 8/29 (27.58%)

Agree with amendment 2/29 (6.90%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 2/29 (6.90%)

Disagree 0/29 (0.00%)

Support 93%

R2Q8 (new) - To assess prognosis, the scale needs to allow for:

·  Grading of the severity of symptoms

·  Documenting the duration of symptoms

Strongly agree 17/29 (58.62%)

Agree 9/29 (31.03%)

Agree with amendment 0/29 (0.00%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 2/29 (6.90%)

Disagree 1/29 (3.45%)

Support 90%

R2Q9 There was disagreement/confusion within the selection committee about the following statements (A-F). This may have been due to wording or phrasing, and indicates in any case a need for further debate around the issues they address. We will not be voting on them now, but have the opportunity to discuss them in further detail during the consensus meeting. Would you care to comment on any of them now?

A - In order to be diagnosed with the Posterior Fossa Syndrome (PFS), a patient needs to have CM + symptoms belonging to at one (as opposed to two) out of the following categories:

·  Cognitive

·  Affective/behavioral

·  Motor

B - Motor problems of the PFS can also include more specific neurological symptoms like transient cerebellar eye closure, cortical blindness, compulsive pre-sleep disorder, urinary retention/incontinence.
C - The cognitive, affective and linguistic symptoms of the PFS (excluding CM and motor signs) are the same as those of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS), described by Schmahmann and Sherman in 1997.

D - Cognitive, affective and linguistic problems that have been described in pediatric and adult patients following trauma, vascular incidents and infections represent the CCAS (not the PFS).
E - The PFS can be described as a severe post-operative manifestation of the CCAS, which in addition to cognitive and affective symptoms also includes CM and (often specific) motor signs.

F - In research context, the following is recommended at regular intervals during the first 2 years post-diagnosis of the PFS:

·  MRI

·  PFS scoring scale

·  Psychiatric evaluation

·  Full neurological examination

·  Language and speech testing

·  Detailed neuropsychological testing

·  QOL assessment with PedsQL

Round 3 - Statements and Voting Results

R3Q1. Post-operative Pediatric CMS is characterized by delayed onset mutism/reduced speech and emotional lability after cerebellar or 4th ventricle tumor surgery in children.

Strongly agree 23/30 (76.66%)

Agree 7/30 (23.33%)

Agree with amendment 0/30 (0.00%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 0/30 (0.00%)

Disagree 0/30 (0.00%)

100% support

R3Q2. Additional common features include hypotonia and oropharyngeal dysfunction/dysphagia.

Strongly agree 15/30 (50.00%)

Agree 11/30 (36.66%)

Agree with amendment 0/30 (0.00%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 4/30 (13.33%)

Disagree 0/30 (0.00%)

87% support

R3Q3. It may frequently be accompanied by the cerebellar motor syndrome, cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome and brain stem dysfunction including long tract signs and cranial neuropathies

Strongly agree 15/30 (50.00%)

Agree 14/30 (46.66%)

Agree with amendment 0/30 (0.00%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 1/30 (3.33%)

Disagree 0/30 (0.00%)

97% support

R3Q4. Although recovery may be prolonged, the mutism is always transient; other deficits often persist. Mutism recovers, but speech and language do not become normal

Strongly agree 12/30 (40.00%)

Agree 12/30 (40.000%)

Agree with amendment 3/30 (10.00%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 2/30 (6.66%)

Disagree 1/30 (3.33%)

83% support, but many comments on wording

Round 4 - Statement and Voting Results

R4Q1 (modified from R3). The mutism is always transient, but recovery from CMS may be prolonged. Speech and language may not return to normal, and other deficits of cognitive, affective and motor function often persist.

Strongly agree 17/29 (58.62%)

Agree 9/29 (31.03%)

Agree with amendment 2/29 (6.90%)

Not sure if I agree or disagree 1/29 (3.45%)

Disagree 0/29 (0.00%)

97% support