Simmons 1

Altered amygdala activation during face processing in Iraqi and Afghanistani war veterans

*Alan N. Simmons, Ph.D.1,2,3

Scott C. Matthews, M.D.1,2,3,4

Irina A. Strigo, Ph.D. 2,3

Dewleen G. Baker, M.D.1,2,3

Heather K. Donovan, B.A.1,2,3

Arame Motezadi1

Murray B. Stein, M.D. M.P.H.1,2

Martin P. Paulus, M.D.1,2,3

1Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr.San Diego, CA 92161, USA

2University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

3Center of Excellence in Stress and Mental Health, VASDHS, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr.San Diego, CA 92161, USA

4Research Service & VA Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center,VASDHS 3350 La Jolla Village Dr.San Diego, CA 92161, USA

Correspondence should be sent to:

Alan Simmons, PhD

Assistant Adjunct Professor, UCSD, Psychiatry

3350 La Jolla Dr., San Diego, CA 92161-0151B

Email:

Phone:858-642-3547

Abstract

Background:Exposure to combat can have a significant impact across a wide array of domains, and maymanifest as Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a debilitating mental illness that is associated with neural and affective sequelae.This study tested the hypothesis that combat exposed individuals with and without PTSD relative to healthy control (HC) subjects with no history of PTSD or combat exposure, would show amygdala hyperactivity during performance of a well-validated face processing task. We further hypothesized that differences in prefrontal cortex would best differentiate thecombat exposed groups with and without PTSD.

Methods: Twelve men with PTSD related to combat in Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF) and/or Iraqi Freedom (OIF), 12 male combat exposed control (CEC) subjects with a history of OEF-OIF combat exposure but no history of PTSD, and 12 HC male subjects with no history of combat exposure or PTSD completed a face-matching task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Results:The PTSD group showed greater amygdala activation to fearful versus happy faces than both the CEC and HC groups. Both the PTSD and the CEC groups relative to the HC group showed greater amygdala activation to all faces versus shapes. However, the CEC relative to the PTSD group showed greater prefrontal/parietal connectivity with the amygdala, while the PTSD group showed greater connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. The strength of connectivity in the PTSD group was inversely relatedto avoidance scores.

Conclusions:These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that PTSD is associated with a deficiency in top-down modulation of amygdalaactivation by the prefrontal cortex and shows specific sensitivity to fearful faces.

Keywords: PTSD, Combat, trauma, stress, amygdala, fMRI, emotion processing, resilience, fearful faces, insula, subgenual cingulate

Background

Soldiers exposed to combat in Operations Iraqi (OIF) and Enduring (OEF) Freedom are at high risk for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)[1], is an aversive reaction to a life-threatening, emotionally salient event [2]that is associated with increased mortality and morbidity [3]. The majority of those who experience such an event have a substantial stress response [4] that is characterized by activation in physiological and neuroendocrine systems [5-8]. Such stress responses are associated with hyperactivation in the insula and amygdala [9, 10], brain structures that are involved in processing emotional information. Amygdala activation has been strongly linked to negative affective states in fear processing [11-13] and PTSD [14-17]. A number of studies have successfully used face tasks to probe affective circuits such as the amygdala to better understand affective symptomology in PTSD [18-23]. However, amygdala activation has not been as consistent in PTSD as in other anxiety groups [10]. While a number of studies have shown amygdala hyperactivation in individuals with combat-related PTSD versus healthy controls with no history of PTSD or combat exposure[20, 23-25], a similar number of studies have shown amygdala hyperactivation in individuals with combat-related PTSD versus individuals with combat exposure but not PTSD[21, 26-28]. Other studies have shown amygdala hyperactivation in individuals with combat exposure but not PTSD relative to individuals with no history of combat exposure or PTSD[29].Although these findings suggest strongly that PTSD is related to amygdala hyperactivation, it can also be suggested that the experience of emotional trauma in and of itself may relate to significant differences in the functioning of emotional processing circuits.

Exposure to combat where there is a risk of death (i.e., Criterion A for the Diagnosis of PTSD) [30], can have significant psychiatric or cognitive repercussions [31] even when it does not result in PTSD. However, one important difference between those exposed to trauma who develop PTSD, versus those who do not, may be in the increased avoidance ofaversive experiences and emotions [32]. This maladaptive response to aversive emotions following trauma may enhance and maintain symptoms of PTSD [33] by diminishing the likelihood of fear extinction [34].

Recent neural models of PTSD and trauma exposure suggest that the functional networks associated with the amygdala may be of similar importance to understanding emotional processing as the amygdala itself [35]. These theories posit that PTSD is, in part, a manifestation of ineffective top-down modulation of the amygdala and limbic circuitry by the prefrontal cortex [15, 35]. This model has been proposed as a mechanism for the depersonalization seen in PTSD [36]. For example, it has been shown that reduced functional connections between amygdala and prefrontal cortex relates to increased levels of depersonalization following emotional trauma, suggesting that impaired functioning ofthis prefrontal modulatory network may be related to clinical symptoms in traumatized individuals [37].

The use of multiple control groups can be effective in separating the contributions of combat exposure and PTSD. Specifically, a multiple control group design is useful for testing the hypothesis that trauma disrupts emotional circuits relevant to face processing,and that the subsequent development of PTSD is related to less engagement of frontal top-down circuitry [15, 35].

Two recent papers investigated the effects of trauma and PTSD during fMRIthrough comparison of PTSD, trauma exposed, and healthy control subjects. Using a cognitive inhibition task, Falconer and colleagues found greater frontal activation in the trauma exposed and healthy control individualsversus the PTSD subjects, and greater parahippocampal activation in PTSD versus healthy control (but not trauma control) subjects[38]. New and colleagues compared how these three groups relate when down regulating emotion during performance of a negative cognitive reappraisal task and found that both healthy controls and trauma controls relative to PTSD subjects showed greater activation of frontal circuitry.However, they did not find significant differences in amygdala activation between the groups[39]. The authors ofthis paper posit that the “trauma-exposed groups may engage a more distributed cortical network in the control of emotion” (p. 662) than healthy controls, suggesting that trauma-exposed controls show greater limbic and frontal activation in the control of emotion. Both of these studies used cognitive tasks in groups with non-combat trauma exposure. In addition, PET studies have used the three group model to dissociate the biomarkers of PTSD and trauma. Phan and colleagues suggest that both trauma and PTSD groups show activations in the amygdala but the PTSD group differentially modulates the ventral medial frontal gyrus [40]. Britton and colleagues showed that the dorsal medial frontal was less active in PTSD while was there was greater ventromedial prefrontal activation[41]. These findings suggest the importance of frontal circuitry in trauma response and resilience. However, the degree to which these findings translate to a sample with combat trauma during performance of a task that probes affective brain circuits is unknown. Delineation of the effects of combat exposure and PTSD will help increase understanding of possible mechanisms of resilience or vulnerability to PTSD after exposure to trauma.

In prior studies, using a simple face-matching task, we and others have identified clinically meaningful differences in amygdala activation in groups with mood and anxiety disorders [42-44], and shown significant changes in response to psychopharmacological intervention [45, 46]. This simple face-matching task has also been successful in delineating differences in functionally connected networks in psychiatric populations [43].While facetasks do not use trauma-related stimuli and do not directly provoke re-experiencing symptoms in PTSD they do require appraisal of social emotions, thus they appear provide access to measuring affective circuitry in a theoretically and clinically meaningful way.

In the current study, we collected fMRI data in combat-exposed veterans with and without PTSD, as well as in healthy subjects during performance of a face-matching task that reliably activates the amygdala [43, 44] in an effort to understand how neural response in affective circuitry could help delineate the effects of trauma and from PTSD. Based on the literature described above, we hypothesized that PTSD individuals relative to healthy control (HC) subjects with no history of PTSD or combat exposure would show greater amygdala activation during a face matching task. Furthermore, functional connectivity between the amygdala and fronto-parietalstructures, including the dorsal lateral and medial prefrontal cortex, involved in emotion modulation would be reduced in the PTSD group in contrast to the trauma exposed groups.

Results

Demographic/Psychiatric/Behavioral Results

After correcting for multiple comparisons, the groups did not differ on several demographic variables (Table 1). The PTSD and CEC groups did not differ on combat exposure, childhood trauma severity, or depression. However, the PTSD relative to the CEC group had significantly higher scores on CAPS total and on several subscales of the CAPS. A significant difference of condition was seen in the reaction time, but not accuracy, from the face-matching task.This difference was largely powered by the shorter reaction time to the shapes versus the faces, and mirrored results from prior analysis. No group, or group by condition, differences were seen for reaction time or accuracy (see Table 1, Additional File:Supplementary Tables 2-4).

Neuroimaging Results (ROI Analyses)

Clusters of significant activation were found for all three contrasts of interest: (1) effect of PTSD, i.e., task-related activity in PTSD versus CEC subjects, (2) effect of combat exposure, i.e., task-related activity in PTSD and CEC subjects versus HC subjects, and (3) effect of task, i.e., activity for face matching minus shape matching trials in all subjects (PTSD+CEC+HC) (see Table 2). In the PTSD-CEC contrast, the right insula was significantly more activein the PTSD group and the anterior cingulate was significantly more activein the CEC group. In the PTSD+CEC-HC contrast, we found significantlygreater activation for the PTSD +CEC group in the right amygdala, whereas the left anterior cingulate was significantly more active in the HC group (see Figure 1). In the task effect, we found significant activation in the right and left amygdala, the right and left insula, and right hippocampus, as well assignificant deactivations in numerous clusters throughout the anterior cingulate, and insula (see Table 2). Additional post-hoc analysis was done contrasting the three groups on the fear-happy contrast. The PTSD group had significantly greater activation in the amygdala than both groups (Table 3) while the CEC and HC groups did not differ significantly.

Brain-Behavior Correlations

When inspected in the PTSD group alone, a significant inverse correlation was observed between the avoidance subscale (“C”) of the CAPS and right amygdala activation in the group(PTSD+CEC-HC) contrast (Spearman’s rho=-0.976, p<0.001; n=8) and the task(faces-shapes) contrast (rho=-0.796, p=0.026; n=8). No other subscales of the CAPS correlated significantly with amygdala activations.It should be noted the Fear-Happy contrast did not correlate in the group or task contrast ROIs (rho=-.228, p=.588, n=8; and rho=-.132, p=.756, n=8, respectively). The avoidance subscale was selected based on prior findings within our group[47].

Functional Connectivity Results

In order to examine differences within functional amygdala networks between the combat exposed groups (PTSD versus CEC), we performed a functional connectivity analysis with the bilateral amygdala as seed regions. This analysis revealed that the sole area that the PTSD, compared to the CEC group, showed greater connectivity with the right amygdala was in the subgenual cingulate cortex. There was no area where PTSD showed greater connectivity using the left amygdala seed.However, the CEC compared to the PTSD group showed numerous areas with significantly greater functional connections with bilateral amygdala, such as the posterior cingulate, inferior frontal, middle occipital, and superior temporal gyri (Table 4, Additional File: Supplementary Figures 1-2).

Discussion

This experiment yielded three main findings. First, individuals with PTSD and combat exposed controls (CEC) without PTSD showed significantly greater right amygdala activation during an affective face-matching task when compared to healthy controls (HC) without PTSD or combat exposure in the all faces minus contrast, while just the PTSD group was significantly higher for the fear minus happy contrast in the amygdala when contrasted with the CEC and HC groups.Second, in the PTSD group,task-related amygdala activation showed a significant inverse correlation with the severity of avoidance symptoms (as measured by the CAPS).Third, in the CEC compared to the PTSD group, the amygdala showed greater functional connectivity with frontal and parietal regions.Taken together these findings are consistent with the hypothesis that individuals with combat exposure show a generalized increased limbic activation (e.g., amygdala) versus controls without combat exposure; and that among combat exposed individuals, greater connectivity between the amygdala and frontal cortex may be associated greater resilience to the development of PTSD. Furthermore, these findings suggest that those with PTSD may attempt to “turn down” amygdala activation through avoidance.

Increased emotional reactivity in the amygdala has been linked to depression [48], anxiety [49, 50], PTSD [14], and genetic vulnerability to psychiatric disorders [51, 52]. Using the same task that was administered in the current study, we observed similar findings in major depressive disorder [42, 43],trait anxiety [44], and victims of domestic violence [19]. The amygdala has been a relatively robust measure of trauma related reactivity, especially in studies using PET scans [41, 53-56]. However, amygdala findings have been somewhat split in the PTSD literature in fMRI studies, potentially due to avoidance or similar mechanisms associated with PTSD [9, 10] and potentially due to the exact contrasts used in the analysis.In the current study, we found that amygdala activation was greater the PTSD group in the Fearful-Happy contrast. This suggests that this contrast does have specific relevance to PTSD. However, this activation did not correlate to symptom severity. In contrast, we found that combat exposure was associated with amygdala hyperactivation irrespective of PTSD in the faces versus shape contrast. Despite similarly increased amygdala activation to face minus shape processing in both combat-exposed groups in the current study, it may be that different functional mechanisms and neural networks are utilized in the PTSD and CEC groups to modulateamygdala hyperactivation. Specifically, the combat-PTSD group may potentially use a psychological mechanism (i.e., avoidance) while preliminary evidence suggests that the CEC group uses a cognitive or neural regulatory mechanism (i.e., top-down modulation).These findings further extend pervious work showing weaker connectivity with amygdala functioning in PTSD versus healthy controls [19, 57], into the comparison with trauma exposed controls. Even though amygdala activation was similar across trauma groups for when all faces were taken together, when fearful faces were separately contrasted with happy faces the PTSD group showed a significant difference with both control groups in more dorsal regions of the amygdala. These findings replicate prior data in PTSD [19-21, 24, 27] and suggests that PTSD individuals show a specific sensitivity to fearful faces that is not seen in trauma controls. These findings are in-line with relative consistency of greater sensitivity in the amygdala with regard to aversive versus positive stimuli (i.e., fearful versus happy faces). The capacity to modulate the amygdala can therefore be an effective way to control affective responses to aversive stimuli.

There is strong evidence of a reciprocal relationship between activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala in PTSD in combat veterans [54]. This work also showed that regional blood flow in the amygdala correlated positively with PTSD symptom severity while blood flow in the medial prefrontal cortex correlated negatively with PTSD symptom severity. A similar reciprocal relationship between the subgenual cingulate and amygdala has been shown in depression [58], as well as in normal controls where the rostral cingulate and lateral prefrontal cortex in conjunction appear to regulate the amygdala during processing of faces [59, 60]. Furthermore, animal and human data appear to converge on a model in which successful fear extinction is dependent on the functionality of this network [61]. Taken together, these studies suggest that this amygdala-prefrontal cortex network may play an important role in trauma exposure such that those who experience trauma and have more robust connections between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex are less likely to develop PTSD [11, 15, 35].