118VK8
Print Request: Shepard's Batch Delivery
Time of Request: Monday, July 31, 2006 09:07:59 EST
Number of Lines: 841
Print Number: 1862:111048269
Client ID/Project Name:
Note:
Research Information:
Shepard's
Send to: PUBLIC, BARNSTABLE
BARNSTABLE LAW LIBRARY
3195 MAIN ST
BARNSTABLE, MA 02630-1105
Page 1
Page 1
SHEPARD'S® - 132 F.3d 824 - 113 Citing References
Copyright 2006 SHEPARD'S(R) - 113 Citing referencesBIW Deceived v. Local S6, Indus. Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers, 132 F.3d 824, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 36795, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2148, 134 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10099 (1st Cir. Me. 1997)
SHEPARD'S Signal: Caution: Possible negative treatment
Restrictions: Unrestricted
FOCUS(TM) Terms: No FOCUS terms
Print Format: FULL
Citing Ref. Signal Legend:
{Warning} -- negative treatment indicated
{Questioned} -- validity questioned by citing refs.
{Caution} -- possible negative treatment
{Positive} -- positive treatment indicated
{Analysis} -- cited and neutral analysis indicated
{Cited} -- citation information available
SHEPARD'S SUMMARY
Unrestricted Shepard's SummaryNo negative subsequent appellate history.
Citing References:
Cautionary Analyses: / Distinguished (1)
Positive Analyses: / Followed (7)
Other Sources: / Law Reviews (4), Statutes (1), Treatises (3)
LexisNexis Headnotes: / HN1 (10), HN2 (6), HN4 (4), HN5 (9), HN6 (12), HN7 (13), HN8 (13), HN10 (18), HN11 (8), HN12 (27), HN13 (16), HN14 (16), HN15 (16), HN16 (28), HN17 (24), HN19 (5), HN20 (3), HN21 (16)
PRIOR HISTORY ( 0 citing references )
(CITATION YOU ENTERED):BIW Deceived v. Local S6, Indus. Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers, 132 F.3d 824, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 36795, 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2148, 134 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10099 (1st Cir. Me. 1997){Caution}
SUBSEQUENT APPELLATE HISTORY ( 1 citing reference )
1. / Related proceeding at:Rand v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23164, 167 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2617 (D. Me. Feb. 15, 2001){Positive}
CITING DECISIONS ( 104 citing decisions )
1ST CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
2. / Cited by:Esso Std. Oil Co. v. Rodriguez-Perez, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14628 (1st Cir. P.R. June 14, 2006) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN21{Analysis}
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14628
3. / Cited by:McCloskey v. Mueller, 446 F.3d 262, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12105 (1st Cir. Mass. 2006) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN2{Analysis}
446 F.3d 262 p.272
4. / Cited by:Scanlon v. M.V. Super Servant 3, 429 F.3d 6, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 24031, 2005 A.M.C. 2705 (1st Cir. R.I. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN2{Cited}
429 F.3d 6 p.8
5. / Cited by:Emmanuel v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Local Union No. 25, 426 F.3d 416, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22192, 178 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2261, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10554 (1st Cir. Mass. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN7, HN10, HN16{Positive}
426 F.3d 416 p.420
6. / Cited by:Rossello-Gonzalez v. Calderon-Serra, 398 F.3d 1, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26422 (1st Cir. P.R. 2004){Analysis}
398 F.3d 1 p.11
7. / Cited by:Ten Taxpayer Citizens Group v. Cape Wind Assocs., 373 F.3d 183, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12914, 2004 A.M.C. 1728, 34 Envtl. L. Rep. 20037 (1st Cir. Mass. 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1{Analysis}
373 F.3d 183 p.191
8. / Cited by:Quinn v. City of Boston, 325 F.3d 18, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 5860, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P41361, 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 724, 55 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 512 (1st Cir. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1, HN11{Caution}
325 F.3d 18 p.26
9. / Cited by:United States v. Connolly (In re Boston Herald, Inc.), 321 F.3d 174, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3479, 32 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2350 (1st Cir. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1{Positive}
321 F.3d 174 p.177
10. / Cited by:Vargas v. Geologistics Ams., 284 F.3d 232, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5365, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2859, 146 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10019 (1st Cir. P.R. 2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN8, HN10, HN16, HN20{Caution}
284 F.3d 232 p.234
11. / Cited by:Valentin v. Hosp. Bella Vista, 254 F.3d 358, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14269 (1st Cir. P.R. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN11{Caution}
254 F.3d 358 p.363
12. / Cited by:Stewart v. Dutra Constr. Co., 230 F.3d 461, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27090, 2001 A.M.C. 1116 (1st Cir. Mass. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1{Warning}
230 F.3d 461 p.465
13. / Cited by:Bull HN Info. Sys. v. Hutson, 229 F.3d 321, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 25228 (1st Cir. Mass. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN11{Caution}
229 F.3d 321 p.328
14. / Cited by:Bonilla v. Muebles J.J. Alvarez, Inc., 194 F.3d 275, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26924, 7 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) P7-105, 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1562 (1st Cir. P.R. 1999){Caution}
194 F.3d 275 p.277
15. / Cited by:Danca v. Private Health Care Sys., 185 F.3d 1, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18043, 23 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1505 (1st Cir. Mass. 1999) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN5, HN12{Caution}
185 F.3d 1 p.4
16. / Distinguished by:Trull v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 187 F.3d 88, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 16909, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P15589, 52 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (CBC) 1449 (1st Cir. N.H. 1999) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN2, HN4{Warning}
187 F.3d 88 p.95
17. / Cited by:Irving v. United States, 162 F.3d 154, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31704, 18 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 1577, O.S.H. Dec. (CCH) P31717, 1998 O.S.H. Dec. (CCH) P31717 (1st Cir. N.H. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1{Caution}
162 F.3d 154 p.160
18. / Cited by:PCS 2000 LP v. Romulus Telecomms., 148 F.3d 32, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 15332 (1st Cir. P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13{Positive}
148 F.3d 32 p.34
19. / Cited by:Futura Dev. of P.R. v. Estado Libre Asociado De P.R., 144 F.3d 7, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8986 (1st Cir. P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN21{Caution}
144 F.3d 7 p.13
20. / Cited by:Massachusetts Sch. of Law v. ABA, 142 F.3d 26, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8076, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 708 (1st Cir. Mass. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12, HN21{Caution}
142 F.3d 26 p.33
21. / Cited by:Viqueira v. First Bank, 140 F.3d 12, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6550, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 618 (1st Cir. P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN11, HN13{Positive}
140 F.3d 12 p.16
140 F.3d 12 p.17
1ST CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
22. / Cited by:George v. AT&T Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43289 (D. Mass. June 23, 2006)
23. / Cited by:
Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs, Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. AstraZeneca PLC (In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig.), 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22924 (D. Mass. Apr. 14, 2006) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1{Analysis}
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22924
24. / Cited by:Beniquez v. Pfizer Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23604 (D.P.R. Mar. 21, 2006) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13, HN21
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23604
25. / Cited by:Able Sales Co. v. Mead Johnson P.R., Inc., 420 F. Supp. 2d 1, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12216 (D.P.R. 2006) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13{Positive}
420 F. Supp. 2d 1 p.7
26. / Cited by:Southwest Boston Senior Services, Inc. v. Whatley (In re Whatley), 396 F. Supp. 2d 50, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24848 (D. Mass. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
396 F. Supp. 2d 50 p.53
27. / Cited by:Borgese v. Am. Lung Ass'n, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24169, 36 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1485, 96 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1181 (D. Me. Oct. 17, 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13, HN14, HN15, HN16, HN17, HN21{Positive}
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24169
28. / Cited by:Universal Ins. Co. v. Warrantech Corp., 392 F. Supp. 2d 205, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22672 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
392 F. Supp. 2d 205 p.208
29. / Cited by:Betancourt v. Bear Stearns & Co., 392 F. Supp. 2d 187, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22599 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
392 F. Supp. 2d 187 p.189
30. / Cited by:Broad. Networks of P.R., Inc. v. Communs. Counsel Group, Inc., 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39170 (D.P.R. Aug. 17, 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39170
31. / Cited by:Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de P.R., Inc. v. Shell Chem. Yabucoa Inc., 380 F. Supp. 2d 40, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15930, 2005-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P74917 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
380 F. Supp. 2d 40 p.43
32. / Cited by:Miara v. First Allmerica Fin. Life Ins. Co., 379 F. Supp. 2d 20, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12163, 35 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1337 (D. Mass. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1{Positive}
379 F. Supp. 2d 20 p.26
33. / Cited by:Snowdon v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 366 F. Supp. 2d 157, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2987, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17397 (D. Me. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
366 F. Supp. 2d 157 p.161
34. / Cited by:Green v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 366 F. Supp. 2d 149, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2989, CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P17398 (D. Me. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
366 F. Supp. 2d 149 p.153
35. / Cited by:Ponce Super Ctr., Inc. v. Glenwood Holdings, Inc., 359 F. Supp. 2d 27, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6983 (D.P.R. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
359 F. Supp. 2d 27 p.29
36. / Cited by:Scotiabank De P.R. v. Residential Partners S.E., 350 F. Supp. 2d 334, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26493 (D.P.R. 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
350 F. Supp. 2d 334 p.336
37. / Followed by, Cited by:Warner v. Atkinson Freight Lines Corp., 350 F. Supp. 2d 108, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25220, 34 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2598, 176 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2363, 10 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 355 (D. Me. 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN4, HN5, HN6, HN7, HN11, HN12, HN13, HN14, HN15, HN16, HN17{Caution}
Followed by:
350 F. Supp. 2d 108 p.118
Cited by:
350 F. Supp. 2d 108 p.114
38. / Cited by:Hernandez-Nieves v. Scotiabank of P.R., Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23146 (D.P.R. Oct. 1, 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23146
39. / Cited by:Alshrafi v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 321 F. Supp. 2d 150, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10331 (D. Mass. 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN10, HN14, HN17{Cited}
321 F. Supp. 2d 150 p.156
40. / Cited by:Kiedaisch v. Nike, Inc., 2004 DNH 38, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2828, 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2051 (D.N.H. 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Positive}
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2828
41. / Cited by:Mangual-Saez v. Brilliant Globe Logistics, Inc., 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27003 (D.P.R. Jan. 27, 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN16, HN17, HN21{Cited}
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27003
42. / Cited by:Thompson v. Abbott Labs. (In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig.), 309 F. Supp. 2d 165, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4785 (D. Mass. 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Caution}
309 F. Supp. 2d 165 p.170
43. / Cited by:Longden v. Philip Morris, Inc., 2003 DNH 140, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14427 (D.N.H. 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14427
44. / Cited by:Casey v. Goulian, 273 F. Supp. 2d 136, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12937 (D. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
273 F. Supp. 2d 136 p.137
45. / Cited by:Rodriguez v. Fannie Mae, 268 F. Supp. 2d 87, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10877 (D. Mass. 2003){Caution}
268 F. Supp. 2d 87 p.89
46. / Cited by:Montana v. Abbot Labs., 266 F. Supp. 2d 250, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9890 (D. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Caution}
266 F. Supp. 2d 250 p.254
47. / Cited by:Pellot v. Ford Motor Co., 263 F. Supp. 2d 303, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8335 (D.P.R. 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13{Positive}
263 F. Supp. 2d 303 p.309
48. / Cited by:Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Chao, 248 F. Supp. 2d 48, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3244 (D.R.I. 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13{Cited}
248 F. Supp. 2d 48 p.50
49. / Cited by:Sterling Consulting Corp. v. IRS (In re Indian Motocycle Mfg. Co.) , 288 B.R. 617, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1512, 91 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 707 (D. Mass. 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN17{Warning}
288 B.R. 617 p.633
50. / Cited by:Tempelman v. Colsia, 2002 DNH 172, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19037 (D.N.H. 2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN14{Analysis}
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19037
51. / Cited by:Giannetti v. Mahoney, 218 F. Supp. 2d 8, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15852, 29 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1462 (D. Mass. 2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1, HN5, HN11, HN13, HN14, HN15, HN17{Positive}
218 F. Supp. 2d 8 p.10
218 F. Supp. 2d 8 p.11
52. / Cited by:Collazo v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 217 F. Supp. 2d 189, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16119, 29 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1453 (D.P.R. 2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12, HN15{Cited}
217 F. Supp. 2d 189 p.191
217 F. Supp. 2d 189 p.192
53. / Cited by:Kingsley v. Lania, 221 F. Supp. 2d 93, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15292 (D. Mass. 2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN14, HN15, HN16, HN17, HN19, HN21{Positive}
221 F. Supp. 2d 93 p.96
54. / Cited by:Lemerich v. Int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs, Local 877, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7102, 171 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2560 (D. Me. Apr. 19, 2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN8{Analysis}
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7102
55. / Cited by:Concilio Evangelico de Puerto Rico v. Negron, 178 F. Supp. 2d 49, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23335 (D.P.R. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Cited}
178 F. Supp. 2d 49 p.51
56. / Cited by:Barbara Brawn & Ameriklean, Inc. v. Donald Coleman & Seiu, 167 F. Supp. 2d 145, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13515, 168 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2166 (D. Mass. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN10, HN12, HN13, HN14, HN15, HN16, HN17, HN19, HN21{Cited}
167 F. Supp. 2d 145 p.148
167 F. Supp. 2d 145 p.149
57. / Cited by:Dean v. Compass Receivables Mgmt. Corp., 148 F. Supp. 2d 116, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13472 (D. Mass. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13, HN14, HN15, HN17{Cited}
148 F. Supp. 2d 116 p.118
58. / Cited by:Rosado v. Instituto Medico Del Norte, 145 F. Supp. 2d 164, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7318 (D.P.R. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN16, HN17, HN21{Cited}
145 F. Supp. 2d 164 p.168
59. / Cited by:Anderson v. Chamberlain, 134 F. Supp. 2d 156, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4660 (D. Mass. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12, HN13, HN17{Cited}
134 F. Supp. 2d 156 p.160
60. / Cited by:Rand v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23164, 167 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2617 (D. Me. Feb. 15, 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN5, HN6, HN7, HN8, HN13, HN16, HN17, HN21{Positive}
61. / Cited by:
Kleinerman v. Luxtron Corp., 107 F. Supp. 2d 122, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14023 (D. Mass. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN15{Caution}
107 F. Supp. 2d 122 p.123
62. / Cited by:Guglielmo v. WorldCom, Inc., 2000 DNH 169, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10923 (D.N.H. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13, HN14, HN15, HN16, HN17, HN21{Positive}
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10923
63. / Cited by:Diaz v. General Sec. Servs. Corp., 93 F. Supp. 2d 129, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6461, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P59030, 7 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1772 (D. Mass. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN16{Cited}
93 F. Supp. 2d 129 p.134
64. / Cited by:Rand v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21226 (D. Me. Apr. 19, 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN4, HN5, HN6{Cited}
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21226
65. / Cited by:Donato v. McCarthy, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18086 (D.N.H. Nov. 18, 1999) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN5, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN16{Positive}
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18086
66. / Cited by:Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund, by and Through its Trustees v. Philip Morris, Inc., 62 F. Supp. 2d 236, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12197 (D. Mass. 1999) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1, HN11, HN17{Positive}
62 F. Supp. 2d 236 p.241
67. / Cited by:Bergeron v. Henderson, 52 F. Supp. 2d 149, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8359, 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2761, 139 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10584 (D. Me. 1999) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN5, HN6, HN7, HN10, HN16{Caution}
52 F. Supp. 2d 149 p.152
52 F. Supp. 2d 149 p.153
68. / Cited by:Sousa v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9367 (D. Mass. Apr. 16, 1999) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN7, HN10, HN16, HN17, HN19{Positive}
1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9367
69. / Cited by:Servia-Mendoza v. Burgos, 31 F. Supp. 2d 35, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20203 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12, HN14, HN15{Cited}
31 F. Supp. 2d 35 p.37
70. / Cited by:Hernandez v. State Elections Bd., 30 F. Supp. 2d 212, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19436 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN15{Analysis}
30 F. Supp. 2d 212 p.216
71. / Cited by:Hernandez-Lopez v. Puerto Rico, 30 F. Supp. 2d 205, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19522 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12{Analysis}
30 F. Supp. 2d 205 p.210
72. / Cited by:Williams v. Local Union 911, USW, 31 F. Supp. 2d 40, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19441, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2034 (D.R.I. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN6, HN7, HN14{Caution}
31 F. Supp. 2d 40 p.43
73. / Cited by:Hernandez v. State Elections Comm'n, 30 F. Supp. 2d 178, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19444 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12, HN14, HN15{Analysis}
30 F. Supp. 2d 178 p.180
74. / Followed by:Hernandez-Lopez v. Puerto Rico State Elections Comm'n, 27 F. Supp. 2d 302, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18746 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12, HN14, HN15{Analysis}
27 F. Supp. 2d 302 p.306
75. / Cited by:Popular Democratic Party v. Puerto Rico, 24 F. Supp. 2d 184, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16638 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN14, HN15, HN17{Caution}
24 F. Supp. 2d 184 p.189
76. / Cited by:Nogueras-Cartagena v. Rossello-Gonzalez, 182 F.R.D. 380, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16237 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN1, HN13{Caution}
182 F.R.D. 380 p.382
77. / Cited by:Varela-Fernandez v. Burgos, 15 F. Supp. 2d 183, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12344 (D.P.R. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN12, HN14, HN15{Positive}
15 F. Supp. 2d 183 p.185
78. / Cited by:Massachusetts Laborers' Health & Welfare Fund, by and Through its Trustees v. Philip Morris, Inc., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22501 (D. Mass. June 19, 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN14, HN15, HN17, HN21{Analysis}
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22501
1ST CIRCUIT - U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURTS
79. / Cited by:In re Indian Motocycle Co., 266 B.R. 243, 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 978 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN17{Analysis}
266 B.R. 243 p.261
2ND CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
80. / Cited by:Zomber v. Christies, Inc. (In re Auction Houses Antitrust Litig.), 42 Fed. Appx. 511, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15327, 2002-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P73757 (2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN2{Caution}
42 Fed. Appx. 511 p.517
2ND CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
81. / Followed by:Cahoon v. IBEW Local 261, 175 F. Supp. 2d 220, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19892, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11220 (D. Conn. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN6, HN10, HN16, HN17, HN19{Cited}
175 F. Supp. 2d 220 p.225
82. / Followed by:Al-Jundi v. Mancusi, 113 F. Supp. 2d 441, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16006, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2028 (W.D.N.Y. 2000){Analysis}
164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2028 p.2035
83. / Cited by:Rodolico v. Unisys Corp., 96 F. Supp. 2d 184, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6048, 164 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2199, 141 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10779 (E.D.N.Y. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN10, HN16{Caution}
96 F. Supp. 2d 184 p.188
84. / Cited by:Panczykowski v. Laborers Int'l Union, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23269, 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2110 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN16, HN17, HN21{Positive}
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23269
85. / Cited by:Caci v. Laborers' Int'l Union, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23127, 166 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2039 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN16, HN17, HN21{Analysis}
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23127
86. / Cited by:Capitano v. Laborers Int'l Union, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23110, 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3042 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN16, HN17, HN21{Analysis}
1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23110
3RD CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
87. / Cited by:Hitchens v. County of Montgomery, 98 Fed. Appx. 106, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8231, 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3247 (2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN8, HN20{Analysis}
98 Fed. Appx. 106 p.114
88. / Cited by:Scott v. Graphic Communs. Int'l Union, Local 97-B, 92 Fed. Appx. 896, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4979, 93 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 804 (2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN8, HN10, HN16{Analysis}
92 Fed. Appx. 896 p.904
89. / Cited by:Keefe v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 203 F.3d 218, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1247, 123 A.L.R.5th 697 (3d Cir. Pa. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN2, HN4{Positive}
203 F.3d 218 p.223
3RD CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
90. / Cited by:Scott v. Graphic Communs. Int'l Union, Local 97-B, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24985 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN8, HN10, HN16{Positive}
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24985
4TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
91. / Cited by:Taylor v. Giant Food, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50206 (D. Md. July 12, 2006)
92. / Cited by:
Summerville v. Local 77, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47148 (M.D.N.C. July 11, 2006)
5TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
93. / Followed by:Vancourt v. Am. Postal Workers Union, New Orleans Local # 83, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15407, 173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2428 (E.D. La. Aug. 20, 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN5, HN6, HN7, HN8{Positive}
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15407
7TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
94. / Cited by:Nelson v. Stewart, 422 F.3d 463, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 18583, 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (LRP) 68, Bankr. L. Rep. (CCH) P80355, 36 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1036, 177 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3217, 151 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P10531 (7th Cir. Ind. 2005) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN6, HN7, HN8, HN10, HN16, HN19{Analysis}
422 F.3d 463 p.465
95. / Followed by:Downey v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 266 F.3d 675, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20648 (7th Cir. Ill. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN2{Caution}
266 F.3d 675 p.683
7TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
96. / Cited by:Marrero v. Modern Maint. Bldg. Servs., 318 F. Supp. 2d 721, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12059, 174 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3358 (E.D. Wis. 2004) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN6, HN7, HN8, HN10, HN16{Positive}
318 F. Supp. 2d 721 p.725
9TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
97. / Cited by:McNamara-Blad v. Ass'n of Prof'l Flight Attendants, 275 F.3d 1165, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 450, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 291, 2002 D.A.R. 407, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2147, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11226 (9th Cir. Cal. 2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN8{Positive}
275 F.3d 1165 p.1171
9TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
98. / Cited by:Flathau v. Int'l Ass'n of Machinists, Dist. 141, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8827, 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2526 (W.D. Wash. May 14, 2003) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN7, HN8, HN10, HN16
2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8827
99. / Cited by:Madison v. Motion Picture Set Painters & Sign Writers Local 729, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1244, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20979 (C.D. Cal. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN6, HN7, HN10, HN16, HN17, HN20{Positive}
132 F. Supp. 2d 1244 p.1256
10TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
100. / Followed by:Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. Pierce, 253 F.3d 1234, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14214, 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3313, 50 Fed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 244 (10th Cir. Kan. 2001) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN13, HN17{Warning}
253 F.3d 1234 p.1240
101. / Cited by:Thomas v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers, 225 F.3d 1149, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22208, 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 5116, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P40185, 87 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 325 (10th Cir. Kan. 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN10, HN16{Positive}
225 F.3d 1149 p.1158
10TH CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURTS
102. / Cited by:Thomas v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers, 40 F. Supp. 2d 1244, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1928, 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3020 (D. Kan. 1999) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN10, HN16{Positive}
40 F. Supp. 2d 1244 p.1247
11TH CIRCUIT - COURT OF APPEALS
103. / Cited by:De Perez v. AT&T Co., 139 F.3d 1368, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8241, 11 Fla. L. Weekly C 1267 (11th Cir. Ga. 1998) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN11{Warning}
139 F.3d 1368 p.1373
D.C. CIRCUIT - U.S. DISTRICT COURT
104. / Cited by:UAW-Labor Empl. & Training Corp. v. Chao, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50, 169 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2073, 145 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P11166 (D.D.C. Jan. 2, 2002) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN8, HN10, HN16{Warning}
2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50
OHIO COURT OF APPEALS
105. / Cited by:Bowman v. Bowman, 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 886 (Ohio Ct. App., Montgomery County Mar. 10, 2000) LexisNexis HeadnotesHN21{Analysis}
2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 886 p.12
ANNOTATED STATUTES ( 1 Citing Statute )
106. / 28 USCS @ 1331LAW REVIEWS AND PERIODICALS ( 4 Citing References )
107. / NOTE: "SALVAGE OPERATIONS ARE ORDINARILY PREFERABLE TO THE WRECKING BALL": BARRING CHALLENGES TO SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 2369 (2005)105 Colum. L. Rev. 2369 p.2369
108. / ARTICLE: INCONSISTENT CONSISTENCY: A COMMENT ON ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT OF THE FEDERAL COMMON LAW OF FOREIGN RELATIONS, 16 Fla. J. Int'l L. 789 (2004)109. / ARTICLE: Crosscurrents: Supplemental Jurisdiction, Removal, and the ALI Revision Project *, 74 Ind. L.J. 75 (1998)
74 Ind. L.J. 75 p.75
110. / SYMPOSIUM: CLASS ACTIONS IN THE GULF SOUTH AND BEYOND: A Primer on the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 80 Tul. L. Rev. 1617 (2006)80 Tul. L. Rev. 1617 p.1617
TREATISE CITATIONS ( 3 Citing Sources )
111. / 4-52 Doing Business in the United States @ 52.06112. / 16-107 Moore's Federal Practice - Civil @ 107.14
113. / 1-8 Moore's Manual--Federal Practice and Procedure @ 8.21