Table S2Response of herbicide treatment on different lines tested under greenhouse and field experimentsas treatments vs. control
Cultivar / Treatment / *Crop injury (%) in greenhouse experiment14-DAT / 21-DAT / 28-DAT / 35-DAT
WA8143 / Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
105 gai/ha / 5 / 10 / 10 / 5
140 gai/ha / 10 / 15 / 15 / 10
ORCF102 / Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
105 gai/ha / 10 / 20 / 20 / 10
140 gai/ha / 25 / 50 / 50 / 40
AP503CL / Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
105 gai/ha / 5 / 10 / 10 / 5
140 gai/ha / 10 / 15 / 15 / 10
Eltan / Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
105 gai/ha / 75 / 90 / 90 / 100
140 gai/ha / 80 / 100 / 100 / 100
LSD (0.05) / 3.8 / 2.9 / 2.4 / 2
Cultivar / *Crop injury (%) in field experiment
WA8143 / Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
52.5 gai/ha / 5 / 5 / 5 / 0
105 gai/ha / 10 / 15 / 10 / 10
ORCF102 / Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
52.5 gai/ha / 15 / 20 / 15 / 10
105 gai/ha / 25 / 40 / 40 / 30
AP503CL2 / Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
52.5 gai/ha / 5 / 5 / 5 / 5
105 gai/ha / 10 / 15 / 15 / 10
Eltan / Control / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
52.5 gai/ha / 70 / 80 / 80 / 100
105 gai/ha / 75 / 80 / 90 / 100
LSD (0.05) / 3.4 / 2.9 / 3.2 / 3.1
*Crop injury was recorded in 0-100% scales, 0% no crop injury recorded whereas 100% complete plant death, DAT Days after treatment injury (%) recorded after imazamox spray