Department/Unit Responsible for CSTL
Report Prepared By
Objective 1: To support Member States to strengthen, expand and sustain their education sector responses to the prevention, care and support needs of children and youth, especially vulnerable girls
Outcome: Education sectors in Member States respond to the prevention, care and support needs of children and youth, especially vulnerable girls
Focus Area 1.1 Policy Harmonisation / What was planned?/Target this reporting period / Achieved this reporting period / Variance/Comments- What MoE policies have been reviewed/revised to align them with the Policy Framework for CSTL?
Focus Area 1.2 Implementation / What was planned?/Target this reporting period / Achieved this reporting period / Variance/Comments
- What key activities have taken place in the last 12 months to develop / implement the conceptual framework / strategy / national model on care and support for teaching and learning, using knowledge gained from best practices and lessons learnt in the CSTL community of practice?
- What was done this reporting period to get increased resourcing for care and support for teaching and learning?
- What initiatives were implemented in the last 12 months to integrate care and support for teaching and learning into the curriculum?
- How many teachers were trained in the last 12 months in order to improve care and support for teaching and learning?
- What scale up activities were carried out in the last 12 months?
- Were integrated service delivery events carried out in the outreach area during this reporting period? If so, describe these and provide statistics.
- Was any capacity building provided for PTAs / SGBs and SSSs in the outreach area in order to ensure the protection, care and support of vulnerable children and youth?
- Were any school and / or community food gardens established in the outreach area this reporting period? Please provide statistics and achievements.
Focus Area 1.3 Partnerships / What was planned?/Target this reporting period / Achieved this reporting period / Variance/Comments
- What was done in this reporting period to strengthen the CSTL NCU?
- What other initiatives were carried out to establish/strengthen coordinated delivery of care and support services through multisectoral partnerships and structures? At what level (national, sub-national, local)?
Focus Area 1.4 M and E / What was planned?/Target this reporting period / Achieved this reporting period / Variance/Comments
- What CSTL indicators were successfully integrated into MoE EMIS in this reporting period?
- How was the customized MER framework used to collect and analyse data at all levels for care and support for teaching and learning in this last reporting period?
Focus Area 1.5 Knowledge Management / What was planned?/Target this reporting period / Achieved this reporting period / Variance/Comments
- Has the member state participated in annual Sharing Meetings for all MS in the last six months? What type of participation was it and what have been the benefits to the MoE if any?
- How many NCU members have been trained in the use of the CSTL website platform? Following the training, how has the NCU and the CSTL programme benefited from using thewebsite?
- Has the member state participated in CSTL annual exchange visits between MSs? If Yes, how many people, at what level of office? What have been the benefits to CSTL in the MS?
3.2Objective 2: To support Member States to partner with local services and safety nets that address HIV&AIDS, SRHR and other health needs of children and youth, especially vulnerable girls
Outcome: Local services and safety nets in Member States address HIV&AIDS, SRHR and other health needs of children and youth, especially vulnerable girls
Address HIV&AIDS, SRHR and other health needs of children/youth/girls / What was planned?/Target this reporting period / Achieved this reporting period / Variance/Comments- What was done in this reporting period to establish / strengthen multisectoralcoordinating structures for SRHR and HIV/AIDS at local level?
- What was done to ensure the delivery of targeted HIV&AIDs and SRHR programmes for vulnerable girls through multisectoral partnerships and structures at local level?
- What specific targeted programmes addressing HIV&AIDS, SRHR and other health issues in schools were implemented this reporting period? Was My life! My future! programme used to implement these; if not, what resources were used?
- What was done to implement a safe schools programme in schools in outreach areas this reporting period? Was Speak Out used, and if not, what resources were used for programming?
- Were any specific activities carried out to strengthen the HIV&AIDS and SRHR component of the Life Skills curriculum this reporting period?
- Where any teachers trained in the strengthened Life Skills curriculum on SRHR and HIV/AIDS? If so, how many in primary and how many in secondary schools?
- Were any activities implemented to develop / strengthen referral systems for youth friendly SRHR services?
- Was anything done to deliver accessible youth-friendly SRHR services for boys and girls through local partnerships in the outreach area? Describe the activities.
3.3Objective 3: To support Member States to advocate for and implement policies and programmes promoting and protecting the rights of vulnerable, marginalized children and youth, as expressed in the Regional CSTL Policy Framework
Outcome 3: Member States promote and protect the rights of marginalized, vulnerable children and youth
Promoting and protecting the rights of vulnerable, marginalized children and youth / What was planned?/Target this reporting period / Achieved this reporting period / Variance/Comments- Does the MS have a formal advocacy strategy focusing on the rights of vulnerable children and youth? If so, please attach.
- Were any advocacy materials developed/produced in this reporting period? What were they for? And what key messages and target groups were they for?
- Were there activities implemented in the advocacy strategy, focusing on the rights of vulnerable children and youth? Describe them and the impact they had.
- Has the CSTL 2011 audit been used to strengthen MoE policies and programmes? If so, how have the rights of vulnerable children and youth been prioritized in MoE policies and programmes?
Part 2: School Level – General/Overall CSTL Programming in the Country (beyond the baseline schools)
This section needs to be updated annually with reference to the EMIS and other available sources
1.General Statistics 2013/4
Statistics / Primary / Secondary / Total / Data Source and Year- Total Number of Schools in Country
- Number of Schools Under CSTL Programming
Male / Female / Male / Female
- Enrolment Rate
- Retention Rate
- Pass Rate
- Drop Out
- Completion
2.Education outcomes – have the target education outcomes at national level improved/deteriorated in the previous year? Explain the possible reasons in the variance/comments column below
.
Outcomes / 2012/13 / Achieved 2014 / Variance/Comments- Enrolment Rate
- Retention Rate
- Pass Rate
- Drop Out Rate
- Completion Rate
3.For the following CSTL service areas, answer the following:
CSTL Area / New interventions in this reporting period / Any new partners / Number of schools reachedPrimary / Secondary
- Health
- Nutrition
- Psychosocial support
- Material, social and welfare
- Safety and protection
- Water and sanitation
Part 3 Challenges and Opportunities
1.Challenges
What main challenges did you face and what mitigation strategies have you come up with (complete the table below).
Challenge / Mitigation2.Opportunities
Please reflect on upcoming opportunities which might facilitate the implementation of the CSTL programme in your country.( Use bullet points)
3.Lessons learnt
Please list any lessons learnt, both positive and negative lesson.
Page 1 of 10
With support from the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)