Commissioning for personalisation
Duncan MacKay, Head of Social Work Development, North Lanarkshire Council
June 2008
Duncan MacKay gave a presentation outlining his views on the link between personalisation and commissioning. Issues covered included:
- What do people mean by the term personalisation? (DMc thinks personalised services are planned, designed and funded on an individual level)
- In considering someone’s needs, don’t automatically equate this with services
- The important issue is changing the balance of choice and control, not the method by which payment is made i.e. you shouldn’t have to move to direct payments to get a personalised service
- Issues for councils around managing the market and ensuring that providers are there to provide services if all financial control handed over to individuals
- Simon Duffy: providers who don’t provide a personalised service won’t survive – is it as black and white as that?
- Providers can become too big to provide an individualised service
- There will inevitably be changes in the way services are provided e.g. use of technology rather than sleepovers
- The relationships between councils, providers and individuals will all change
- Local authority’s role should be assessment (with more work done on self-assessment), public protection and measuring/reviewing outcomes i.e. NOT micro management
- At the moment, reporting systems measure ‘old ways’ of doing things
- Challenges to the personalisation agenda include efficient government, shared services, procurement, accountability of public funds and disparities in eligibility criteria.
There followed a Q&A/discussion session, during which the following issues were raised:
- How does the idea of individualised services fit with rigorous contracting requirements?
- People in social work aren’t confident about contracting and legal/financial contracts officers don’t understand social work
- Providers should consider carefully whether or not they want to pursue business that is not personalised
- How many local authority commissioners would share Duncan’s view?
- Limits on flexibility of e.g. Working Time Directive
- How to manage the risks of building up and using natural supports in individuals’ lives
- Local authorities, individuals, their families and providers should all discuss and agree on risks
- Why are people not demanding direct payments?
- We need to demonstrate what is possible, which will build momentum
- We need to raise people’s expectations, not be paternal
- Some carers/people who use services don’t want to be in control
- Do people start to view their financial allocation as an entitlement ?
- Is there a risk that individuals get caught in the crossfire when e.g. la’s won’t give inflationary uplift (evidence from England of people rationing their own services)?
- There is a great need for service re-design