ROC ASSESSMENT REMOTE PILOT STATION INSPECTION
ROC ASSESSMENT
INSPECTION OF REMOTE PILOT STATION
ROC ASSESSMENT REMOTE PILOT STATION INSPECTION
ROC Assessment – Remote Pilot Station
OC Applicant / ARNJob Number
RemotePilot Station Specification and Inspection
RPS Identification:
Type: …………………………… Model: …………..………………….. Serial Number: ……………………………..……….
Identification Plate: Yes/No Details (if applicable) ………………………......
Manufacturer: ……………………………………………………….……......
Type Design Data: ………………………………………..………………......
1.Communication / Data Link
S – Serviceable/Suitable U – Unserviceable/Unsuitable N/A – Not Applicable
S/U / Comment if ApplicableRadio Control Gear (if applicable)
- Robustness to interference (FH/DSS)
- Range and performance suitable for
- Placement to RP
Command and Control Telemetry Link
- Range and performance suitable for intended operations
- Modem and antenna placement
- Power
- Redundancy Separate link to payload data link
First Person View
- Range and performance suitable for intended operations
- Modem and antenna placement
- Power
- Redundancy
Communications with Air Traffic Control
- Phone (including contact numbers)
- Airband VHF Radio (frequencies)
- Power / charging, placement
- Backup
Transponders (SSR / ADS-B)
- Controls for setting ID/QNH
Local Aviation Traffic Awareness
- Airband VHF Radio
- Other traffic awareness display
- Placement and visibility
- Alerts and warnings
Communications Performance Monitoring
- Range and signal strength
- Low signal warnings
- Outages
Cables
- Placement and routing (foot traffic, length)
- Quality of cabling
- Quality of connectors used
- Water, dust, and other hazards
Electro-magnetic compatibility
- Compliant transmitters (ACMA)
- EMI
- Compatibility with other transmitters
Communication with Remote Crew
- Quality of UHF radios etc
- Charging / power
- Placement
Other
2.RPSEquipment
S – Serviceable/Suitable U – Unserviceable/Unsuitable N/A – Not Applicable
S/U / Comment if ApplicableBattery and Power Supplies
- Placement
- Cables
- Sheltering from weather
- Warnings for low power
- Redundancy / backup / secondary
- Switching between sources
- Fuel storage (if appropriate)
- Safety / Circuit breakers etc.
- Load shedding / management
Antenna
- Placement (high and clear)
- Suitable ground plane
- Antenna pointing systems
- Length of RF cables
- Stability of any tripods or towers
Computing Hardware
- Suitable for outdoor use (if applicable)
- Readability and placement of displays
- Water and dust protection
- Placement of controls
Desks / Chairs / Shelter / Environment
- Protection from elements
- Good visibility
- Ergonomics
- Secure / wind
- Temperature control
- Lighting
- Suitable crew location
Safety Equipment (if applicable)
- PPE
- Fire extinguishers / sand
- First aid kit
Other
3.RPS Mission Management Software
S – Serviceable/Suitable U – Unserviceable/Unsuitable N/A – Not Applicable
S/U / Comment if ApplicableSituational Awareness Display
- Size
- Readability
- Critical flight information (attitude, speed, location, height/altitude, mode, health status, etc.)
- Guidance information (waypoints, mission boundaries, exclusion zones, map of obstacles/terrain, etc.)
- Baro / Weather
- Traffic awareness (if available)
Control Input
- Software and peripherals used
- Placement
- Easy of use for control mode
- Ease of transition between control modes
Health and Status Monitoring
- Built in test
- Presentation of battery / fuel
- Communication signal strength
- Geo-fences and other boundaries
- Clear aural / visual warnings
Fail Safe and Contingency
- Placement of activation buttons or mechanisms
- Protection against inadvertent triggering
- Display of contingency mode (e.g., return home activated)
- Display of contingency flight path (e.g., fly home path)
Software Redundancy
- Stability
- Control of RPA when RPS Software freezes or crashes
- Management of software versions and updates
Databases
- Terrain and obstacle databases (currency, datum, control of download, updates, etc.)
Mission Recording and Data Management
- Recording / playback of missions
- Data storage
Other
FDS-CHK-06-1.0Version 1.01of 10
ROC ASSESSMENT REMOTE PILOT STATION INSPECTION
4.RPSPayload Systems
S – Serviceable/Suitable U – Unserviceable/Unsuitable N/A – Not Applicable
S/U / Comment if ApplicablePayload work station
- Assess in terms of potential impact on mission critical systems only
- Common software, hardware, power, communications, etc.
Other
5.RPS Documentation
S – Serviceable/Suitable U – Unserviceable/Unsuitable N/A – Not Applicable
S/U / Comment if ApplicableUser Manual(s)
- Correctly reflects RPS / up to date
- Readability
- Quality
- Availability to crew
- Version and documentation control
Flight Manual / Operations Manual
- Correctly reflects RPS
- Readability
- Availability to crew
- Version and documentation control
Maps / AIP
- Applicable maps
- Copy of NOTAM
Maintenance Manual and Release
- Correctly reflects RPS / up to date
- Availability to crew
- Version and documentation control
Emergency Materials
- Procedures
- Emergency contact list
RPS Records and Logs
- Battery records etc.
- Other logs and records for RPS
Other
FDS-CHK-06-1.0Version 1.01of 10
ROC ASSESSMENT REMOTE PILOT STATION INSPECTION
6.Flight Manual Details (RPS)
RPA Type:……………………………………….
Flight Manual No: ……………...……………………………………......
Revision Number/Date: ………..……………………………………………………………..
Verify activity is authorised: ………..…………..……...... …………....………......
Verify personnel are authorised: ………….….………………………………......
RPA Flight Plan assessed: ……………………....……………………….…………………
Flyingtimesenteredintodailyrecords:..………..………………….………
Progressive total of times are recorded:.…………………….…………….
Number of landings recorded: …………………………………..………...…………...
For Electrical powered, battery details and usage recorded:
...... ……………………………………………………………..………………………………..
FDS-CHK-06-1.0Version 1.01of 10
ROC ASSESSMENT REMOTE PILOT STATION INSPECTION
arch 18,201
7.Remote Pilot Station (RPS) Inspection Summary Comment:
FDS-CHK-06-1.0Version 1.01of 10