EAP Wiki Pages Assessment Rubric

Cristina Felea, Ph.D., Wiki Assessment Rubric, June 2012

Specialist Wiki Assessment Rubric

UNIT TITLE: Employee Relations

NAMES OF GROUP MEMBERS / English level / No. of comments on wiki page(s) / Contribution to the wiki
(your responsibilities) / Total number of
edits/semester
Central unit / Sub-page(s) / Central unit / Sub-page(s)
1.Baba Raluca Diana / B2 / - / * / 10 / 3
2. Bogdan Roxana / B2 / - / - / -
3. Hosu Veronica / A2-B1 / - / * / 8 / -
4. Radu Patricia / B2 / - / * / 8 / 3
5. Ratiu Bianca / A2-B1 / - / * / 8 / -
6. Retegan Alexandra-Paula / B2 / 1 / * / * / 46 / 28
7.Varodi Alexandru / B2 / - / * / 6 / -
Element / Exemplary
3 / Proficient
2 / Partially Proficient
1 / Unsatisfactory
0 / Points
Content / 1 Individual contribution / See this ON PAGE 5..
2 The overall unit / Covers most assignments (over 80%) with reference to unit topics and sub-topics. Follows instructions provided by teacher. / Covers almost all assignments (over 50%) with reference to unit topics and sub-topics.
Follows instructions most of the time. / Covers only about 50% of assignments with reference to unit topics. Shows long stretches of copied/pasted texts (from books or elsewhere) with little or no relation with the unit topics.
Follows instructions occasionally. / Covers less than 50% of assignments. Copies and pastes short texts (from books or elsewhere) with no relation with the unit topics.
Does not follow instructions. / 2/3
Originality / - All material on the wiki is summarized, not copied.
- All sources are cited and quoted text is accounted for (including multimedia links or embedded material)
- The text makes sense and is meaningful to the topic.
- Uses credible[1] sources as recommended / - Almost all material on the wiki is summarized, not copied
- Most sources are cited and almost all quoted text is accounted for (including multimedia links or embedded material)
- The text makes sense and is mostly meaningful to the topic
- Uses mostly credible sources as recommended / - Some material on the wiki is summarized, most is copied
- Few sources are cited and almost all quoted text is NOT accounted for (including multimedia links or embedded material)
- The text does not make much sense and is only somehow meaningful to the topic
- Uses mostly commercial, non-reliable/relevant sources and only some credible sources as recommended / - All material on the wiki is copied.
- No sources are cited and quoted text is NOT accounted for (including multimedia links or embedded material)
- The text does not make much sense and is not meaningful to the topic
- The sources used are not reliable and no recommended sources are used / 2/3
Element / Exemplary
3 / Proficient
2 / Partially Proficient
1 / Unsatisfactory
0 / Points
Page Layout / Follows the page template and makes frequent and effective use of headings[2], fonts, bullet points, line separators and white space to enhance the content’s visual appeal and increase readability[3].
. / Follows the page template and makes occasional use of headings, fonts, bullet points and white space to enhance the content’s visual appeal and increase readability. / Makes minimal use of page template and of headings, fonts, bullet points and white space to enhance visual appeal and readability. / Makes no use of page template, headings, fonts, bullet points or white space. There is no visual appeal and readability / 2/3
Organisation / Uses the recommended organizational structure to group related information and new elements are embedded and presented logically.
Provides a flat table of contents. / Uses some of the recommended organizational structure which groups some but not all, related information, and/or provides a table of contents. New elements are not all logically embedded/ presented. / Uses a loosely defined organizational structure which attempts to group similar items. Many elements are not in a logical order. / Fails to provide a regular organizational structure, and information is difficult to locate. / 2/3
Hyperlinks / Includes links to relevant, up-to-date websites or documents that add to the information presented. / Includes links to relevant, up-to-date websites or documents, but not all links add to the information presented. / Includes links to websites or documents which add little value to the information presented. / Does not include any links, or the links selected are of poor quality and do not add any value to the information presented. / 3/3
All hyperlinks are correctly formatted.[4] Provides brief descriptions (annotations). / Most hyperlinks are correctly formatted. Provides brief descriptions (annotations). / Some hyperlinks are correctly formatted. Does not provide brief descriptions (annotations). / All hyperlinks are incorrectly formatted. / 3/3
Element / Exemplary
3 / Proficient
2 / Partially Proficient
1 / Unsatisfactory
0 / Points
Graphics and Multimedia / Illustrates information according to instructions. Selects high quality graphics and multimedia when appropriate to enhance and clarify the content. / Illustrates information mostly according to instructions. Selects graphics and multimedia which are mostly high quality and enhance and clarify the content. / Does not follow instructions for illustrating topic.
Selects many low-quality graphics and multimedia which do not enhance the content / Does not follow instructions for illustrating topic.
Selects no graphics, or uses only low-quality graphics and multimedia which do not enhance the content. / 3/3
Acknowledges all image and multimedia sources with captions or annotations.
Creates separately APA style citations in the Reference section for all sources used. / Acknowledges most image and multimedia sources with captions or annotations.
Creates separately APA style citations in the Reference section for most sources used. / Acknowledges only a few multimedia and image sources and uses incomplete captions or annotations.
Creates separately APA style citations in the Reference section for pne or two sources used. / Fails to acknowledge any image or multimedia sources, either with a caption or an annotation. / 3/3
Citation / Accurately cites all sources in the Referemce Section to support the credibility and authority of the information presented. Uses consistently APA format. / Most sources are cited accurately, and support the credibility of the information presented. APA format is used in most cases. / Few sources are cited accurately, and they fail to adequately support the credibility of the information presented. There is no effort to meet APA criteria. / Does not provide any accurate information about sources used. / 3/3
Writing Mechanics / Edits the text with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. / Edits the text with minor additional editing required for grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. / Edits the text, but errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling distract or impair readability.
(3 or more errors) / Edits the text but numerous errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling repeatedly distract the reader and major revision is required. (more than 5 errors) / 3/3
Wiki Participation
(group behaviour) / All members started editing pages between March 7 and March 31.
All members exhibit appropriate wiki behaviour, respect the work of others, make pertinent comments and answers to others’ comments. / Most members started editing pages between April 1 and April 15.
Group members show appropriate wiki behaviour most of the time, respect the work of others and sometimes make/ answer to comments.
. / Most members started editing pages between April 16 and May 15.
Group members show a minimum knowledge of wiki behaviour. They make very few comments and never answer to others’ comments. / Minimum edits since May 16 or no effort to edit page at all. / 2/3
TOTAL / _28___/33
PERCENTAGE / 84,84%/100

(Adapted from Karen Franker, University of Wisconsin Wiki Rubric. Retrieved 01/12/2010.)

SEE PAGES BELOW FOR INDIVIDUAL ASSESMENT

1.Baba Raluca Diana / Individual contribution[5] / - His/her contribution is 20-30% above group average edits[6].
- Provides all elements in a logically structured way. - Provides personalized approach by adding supplementary information and comments.
- Always meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates in final revision of wiki unit.
/ - His/her contribution is around group average edits
- Provides almost all elements in a relatively structured way.
- Provides some original contributions and comments.
- Usually meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates a little in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 50% of group average edits
- Provides minimum elements with no structure.
- Provides one or two personal ideas and no comments.
- Sometimes meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 80% of group average edits
- Provides minimum or no elements.
- Does not provide any original ideas or comments.
- Never meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / 1/3
2.Bogdan Roxana / Individual contribution[7] / - His/her contribution is 20-30% above group average edits[8].
- Provides all elements in a logically structured way. - Provides personalized approach by adding supplementary information and comments.
- Always meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates in final revision of wiki unit.
/ - His/her contribution is around group average edits
- Provides almost all elements in a relatively structured way.
- Provides some original contributions and comments.
- Usually meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates a little in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 50% of group average edits
- Provides minimum elements with no structure.
- Provides one or two personal ideas and no comments.
- Sometimes meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 80% of group average edits
- Provides minimum or no elements.
- Does not provide any original ideas or comments.
- Never meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / -/3
3.Hosu Veronica / Individual contribution[9] / - His/her contribution is 20-30% above group average edits[10].
- Provides all elements in a logically structured way. - Provides personalized approach by adding supplementary information and comments.
- Always meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates in final revision of wiki unit.
/ - His/her contribution is around group average edits
- Provides almost all elements in a relatively structured way.
- Provides some original contributions and comments.
- Usually meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates a little in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 50% of group average edits
- Provides minimum elements with no structure.
- Provides one or two personal ideas and no comments.
- Sometimes meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 80% of group average edits
- Provides minimum or no elements.
- Does not provide any original ideas or comments.
- Never meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / 2/3
4.Radu Patricia / Individual contribution[11] / - His/her contribution is 20-30% above group average edits[12].
- Provides all elements in a logically structured way. - Provides personalized approach by adding supplementary information and comments.
- Always meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates in final revision of wiki unit.
/ - His/her contribution is around group average edits
- Provides almost all elements in a relatively structured way.
- Provides some original contributions and comments.
- Usually meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates a little in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 50% of group average edits
- Provides minimum elements with no structure.
- Provides one or two personal ideas and no comments.
- Sometimes meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 80% of group average edits
- Provides minimum or no elements.
- Does not provide any original ideas or comments.
- Never meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / 2/3
5.Ratiu Bianca / Individual contribution[13] / - His/her contribution is 20-30% above group average edits[14].
- Provides all elements in a logically structured way. - Provides personalized approach by adding supplementary information and comments.
- Always meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates in final revision of wiki unit.
/ - His/her contribution is around group average edits
- Provides almost all elements in a relatively structured way.
- Provides some original contributions and comments.
- Usually meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates a little in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 50% of group average edits
- Provides minimum elements with no structure.
- Provides one or two personal ideas and no comments.
- Sometimes meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 80% of group average edits
- Provides minimum or no elements.
- Does not provide any original ideas or comments.
- Never meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / 2/3
6.Retegan Alexandra / Individual contribution[15]
Wiki nickname:
reteganalexandrapaula
English level:B2 / - His/her contribution is 20-30% above group average edits[16].
- Provides all elements in a logically structured way. - Provides personalized approach by adding supplementary information and comments.
- Always meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates in final revision of wiki unit.
/ - His/her contribution is around group average edits
- Provides almost all elements in a relatively structured way.
- Provides some original contributions and comments.
- Usually meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates a little in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 50% of group average edits
- Provides minimum elements with no structure.
- Provides one or two personal ideas and no comments.
- Sometimes meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 80% of group average edits
- Provides minimum or no elements.
- Does not provide any original ideas or comments.
- Never meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / 3/3
7.Varodi Alexandru / Individual contribution[17] / - His/her contribution is 20-30% above group average edits[18].
- Provides all elements in a logically structured way. - Provides personalized approach by adding supplementary information and comments.
- Always meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates in final revision of wiki unit.
/ - His/her contribution is around group average edits
- Provides almost all elements in a relatively structured way.
- Provides some original contributions and comments.
- Usually meets deadlines and goals.
- Participates a little in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 50% of group average edits
- Provides minimum elements with no structure.
- Provides one or two personal ideas and no comments.
- Sometimes meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / - His/her contribution is less than 80% of group average edits
- Provides minimum or no elements.
- Does not provide any original ideas or comments.
- Never meets deadlines and goals.
- Does not participate in final revision. / 2/3

If necessary, add here individual rubrics for additional participants.